Obamas arrested

Obamas arrested
Pray for the day!

Senate Refused to Vet Obama

We're Never Gonna Stand For This

Freedom of Speech Will No Longer Be Possible

The original Kenyan birth certificate of Obama

Dog Day Afternoon

Is it here, yet?

This is an American Tradition That Has Always Been Valuable to Us

To Arrest Obama or Force America to Live Enslaved?

Obama is a Muslim

Restore America

There's a Communist Living in the white House

Dr. Taitz on Obama

The Enemy is Obama

How to Become an Underground Publisher and help take back America


There you will find directions and suggested material and web sites to check to find other material. You are welcome to take material from this site, the info service site, or just find your own. Whatever please commit to spread the word.

Join us at http://blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots every Monday 3:30 p.m. pactific standard time


Lakin Defense Options !!!


The Stand Up America BlogSTAND UP AMERICA EXCLUSIVE – Lakin Defense OptionsPublished on 09/03/10

Editor’s Note: The following report is solely the product of the authors and is posted here for the public to view, and discern for themselves. It is a scholarly work and may clear up many questions readers may have.

Courts Martial Defense For LTC Terrence LakinBy J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington

World Net Daily, which has been following the Lakin trial step-by-step from the beginning, is reporting:

FT. MEADE, Md. – A career officer in the U.S. Army [Col. Denise R. Lind] acting as a judge in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin today ruled that the military is no place for Barak Obama’s presidential eligibility to be evaluated.
According to the WND report, presiding authority Col. Denise R. Lind used the following arguments to deny LTC Lakin proper access to a defense, summarized in the following three paragraphs taken from the 40 minute long reading of her decision Army Col. Denise R. Lind today ruled in a hearing regarding the evidence to be allowed in the scheduled October court-martial of Lakin that he will be denied access to any of Obama’s records as well as any testimony from those who may have access to the records.

With her decision, Lind mirrored a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs’ access to any requested documentation regarding the president’s eligibility.
Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.

We find foundational flaws in Col. Lind’s decision, which Lakin’s defense team must seize upon in order to alter the current course of this trial.

1 – Lind’s authority is derived from the same place as LTC Lakin’s and all other members of the United States Military – from the supreme command of the office of Commander-in-Chief, the President of the United States.

2 – Lind is attempting to use her authority under her Commander-in-Chief to break the military chain of command, isolating the Commander-in-Chief of the US Military specifically, exempting the President from his position of authority in the chain of command, without which, Lind herself has no authority to convene the Courts Martial.

3 – Lind then reaches outside of the US Military Justice system to the Civil Court, relying upon civil court precedent to deny Lakin any access to discovery and thereby, a proper defense guaranteed him by the US Constitution and UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice. Civil Court precedent has no legal standing in a UCMJ criminal proceeding. In fact, the UCMJ is based upon the Articles of War (aka War Articles) and is a “penal system” unlike the US Justice System – as explained by Col. William Winthrop in Military Law and Precedents. As a result, precedents set in courts outside of the UCMJ are without legal standing in any UCMJ proceeding.

4 – Not even in the UCMJ can the United States government deny the accused his/her right to a trial, complete with discovery of related evidence. Yet Lind attempts to do so, under the authority derived from her Commander-in-Chief. If the chain of command is broken, then Lind herself has no authority.

5 – Lind’s statement that the legality of the Commander-in-Chief is “not relevant” in matters of military command is false on its face. As stated in a sworn affidavit filed by LTG Thomas G. McInerney executed on August 20, 2010 – “In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. – By thus stepping up to the bar, LTC Lakin is demonstrating the courage of his convictions and his bravery. – That said, it is equally essential that he be allowed access to the evidence that will prove whether he made the correct decision.”

6 – Lind attempts to break the chain of command at The Pentagon level, which she claims has no issue with the current Commander-in-Chief and that this should be good enough for Lakin. Yet she cannot break this chain of command without eliminating her own authority, and Lakin’s oath requires that he decide for himself whether or not his orders are legal, as affirmed in LTG McInerney’s sworn affidavit.

7 – At issue is not whether or not LTC Lakin refused orders, but rather whether or not he “unlawfully” refused orders. If his orders were not “lawful,” including but not limited to, emanating from a “lawful” chain of command which begins with a lawful Commander-in-Chief, then Lakin must be found NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.
At the heart of the matter is whether or not his orders to deploy were “lawful.” LTC Lakin has questioned whether or not his deployment orders were “lawful” on the basis that he believes that the Commander-in-Chief from which those orders are issued, may not be “lawful,” therefore making any orders from the top of military command “unlawful.”
To determine whether or not Lakin is correct in his decision to refuse orders, it is paramount to discover with certainty whether or not his orders were issued by a “lawful” command.
As we know, Article II – Section I requires that only a “natural born citizen” of the United States can hold the office of President, Commander-in-Chief. In this regard, a fatal misstep in the Lakin defense has opened the door for the illegitimate statements now being made by Col. Denise R. Lind.

LTC Lakin failed to directly assert that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT legal in his command on the basis that we know with certainty that he is not a “natural born citizen,” – and that LTC Lakin is “lawfully” refusing to follow orders on this basis. Instead, LTC Lakin only asked the “birth place” question and tied that question to whether or not Mr. Obama could and would present an official “birth certificate” proving once and for all that he was indeed born in Hawaii, making the wrong assumption that if he could and would provide proof of said birth via an official birth certificate, which has never been released to date.

The fatal error revolves around the reality that Obama’s birth place is of no consequence in the matter of his status as a “natural born citizen” eligible for high Command of the US Military under Article II – Section I of the Constitution. Although there is no shortage of opinions on the subject of what the term “natural born citizen” means, there is no honest debate on the matter either.

Every Supreme Court Justice knows exactly what the term “natural born citizen” means, where it came from, why it exists in Article II requirements for the office of President and that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a “natural born citizen,” indeed ineligible for the office he currently holds.

They know that LTC Lakin is right to “lawfully” refuse orders from an illegal Command.

We know this on the basis of the following critical facts:

1 – The term “natural born citizen” is derived from the Law of Nations. An international treaty establishing a set of rules used to establish a “nation,” the issue of nation and citizen sovereignty, and internationally recognized definitions of universal terms, including the term “natural born citizen.”

2 – The Law of Nations is specifically mentioned in the US Constitution as an enumerated power of Congress under Article I – Section VIII – Item X – “To define and punish offenses against the Law of Nations;” (Note that in the original Constitution, Law of Nations is capitalized, referring specifically to THE Law of Nations.)

3 – From Emerich de Vattel’s 1758 book on The Law of Nations, Chapter 19 § 212. – Of the citizens and natives – Vattel establishes – “in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

4 – In a letter from Founder John Jay to then President of the Constitutional Convention George Washington, Jay stated – “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

5 – It was later learned that President George Washington had actually taken out Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations from the local library in order to study proper implementation of law in our newly formed nation, and never returned that book. On the basis of known history and facts behind the Constitutional term “natural born citizen” which is based upon “natural law” explained in the Law of Nations as stated referred to in the US Constitution, the proper assertion is not at all related to the actual “birth place” of Barack Hussein Obama, II. The ongoing search for a Hawaiian birth certificate has no bearing on the subject of “natural born citizen” status for Barack Hussein Obama, II.

The only relative question is:

Was Barack Hussein Obama’s birth father a legal citizen of the United States of America at the time of his birth, no matter where in the world he may have been born? Without a birth father who was a legal citizen of the United States at the time of his birth, Barack Hussein Obama, II cannot be a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, he is not without divided national loyalties, and cannot serve as President of the United States or Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military as a result, creating a national security and a full blown Constitutional crisis.

According to the two autobiographical books by Barack Hussein Obama, II – his birth father is Barack Hussein Obama, a British subject at the time and a legal citizen of Kenya. According to public family history, Barack Hussein Obama was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States.

On this basis alone, LTC Lakin is right (and lawful) in refusing to accept orders from an illegal command. The US Constitution and the Law of Nations, upon which our sovereign nation was formed, are very clear on the matter.

As a result, the need for LTC Lakin to gain access to the Hawaiian birth records for Barack Hussein Obama, II is eliminated.

LTC Lakin need only assert the following:

On the basis of Article II – Section I of the US Constitution, supported by Article I – Section VIII – Item X concerning the Law of Nations and the term “natural born citizen,” – I hereby refuse any and all illegal orders issued by the illegal Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military, President Barack Hussein Obama, on the basis that he does not meet Constitutional requirements for the office he currently holds and must further hereby demand that he be removed from office and immediately relieved of Command of the United States Military. I further assert that due to the illegal status of existing Military high Command that this Court Martial has no authority under which to proceed.

Under this assertion, there is no need for access to the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama, II, unless Mr. Obama chooses to respond by stating that Barack Hussein Obama is not his real birth father, in which case Mr. Obama is admitting to fraud during his pursuit of the Oval Office.
In the event that the UCMJ chooses to challenge the historically accurate definition of the term “natural born citizen” described herein, the US Supreme Court is the only court in the land with proper authority to rule on the true meaning of the term “natural born citizen” – as stated by the Constitutional protections that LTC Lakin has sworn a lifetime to protect and defend.

With this assertion is place, LTC Lakin does not have to prove that his assertions are true and accurate. As Commander-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama must prove that Lakin’s assertion is false in order to proceed with the government prosecution of LTC Lakin on the grounds that he has “unlawfully” refused orders.

In short, Mr. Obama must prove that his orders are in fact “lawful.” If Obama is either unable or unwilling to do so, then LTC Lakin is in fact NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.

This particular case is not about one soldier refusing deployment orders. It is about a nation allowing a precedent to stand which makes it possible for any individual with any foreign allegiance to hold the highest office in this land, with no obligation whatsoever to demonstrate or prove national loyalties before holding the office of President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.

This case is about whether or not the US Constitution stands as the official Law of this land.

NOTE: Past challenges on the term “natural born citizen” have been improperly argued upon cases revolving around the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment relates to “immigration” and “naturalization” laws, not “natural law” used to establish “natural born citizenship” status of an individual. Therefore, any and all cases pertaining to Fourteenth Amendment arguments are moot on the matter of “natural born citizen” claims.

Researched and Prepared By:
J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington
The United States Patriots Union, LLC - Sheridan, Wyoming
Available pdf - Courts Martial Defense of LTC Terrance Lakin.pdf (399kb - 5 pgs)

Researched and Reviewed By:
The United States Bar Association


Rise Up ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwvuimX2bjIStand Up ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Het3H9iQIAir America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dnq8o_7hPccI Am America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2CzerawWho We Are - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHtVxDz43KY Come to Jesus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs10Rr14WxYWe The People - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJEAmerica Rising - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=662R2awSwPQI Fought For You - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTb6qdPu8JEChicago Tea Party - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8kChildren of Liberty - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWnrt0ZLKQIU.S. Cease to Exist - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6p3l8BXmhsGod Save Arizona ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrA07jcIHZIGod Bless Arizona ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKFuYykPSxIAwaken O, America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fzKY0hS_PwRun Into The Conflict - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6lWl_XzKAMuslim Demographics - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYUThree Things About Islam - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6wU.S. has 2 Constitutions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0These are the Oath Keepers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf2K4-BQYAIStop The Socialist Revolution ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtjQzpfq9-UThe Hidden Covenant Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnO-x9hkpX4The Hidden Covenant Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI92qto8gYsOB Mocks, Attacks Jesus, Bible - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi-V_ilJu0wObama Admits He Is A Muslim - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzYSecond American Revolution - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDkWeThePeople Stimulus Package - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyAThe Year of Living Dangerously - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsBOxDM_VekGOD'S JUDGMENT ON AMERICA - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW6roFN7NAENWO Plans 3 World Wars from 1871 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0DIQgnNRY49/11 NWO - Eu USA vs Russia China - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhvfCFCfdNkToo Late to Apologize: A Declaration - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZfRaWAtBVgOur Lives, Fortunes, Sacred Honor 2010 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL5bPJFHRnA

Esoteric Agenda - http://blip.tv/search?q=esoteric+agendaCamp FEMA: American Lockdown (1:26:41) - http://blip.tv/file/3661748Don't Tread On Me: Rise of the Republic (1:35:45) - http://blip.tv/file/3644422/Meltup - InflationUS (54:37) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1n1X0OqdwFall of the Republic HQ (2:24:18) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shUThe Obama Deception HQ (1:53:40) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLwLOOSE CHANGE ! Full Version HD - 9/11 Absolute Truth - http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cnhf29Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA HQ (2:20:38) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klqv9t1zVwwInvisible Empire - NWO Defined HQ (2:14:01) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5ENorman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations (52:24) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHMAmerica: Freedom to Fascism (1:51:16) - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173The Fourth Kind Encounters (1:38) - http://sureynot.com/v/1278/the-fourth-kind,-true-story-with-raw-footage.html

Shadow Government - Grant Jeffrey (4 parts)Pt 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td01pNoC8icPt 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8UlFZZwG3EPt 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsHXb74M3JkPt 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Du7SiYLa90

The United American Freedom Foundation - http://uaff.info/2010 Sex, Drugs & Religion (1:11:14) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1021806902010 Global Eugenics - Using Medicine To Kill (2:04:57) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1007205722010 The American Matrix - Age Of Deception (2:00:03) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1007198422008 The Decline And Fall Of America - The Movie (2:00:46) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=63997187

Twenty Ten - 2010 by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZkvkLmkYVgNBRA Feet to the Fire by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s8BGPy7_MULloyd Marcus - American Tea Party Anthem - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1byTDgu7iAWE THE PEOPLE, New Tea Party Unity Song by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlkgFpU_FB4Confessions of a Black Conservative - http://www.lloydmarcus.com/?page_id=1029Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/user/LloydMarcusUSAhttp://www.lloydmarcus.com

Victory over All Creationhttp://downloads.cbn.com/cbnplayer/cbnPlayer.swf?s=/vod/MW131v2_WS

Run Into The Conflict - "Run For Your Life" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6lWl_XzKA On the first Sunday following the tragedy of September 11th, 2001, Carter Conlon delivered this soul-stirring message at Times Square Church in Manhattan. The sermon was titled, "Run For Your Life" and it is certainly worth the effort to listen to it in its entirety. http://www.braveheartedgospel.com/Sermons.html

U.S. HISTORY REPETITIVE TO END TIMEI - Bondage to Spiritual Faith - Year of The MayflowerII - From Spiritual Faith to great Courage - 1776III - From Courage to Liberty - Constitution 1791IV - From Liberty to Abundance - 1900 to 1960V - From Abundance to Complacency - 1960 to 1980VI - From Complacency to Apathy - 1980 to 2000VII - From Apathy to Dependence - 2000 to 2009 VIII - From Dependence back into Bondage by CONTRIVANCEIX - From Bondage to Spiritual Faith - 2010 to ? by REVIVAL or DEMISE - WWIIIX - RAPTURE - Blessed Assurance has Come - NEW JERUSALEM

Antichrist Illuminati Obama New World Order Agenda 2012 Exposedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjCiz47_PTY

The Prophecies and Revelations of Saint Bridget (Birgitta) of Swedenhttp://www.saintbirgitta.com/

Yahuwah - Yahushuahttp://followersofyah.com/

Listen to the discussion--lessons learned in 2009--1/18/2010

The facts about the health care bill!

We're The Government and You're Not

Stand up for America

keep the fire burning

keep the fire burning
Keeping alive the burning desire for freedom

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Is Barack IN Bed--so to speak --With Juliam Assange?

Is Barack Obama In Bed—so to speak—With Julian Assange?


Predictably, Joan Swirsky's new release is a bombshell! It is a piece that should be preserved for history in our Library of Congress. Please take the time during this busy Christmas season to read Joan's exceptional commentary and share it with as many as you can. This column proves again why those who love her faithfully call her our 'Joan of America!' WHY?.........because we can trust Joan's vigilance as an intrepid warrior against all that threatens our liberty, national sovereignty and continued freedom, and because we can trust all that she reports. Each piece of information is assiduously backed by factual original sourcing............and because Joan 'never sleeps' when it comes to serving, protecting and defending America!
That's why!

God Save America !

Barack Obama In Bed—so to speak—With Julian Assange?
Joan Swirsky, CFP.com

The fanatical hard Left—those communists, socialists, and radicals currently in power—view anything that is bad for our country—massive Intelligence leaks, disastrous oil spills, escalating unemployment, chaos on our borders, military setbacks, et al—as a thundering success. To them, anything that undermines the United States brings them closer to their Grand Plan of toppling Big Bad America and transforming it into the kind of totalitarian Banana Republic they never tire of glamorizing.
That’s why it is clear to me that the potential damage from the Australian-born Julian Assange’s release of 250,000 classified State Department and Pentagon cables on November 28—and an equal number last July—is part not only of this Australian’s wish to harm our country but also the American Left’s premeditated and malevolent plan to destroy America. And let us not forget that Assange’s assault began in April 2010 with nearly 80,000 documents “dumped” for public consumption, as well as another 400,000 that the Marxist Assange released in October 2010—all of which he claims are just the tip of the iceberg.

Clearly Assange is delighted that his leaks have gained international attention. And so delighted are the Russians with his anti-American raison d’être that they suggested he be rewarded with a Nobel Prize!

It is obvious that “president” Obama is pleased as well. Hence the complete lack of reaction or sanction not only from Attorney General Eric Holder, who seems never to have met a thug he didn’t like, but especially from Mr. Obama himself, who to this day cannot bring himself to speak out against Assange.

In an article entitled The lunatic who thinks he’s Barack Obama, Spengler writes: “Napoleon was a Lunatic who thought he was Napoleon, and the joke applies to the 44th United States president with a vengeance. What doesn’t the president know, and when didn’t he know it? American foreign policy turned delusional when Barack Obama took office, and the latest batch of leaks suggests that the main source of the delusion is sitting in the Oval Office.”

As for Holder, writer Quin Hillyer elaborates at length in this must-read article on the AG, stating that “the Obama Department of Justice is dangerously politicized, radically leftist, racialist, lawless, and at times corrupt. The good news is that it’s also often incompetent.”

As author and journalist Austin Bay has written: “WikiLeaks harms the US. But the president’s refusal to acknowledge the threats we face is a bigger danger.” Bay calls Obama’s response “weak, wrong-headed and erratic.

“...His secretary of state does not comprehend that America is the subject of the attack, his department of defense is not interested in defending us, and the president himself seems utterly indifferent to the whole affair. All of this underscores the real problem. It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration, which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too often unwilling to act to thwart them.”

Bay’s comments echo those made by Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, who commented to Reuters that it is “not WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange [who is] legally liable, but rather the questionable “adequacy” of U.S. security.

Well far be it for the man who has spent his entire tenure at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to be at all displeased that the WikiLeaks revelations cast our country in the worst possible light. For the past 24 months, after all, he has been:

Apologizing for America.
Denying her exceptionalism.
Undermining our military, as reporter Arnie Rosner describes here in detail.
Suing Arizona for simply upholding federal immigration law.
Kowtowing to and cozily fist-bumping our country’s enemies.
Being as incapable of saluting Congressional Medal of Honor recipient Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta at a recent White House ceremony as he has been at saluting the American flag on numerous occasions, just two examples here and here .
And enacting, as Ben Lieberman chillingly describes, job-killing measures in industries that are the lifeblood of our country, but that he and his fellow environmental radicals revile: oil exploration, factory manufacturing, mining, and fishing
But all this is not surprising, as a new book by Stanley Kurtz—Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism—demonstrates.

Like a rotten fish, the reaction to the whole WikiLeaks thing stinks—as they say—from the head, meaning not only Obama but also his Capo di Tutti Capi, George Soros, whose major role in the political lives of both Hillary and Obama and their historically toxic anti-American agendas has been brilliantly, rivetingly, and illuminatingly spelled out in exquisite detail in The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party by David Horowitz and Richard Poe.

Of course our Secretary of State pretended to be outraged when in truth she and other Leftists in our government are secretly thrilled that America is made to look weak and feckless, with an incredibly incompetent Intelligence system and an indiscriminately murderous Military. Her statement of “outrage” was delivered so robotically that she may as well have been telling a waiter that her tuna-melt was cold.

I’m sure that when both our allies and enemies learned that the treacherous Ms. Hillary was involved in—gasp—treachery, asking for U.N. personnel’s telephone numbers, e-mails, credit card data and frequent-flier numbers, spewing insults at foreign dignitaries, etc., not a single eyebrow was raised in surprise.

As journalist Tyler Durden has written: “When we first heard of the latest Wikileaks `cablegate’ fiasco, we speculated that Hillary Clinton may be forced to resign for what is rapidly becoming the biggest crisis for US foreign policy since the Bay of Pigs. Let’s recall that Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment under somewhat comparable circumstances.”

Rich, is it not, that Hillary sat on Nixon’s impeachment panel, but now this acolyte of anti-American radicals Saul Alinsky and George Soros is being accused of the same rank corruption!?

Liberal writer David Corn seems to think that Hillary’s departure will be just a shade less ignominious than Nixon’s. “Diplomacy is about face,” he writes in the Arizona Sentinel, “and the only way for other nations to save face will be to give them Clinton’s scalp. There is no way that the new WikiLeaks leaks don’t leave Hillary Clinton holding the smoking gun. The time for her departure may come next week or next month, but sooner or later, the weakened and humiliated secretary of state will have to pay.”

Ironic too that the Nixon-era exposés that Woodward and Bernstein were lionized for by the Left, as well as the release of the Pentagon Papers and the Ellsberg Papers, are the same kind of exposés Assange is being vilified for. Leftists still thrill at bad news for America, only not when they’re in power! Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Just who exactly benefits when Hillary is thrown under the bus? Certainly Obama benefits by having a potential rival in 2012 tainted irreparably. What amazing timing that these particular leaks came so closely after the midterms, when the 2012 presidential race de facto began.

Personally, I don’t believe Obama will run again, as I spelled out in my last article, “Obama Won’t Run…His Work Is Done.” But the leaks will keep Hill and Bill, the perpetual thorns in Obama’s side (especially after Bubba stole the show in the White House last week), scrambling to re-burnish her tarnished broomstick image.

But according to Dr. Jack Wheeler, a longtime Washington insider, all the burnishing in the world won’t help. Everyone ”should shout Hallelujah for the enormous act of public service Assange has performed,” Wheeler writes. “He has single-handedly obliterated—as in nuked—Hillary Clinton’s chances for the White House. `The greatest foreign policy disaster in US history` has happened on Hillary’s watch. Any chief executive would have to fire her, and Zero [Wheeler’s name for Obama] needs a scapegoat in any regard. Her political career is over - finita la musica, the Clinton’s music is finished. Thanks, Julian.”

When you think about the magnitude of Assange’s assault on America, you know two things immediately:

Private Bradley Manning, the man accused of disseminating the leaks while pretending to listen to Lady Gaga, was certainly a minor cog (or perhaps scapegoat) in a much huger scenario. Manning’s rank had been reduced and he was considered a potential candidate for discharge for unsatisfactory performance, but strangely retained his clearance. Was that decision made by the same “authority” who knew about but failed to report the terrorist links and jihadist rants of U.S. Army major and psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan, the Palestinian Muslim fanatic who on February 9, 2009, murdered 13 people in cold blood at Fort Hood in Texas?
The suspicions that the torrent of WikiLeaks was orchestrated by the Obama government, with the generous help of a craven left-wing media, are increasingly credible. How else to explain their absolute lack of intervention? When the feds want to stop something or kill someone anywhere in the world—except for Osama bin Laden—poof! But in this case, nothing!
Again, who benefits?

Certainly Obama would benefit by using the leaks as a pretext to abandon our missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving the 50-million people in those countries who tasted democracy for the first time—through the ballot as well as the press—to the predatory machinations of the more feudal hordes who operated with both savagery and impunity before our military campaigns introduced them to the 21st century. Clearly he hates (and is not very proficient in) foreign policy and would love those billions to help support his socialist domestic agenda.
Again, Obama would benefit by using Assange’s abuse of the Internet to actualize his own and his henchmen’s oft-stated desire to censor if not downright control Internet content, especially when it comes to voices that dispute his uber-Leftist policies. Eric Blair has spelled this out in “WikiLeaks Being Used to Justify `Patriot Act` Legislation for Internet.”
And yet again Obama would benefit by delivering to his overseers and puppet masters worldwide publicity for the view they all share: America is bad!
No wonder that the personal flunkies of this regime, who share their anti-American views—most egregiously The New York Times—couldn’t wait to publish leaks potentially damaging to the United States.

As Pamela Geller of AtlasShrugs.com points out, Obama “ignored the whole WikiLeaks issue [but] he could only accomplish this with the tacit support and silence of the media. Once again the criminal media is providing aid and comfort to our enemies. It had to strike you as ironic that the New York Times would not publish the 13,000 Climategate emails because they were `private emails` but they had no problem with the treason of WikiLeaks.”

And as the Gawker website states: Holder said that a “criminal investigation into Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is more than just `saber-rattling’ and Justice Department officials are claiming he violated the Espionage Act. If that’s true, isn’t the New York Times guilty as well? If Holder really believes that the Espionage Act is a constitutional law that ought to be enforced—as opposed to a mere pretext for making Assange’s life as miserable as possible—then he’d better be prepared to go after the New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and El Pais, all of which published the classified cables after being granted early access and were part of a clear conspiracy with Wikileaks to break the Espionage Act. So if it was a crime when Assange obtained the database, why wasn’t it a crime when the Times did?”

Apparently, the The U.S. Air Force is asking the same question, which is why this branch of our military has blocked the website of The New York Times on its computers, because the paper published bits of secret diplomatic cables leaked by secret-sharing site Wikile

Here is a mere smattering of leaks the Times gleefully published:

Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. I wrote about this here in 2005, Geller has documented this fact exhaustively, and Jim Kouri, columnist for The Examiner and Chiefs of Police executive, said that the Wikileaks classified documents “reveal that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq…as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.” No other conclusion but that the Leftist media knew this but withheld it in their shameful obsession to discredit Pres. Bush.
A detailed list of sites throughout the world that U.S. officials say could be vulnerable to terrorist attack.
Cables indicating that the U.S. leaked documents designed to pit Middle East governments against each other.
Sec. of State Clinton’s charges that Saudi Arabia is the Number One financier of terrorist activity “worldwide.”
WikiLeaks Exposes White House’s Conscious Support of Islamists, written by Seth Mandel.
Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, the King of Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak, et al, all placed the threat of a nuclear Iran far ahead of the concern they had, if any, with the Israel-Palestinian issue, practically begging Obama to take military action, to no avail. Former Israeli minister and journalist on Irapundit, Yoram Ettinger writes: “...the [WikiLeaks] documents refute Obama’s fundamental assumptions…that the Palestinian issue is a root cause of Middle East turbulence and anti-Western terrorism; that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are allies of the US; that there is no Islamic terrorism since Islam promotes peace and not terrorism; that there is no Jihadist terrorism since Jihad is a process which purifies the soul; that there is no global terrorism…” Morton A. Klein, the national president of the Zionist Organization of America, says that the Obama Administration “has been cynically using the Iranian nuclear issue as a tool for extracting concessions from Israel, knowing all the while that such concessions bear no relation whatsoever to regional support for confronting Iran. These cables increase the validity of many analysts and journalists views who state that President Obama may be the most hostile president to Israel, ever.”
Tehran has used the Iranian Red Crescent (member of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) to smuggle weapons and Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ forces into Lebanon during the 2006 Hezbollah-Israel war, and into Iraq, to fight against U.S. soldiers.
North Korea is supplying Iran with advanced ballistic missile systems that could accurately hit Tel Aviv or Moscow, and is also playing a significant role in the proliferation of nuclear equipment and ballistic delivery systems in the Middle East.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is “an exceptionally dangerous” Islamist, whose anti-Israel rhetoric derives from a personal, visceral hatred of Israel.
According to Joshuapundit, citing Doug Ross: “Wikileaks Proved Obama Lied Repeatedly About Middle East Policy.” The blog reports that Obama “has a sentimental sympathy for Islam, which explains his coddling of Iran and Pakistan and his animus towards Israel… If you feel like you may have seen this movie before, you have…in the appeasement of Hitler by Britain prior to WWII. Wikileaks, if nothing else, revealed exactly how incompetent and dangerous Barack Obama really is.”
In this video by Dick Morris, Clinton’s former advisor explains why Obama’s disgraceful abandonment of Israel could lead to a “second Holocaust.”
Jim Kouri, mentioned above, reports that this week “a new threat emerged in the world of cybersecurity: `hacktivists` have openly launched retaliatory attacks on businesses, organizations and even governments, shutting down their websites for hours or days, in protest over actions taken against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.”

Given the clear advantage Obama stands to yield from Assange’s leaks, could these attacks also have been coordinated from the White House?

Columnist Daniel Greenfield explains that “the Wikileaks mess is a reminder that the enmity of the International Left did not die when the Soviet Union did. It sends the stark message that we have political enemies who are using the internet to organize their attacks in new and dangerous ways. From Soros to Assange to Chavez, the International Left is a highly active and dangerous foe, and it is working to aid Islamic terrorists…because speaking the truth out loud would be `unhelpful` and embarrassing to the Muslim regimes whom they fear and whose favor they court.”

So true, and I also agree with Vasko Kohlmayer who has called WikiLeaks “Obama’s Katrina” [and] Hillary Clinton “the Michael Brown in this affair.” He goes on to write:

“Our government officials tell us that Assange’s act somehow poses a threat to our national security by undermining America’s foreign policy. One may as well ask: What foreign policy? The cables show something many have always known—that most so-called leaders and politicians are liars, schemers, crooks, egomaniacs, and incompetents.

“Ask yourself this: Who is the greater threat to America? Is it an Australian programmer or Barack Obama? Assange is merely a website operator. He has no backing or powers to inflict harm on this country. Obama, on the other hand, has been using the powers of his office to systematically destroy the American economy, the dollar, our standard of living, and our standing in the world. He has been stoking racial tensions. He has been taking private property of American citizens and giving it to his friends. He and his people have been destroying the values and fabric of American society faster than you can say `bam.’ In reality, it is this regime that is a menace to America.

“But above all, let us not get fooled this time around. The ruling elites will try to play on our patriotic feelings in order to save their skins. Contrary to what you will hear from this administration and its acolytes, WikiLeaks’ disclosures are not a threat to America. But they are an immense threat to the current regime, because they represent a colossal indictment of its incompetence and doltishness.” Amen, Mr. Kohlmayer.

As I stated in my last article, the Left has two bedrock so-called principles, the first being: If it’s bad for America, it’s good! Clearly these leaks are bad for America, which is why I’m firmly convinced that the regime in Washington, D.C. is behind them, or at least complicit, and that indeed Barack Obama is in bed—so to speak—with Julian Assange.

I remember in the mid-seventies hating the Supreme Court decision to allow Nazis to march through the streets of Skokie, Illinois. But I had to agree with the Court that the right of free speech (and assembly) was more important than my personal feelings. And I agree with Fox Business Network’s Judge Andrew Napolitano that Assange has the same right to free speech, objectionable as it may be.

The problem with the WikiLeaks is not that they will threaten our national security. The problem is that our national security is threatened by a far worse menace, specifically by the man I consider a usurper in the White House and his rogue regime.

Writers like me hate to repeat themselves, but I have to end this article the same way I ended another fairly recent article. It is with the three words most deeply in my heart: God Save America!

Joan Swirsky Bio
Joan Swirsky Most recent columns
Joan Swirsky is an award winning author and journalist. Her work can be found at joanswirsky.com

Joan can be reached at joanswirsky@gmail.com

Sunday, November 28, 2010

He's Going Down

America Witnesses the Downfall of “Obama”

By Paul E. Vallely; MG US Army (Ret.)

Yes, America, you are watching while Washington attempts to right itself and Obama self-destructs. What does a country and its citizens do as their nation continues to decline in power, financial stability and security of its people? We at Stand Up America shout aloud that we the people must stay strong and help right the national ship.

The Declaration of Independence states:

“To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”

The ship has been righted to some degree by the November elections but so much more needs to be done.

We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and Halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to lead us down the road of Progressive Socialism and global government initiatives. In our opinion, President Obama, his appointees and his czars must be replaced immediately.

This is the current battle that we Constitutionalists face and we must be aggressive in our efforts. Obama will continue to by pass Congress in his progressive agenda and issue extensive Executive Orders. Congress, you must stand tall for the American people and enjoin the Supreme Court to halt Executive branch violations of law and the Constitution.

Incompetence, corruption and Dishonesty of officials now come into play as relates to our National Security and Economy and is the rationale for resignations and a change of government. My emphasis in this article will be a continued plea for Americans to Demand Resignation of these officials by the people of this country.

We are at a point that if Demand Resignations and a new Congressional make up do change the direction of the country then we must proceed to Impeachment and a serious transfer of Power at the highest levels of government. Obama’s eligibility to be President must be totally vetted to confirm his legitimacy.

Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address:

“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”

Being a representative republic, not a democracy, and “rising up” means other than revolution by use of arms. The people must “rise up” (Stand Up as we say now) from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power…resignation, elections, and impeachment.

The oath is simple and reads:

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder.

The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which granted the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of authority and individual liberty was understood. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution with a certain and meaningful intent for check and balances.

Article One, S5, CII and the 10th Amendment provides the authority but this has been trumped by a system that rewards the powerful. In 1803 each congressional district averaged 38,476 people. In 2010 it is forecast to exceed 710,000. These numbers indicate power growth, and it effectively grew eight fold in the 20th century alone. No wonder our representatives seek to stay in office so long.

Power, money and benefits beyond the reach of most Americans are the basis now for many politicians and revolving door appointees staying in office. They must be termed out. With incumbency comes power. The party in the majority assigns power, so a long-term sitting representative can expect such power. A representative expected to stay in office in the 3rd Congress for approximately two years now expects 12 years, or 6 terms – so much for a “citizen government.”

But this can be changed through grass roots organization and discourse. We must make it a local imperative and movement….of the People…by the People… and for the People.

“We, the People” have had enough.
Enough is Enough.

The Obama White House and identifiable Members of Congress are now on a progressive socialist and treasonous death march and are bankrupting the country beyond expectations. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. “We, the People” cannot necessarily wait for the next round of elections. It is now that many of these public servants (and you know who they are) must put the people and country interests above self-interest by resigning immediately.

A civil uprising is still not out of the question as “pain” grips the country more each day. I am confident resignations will be forthcoming based on the efforts of the people. The 2010 vote is critical. This means raising your voice now to your neighbors, family, co-workers, and friends. Grass roots efforts have begun; it is now time to put this effort into over drive. America, stand tall together and we will weather the storm but we must act now!

If we think that this election has changed Obama’s objective, think again. He will resort to his executive privilege to get his agenda in place from the information that we are receiving. http://standupamericaus.com/america-witnesses-the-downfall-of-obama

Paul Vallely is Chairman of Stand Up America




Monday, November 22, 2010

Is The End Of The Reign Of The Empty Suit Almost Here?

Is The End Of The Reign Of The Empty Suit Almost Here?

The wolves have surrounded Obama from all sides. George Soros has openly declared his disapproval of his hand picked puppet. The "Insider" articles are deliberately being leaked. There's been hints dropped ("Obama becoming unhinged--etc.") on more than one news net work. Obama's enemies are as rapidly increasing in numbers as fast as his failures on the domestic and foreign fronts. I speculate just about all the documentary evidence about his birth, education and other lies and activities--Donald Young etc. have been collected along with many people who are willing to blab for a price. There is a "lame duck" Congress which is in its last gasp. In less than 8 weeks a powerful anti-Obama Congress begins. Strange contrails were seen across the California sky believed by many to have been caused by a Chinese missile.

There is no doubt in my mind that slime ball Soros has bought and owned the Dems for the past several years in preparation for his stealing America to convert into a Fascist country. Now that Obama has failed his puppet master king, Georgy boy has no choice but to take him down--before the "unhinged broken puppet" does any more damage to Georgy's neat little Democratic army. Soros is so upset with the empty suit, he made a strategical blunder by coming out from the shadows and becoming public. That is already beginning to backfire on the first narcissist of the world--Soros.

The Kerchner case is set for hearing this November 23, 2010--just before our great holiday of Thanks. We are all praying they will render a decision to give America cause for Thanks and Rejoicing. Coincidentally and/or simultaneously Obama is out of the country. This gives the master criminals the time to get it all organized. Though we hope and pray the Supreme's will rule in agreement with the Constitution's NBC clause, it may make little difference to Obama's vulnerable position how the dishonorables rule at this time. It appears the empty suit has no way out. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Who knows what is going to come of that but we all have high hopes for some "hope and change."

According to the “insider articles”, Mr. Anonymous said it loud and clear—“if the scandal breaks, it will kick Obama all the way down to the curb.” The stage is being set. My best guess is that the strategic details are already being put into place as to how, when, and where to remove the empty suit with the least amount of damages to the guilty holy high challengers. At this stage, I can only imagine they are throwing “ca ca” at each other in heated debate over how the left over pie will be cut. Among these players I SUSPECT are the Clintons, Biden, Pelosi, stinking Soros, and a few we don't know. Let none of us ever forget when Soros paid for part of the cost of Chelsea Clinton’s wedding and Obama was not invited.

Though I can't put the Kerchner case into the puzzle as clearly as I would like to, I feel it just may be the final chapter of the reign of the empty suit. There are too many wolves with the taste of blood on their tongues circling around a weakened prey.

... and the rest of the 'Story'
without lengthy transcription

~ CK

Have you seen where the GOP in the 112th Congress (a committee) is going to investigate O's eligibility? They have subpoena power, too.
... there’s mention of it in the Globe magazine by SC Rep. James Clyburn, current House Majority Whip.

Clyburn Vows Independence as Assistant Leader
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) created the Assistant Leader post for Clyburn late last week after Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Md.) gained the edge in a divisive battle for Minority Whip in the next Congress.

Dem Whip: GOP majority will issue birther subpoenas - By Jordan Fabian
House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) warned Republicans will investigate President Obama's birthplace if they take over Congress [YES WE CAN!].

Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-emonrat) Warns Republicans Will Investigate Obama Birth Issue…
Clyburn noted that Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the ranking Republican on the House Oversight panel, has said will will issue “subpoenas everywhere” if Republicans win the majority.

Clyburn pursues post as House minority whip
U.S. House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn set up a possible bitter internal struggle among fellow Democrats on Friday by writing his colleagues and asking them to support him as the party's No. 2 leader in the next session of Congress.


Daniel Webster Reveals that the Kerchner Petitioners Have Standing to Demand that Obama Show He Is A “Natural Born Citizen”

The Obama Watch
The Coming Resignation of Barack Obama

DeMint, James "Jim"
U.S. Senator[R] SC, United States

The Response Of The Republican Party... is less than exhilarating.


I'll repost the white paper on anchor babies
- it is constitutional 'from previous interpretation' ...
~ CK

Check out the discussion ''Birthright citizenship' will be target of House GOP majority'
First Order of business for New Congress - "Birthright Citizenship" - What are your thoughts? Mellie

Discussion posted by Asst Natl Dir Mellie:
Posted on Thursday, November 18, 2010 By Rob Hotakainen | McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON — As one of its first acts, the new Congress...

Discussion link:
'Birthright citizenship' will be target of House GOP majority


Here's the actual break on the 11/22/10 story in the Globe

BREAKING NEWS ! We Told You So !
Congressional Research Service CONFIRMS IT !!!

CRS- Members of Congress Internal Memo - What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions

The Right Side of Life
"But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good." — 1 Thes. 5:21

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted
'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office
By Jerome R. Corsi


Obama Birth Certificate Bombshell !

Friday, October 22, 2010

Our SS Checks


We need to keep this fresh in everyone's mind till Nov. The thieves think we will forget about it by Nov. Let's prove them wrong.






Please pass this to ALL your friends and have them


Who by the way, have just voted themselves ANOTHER 3% SALARY INCREASE!!!

We must put a stop to this outright thievery!


All I ask is that you consider the suggestion here. The entire Congress of the United States is corrupt.And I mean both Houses and I mean both major parties. I realize that a few Members of each House are trustworthy,*

But, As a group they are absolutely the most corrupt bunch To ever disgrace our Nation.

In November of 2010 The entire House of Representatives will stand for re-election; All 435 of them.

One third of the Senate, A total of 33 of them, will also stand for re-election.

Vote every incumbent out. And I mean every one of them.
No matter their Party affiliation.

Let's start all over in the House of Representatives with 435 people
Who have absolutely no experience in running that body,
With no political favors owed to anyone but their own constituents.

Let's make them understand that they work for us... They are answerable to us.
And they simply have to run that body with some common sense.

Two years later, in 2012, Vote the next third of the incumbents in the Senate out. We can do the same thing in 2014 and, By that time we will have put all new people in that body as well.

We, the People, Have got to take this Country back and we have to do it peacefully. That's what the Framers of our Constitution envisioned.



Please, If you love this Country, Send this (as I have done) to absolutely everyone Whose email address appears in your address book..This thing can permeate this Country in no time.

Let's make it happen.



Monday, October 18, 2010


"Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?
Forbid it, Almighty God.
I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Convention, March 23, 1775

If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed;
if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly;
you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with
all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival.
There may even be a worse case.
You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory,
because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

Dr. Lyle Rapacki
White House in Disarray - - Open Discussions about Invoking the 25th Amendment


I received the below mentioned information this evening. The contents of this briefing are not mine. The contents and detailed information contained within this briefing come from Mr. Wayne Madsen. Mr. Madsen is aWashington, D.C.-based Investigative Journalist, author and syndicated columnist. He has a background in Military Intelligence associated with the U.S. Navy. Some of the following content already has been reported in The Drudge Report and CNN. Some of the information shared below and reported as previously stated did not materialize. Such are the complexities associated with the art of intelligence gathering and reporting. Most often intelligence gathering, analysis and reporting is similar to putting together a very large jig-saw puzzle without benefit of the cover depicting the scene attempting to be replicated in the puzzle.

Mentioned below are items that have been verified along with circumstances that are appearing more clear and connected. The reader, however, should still be responsible in the coming to terms with the below content, but the information stated herein is most critical and I determined needed to be disseminated. One factor in determining whether to release these contents focused on the possible Constitutional Crisis that could unfold invoking the 25th Amendment tothe Constitution, as well as concerns related to the “Lame-Duck” Congressional Session immediately following the elections in 2-weeks.

You will notice 5-sections besides the information contained below. Within the 5-sections are additional pieces of the puzzle for your consideration. These are sobering times for our Nation, sound and prudent information is most important in navigating the dangerous waters in which we are currently traveling. May the information below prove to be valuable to you as you continue your journey.




By Wayne Madsen

Washington has not witnessed so much top level White House intrigue since October 20, 1973, when a Saturday night saw President Nixon fire the Watergate independent counsel, the U.S. attorney general, and the deputy attorney general in the “Saturday Night Massacre.” Just ten days earlier, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned after being charged with accepting bribes while governor of Maryland.

In the case of President Obama, the senior firings are not happening during a single nght but the recent involuntary sudden departures of the White House chief of staff and national security adviser, along with what WMR can confirm from multiple sources is a president who is suffering from Nixonian levels of paranoia, depression, and schizophrenia, has some top-level administration officials considering the first-ever invocation of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment — the involuntary removal of the president from office. The White House meltdown has the Washington political circuit buzzing under the surface.

Unlike Watergate and the Iran-contra scandal, however, the corporate media is refusing to report on the breakdown of the Obama administration and the internecine political warfare within the Executive Office of the President.

The “Ulsterman” Diary

Like Watergate, the rumors about Obama’s mental health, his lack of interest in the routine tasks of the presidency, and his mistaken belief that the crowds who see him on the campaign trail automatically adore him, are emanating from a “Deep Throat,” a former White House staffer who is providing detailed information on the chaos and in-fighting in the ... Ulsterman has conducted a number of background interviews with the former Obama staffer over the past few weeks, publishing them in a series. WMR has independently confirmed with Washington insiders, some with high-level contacts in the White House, that most of the information in the interviews is correct.

The latest leak from the former White House official has Obama offe.... However, Clinton has no intention of taking the job and may well quit as Secretary of State after the mid-term election, especially if Secretary of Defense Robert Gates leaves earlier than his announced departure of next year and the Democrats suffer a big defeat at the polls on Nov. 2. It is known that Gates does not like the new National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and was not happy that National Security Adviser James Jones was fired earlier than his own planned departure date.

The other Ulsterman interviews are as follows:

White House Insider On Obama: The President Is Losing It Sep. 7

White House Insider Part 2: The President needs to grow up. Sep. 15

White House Insider: What The Hell Have We Done? Sep. 18

White House Insider: The Clintons Are Going For It. Sep. 21

White House Insider: Pelosi and Obama at War Oct. 7

Another similarity to the Watergate crisis is the usual “pre-crisis presence” of Washington Post influence peddler and original “Deep Throat” conjurer Bob Woodward. Woodward’s new book, Obama’s Wars, quoted Jones as calling Obama’s advisers “water bugs,” an utterance that resulted in Jones’s early firing by Obama.

Rahm Emanuel’s firing came after he and Mrs. Obama had a major argument, and the First Lady told Emanuel he had to go “for a reason.” Mrs. Obama reportedly flatly told Emanuel he was “no longer welcome at the White House.” The “Emanuel-running-for-Chicago-mayor” story was mere window dressing to cover up the meltdown in the White House leadership.

The top-level White House resignations, just before a critical mid-term election, are unprecedented even by Watergate standards. The October 1973 White House instability was one year before the 1974 mid-terms, an election that still saw the Republicans suffer tremendous losses in the Congress.

As with “Deep Throat” and other past White House leakers, there is as much speculation on who has been speaking to Ulsterman as there is on the earth-shattering revelations coming out of his or her interviews. The leaker’s information indicates that he or she was relatively high-ranking with access to the inner workings of the Oval Office. The following have all left the White House, some abruptly:

Rahm Emanuel, chief of staff. Resigned effective October 1, 2010.
Retired General James Jones, National Security Adviser. Resignation announced on October 8, 2010.
Ellen Moran, Communications Director, left in April 2009, however, the leaks indicate the Obama “Deep Throat” had more recent
access to the Oval Office. Moran is now chief of Staff to Commerce
Secretary Gary Locke.
Van Jones, special adviser for “Green Jobs.” Left in September 2009, again, too early to have been privy to later inside
Mark Lippert, deputy national security adviser. Left in October 2009 and went from reserve to active status in the US Navy.
Lippert was a “pick-up basketball” partner of Obama during the
David Ogden, Deputy Attorney General. Resigned in February 2010.
Greg Craig, White House Counsel. Craig was forced to announce his resignation in November 2009. Although November 2009 was also
possibly too early for Craig to be the source, he is a consummate
Washington insider who may continue to be privy to information from
within the Oval Office and West Wing.
Peter Orszag, Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Resigned in June 2010. Like Craig, a strong possibility.
Retired Admiral Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence. Resigned in May 2010. Would have had classified access to
White House operations although he did not work in the White House.
Christina Romer, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. Resigned in September 2010.
Larry Summers, Director of National Economic Council. Resignation not to take effect until after November 2 election.
There are also reports that White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs has been told to look for another job. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has announced his decision to leave but with James Jones’s early dismissal, Gates may move up his departure from the Pentagon. David Axelrod plans to leave as early as March 2011 to work, as he has stated, on Obama’s re-election campaign from Chicago.

Obama’s depression and paranoia and Hillary’s intentions

WMR has learned that Obama’s paranoia and severe depression over his correct belief that certain interests are out to get him have been mitigated by First Lady Michelle Obama and domestic policy adviser Valerie Jarrett. Mrs. Obama has been telling Obama that he should forgo a second term because he is “too good for the American people” and he has a future role on a “bigger world stage.”

It is also being reported from White House sources that Hillary Clinton plans to run against Obama in 2012, something WMR previously reported. The reports that Obama has offered Mrs. Clinton the vice presidential position in 2012 is both an attempt at defusing the reports that Clinton, backed by her husband Bill Clinton, are planning a primary challenge to Obama and an attempt to send a message to Biden, who is considered by Obama to be working with the forces arrayed against him.

On August 27, 2010, WMR reported on the Obama-Clinton intrigue: “Informed sources in Washington, DC have told WMR that President Obama has been personally told by a delegation of top Democratic Party financiers that unless he radically changes his economic policies they will bolt from him for another Democratic candidate in 2012. The Democratic money moguls conveyed the warning to Obama in Martha’s Vineyard, where the president and his family are spending their vacation. There are various factions within the Democratic Party that see different scenarios to bail out what many Democrats see as an administration in deep trouble with the electorate. One would have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton move up to replace Vice President Joe Biden on the 2012 ticket with Senator John Kerry becoming Secretary of State. However, WMR has been told that Clinton personally loathes Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and may not want to be part of the 2012 president ticket playing second fiddle to Obama. WMR has also learned that Obama’s reported ‘severe narcissism’ has a number of his cabinet officials and top Democratic fundraisers perplexed. Obama’s refusal to change course because of his ego was discussed at the recent annual Bohemian Grove conclave in northern California, which brings together influential businessmen and politicians from both parties. Top U.S. business leaders openly complained about Obama’s economic policies, with some stating that Obama is, for the business community, the worst president in anyone’s lifetime. They also complained about White House gatekeepers like Emanuel and policy advisers Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod who are preventing access to the Oval Office.

Although such complaints could be expected from Republican businessmen, we have learned that top Democratic businessmen at the Bohemian Grove have told Jarrett, Obama’s chief liaison to them, that all she does is shake them down” for campaign contributions and that the uncertainty on the costs for Obama programs on health care and taxes has prevented the hiring of workers.

WMR has also learned that rather than change course, the White House staff, who are keenly reading anything that is critical of the president, are more interested in exacting revenge for criticism than in changing course. ‘The White House staff are voracious readers who are obsessed with favorable coverage,’ one source said.

The Obama administration’s interest in a favorable public image over all other interests has a number of Democrats running for re-election privately miffed. One change many Democratic politicians and fundraisers would like to see is the replacement of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner with someone with more gravitas and a better handle on fixes for the plummeting economy.”
On January 7, 2010, WMR reported: “WMR has also learned of a schism that has opened up between Obama’s political team of Emanuel, Jarrett, David Axelrod, and White House pollsters and focus group specialists who meet at the White House every Wednesday and the national security team of National Security Adviser Jim Jones, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The national security team is convinced that the political team is only focused on the 2012 re-election campaign and not on pressing national security issues. Brawls have reportedly broken out between the two groups with Emanuel looking for ways to threaten Jones, Gates, and Clinton with retaliation if their criticisms of the political team continues.”

Now that Jones is out, Gates is going — maybe sooner than reported — and Clinton is contemplating leaving and challenging Obama in 2012, the national security team under Biden’s close friend Donilon is now in the hands of a veteran Democratic political team. But the political team has also taken major hits, with Emanuel gone, Axelrod leaving next year, and White House General Counsel Greg Craig having left last January. New Chief of Staff Rouse is a protege of former Senator Tom Daschle and is considered close to Biden’s circle.

Donilon’s wife, Cathy Russell, is Biden’s chief of staff and his brother, Mike Donilon, a long-time Democratic campaign consultant who advised Bill Clinton in his 1992 presidential campaign, is counselor to the vice president.

John O. Brennan, Obama’s deputy national security adviser for Homeland Security and Counter-terrorism, is also under pressure to resign. Brennan, after retiring as interim chief of the National Counter-terrorism Center at the CIA in 2005, became CEO of The Analysis Corporation. Brennan’s firm’s employees were among those cited in rifling through Obama’s State Department passport files in January 2008.

It was never ascertained what information was gleaned from Obama’s files and possibly those of his mother, grandfather, and grandmother. However, WMR has learned that Obama’s past is curently of interest to individuals linked closely to the CIA.

Crisis management in the White House

The White House team now consists of Biden’s circle of Donilon and Rouse, the Obama circle of Michelle Obama, Jarrett, and an increasingly weakened Axelrod, and those in the middle who are not sure about the future of the administration.

Mrs. Obama and, to a lesser extent, Jarrett, have tried to smooth things over between people like Vice President Biden and chief of staff Pete Rouse on one hand and President Obama, who is detached from his duties, and, according to the former White House staffer who is talking to Ulsterman, extremely lazy, only interested in watching ESPN and discussing sports, and playing golf, and doing what he is most comfortable at: campaigning. Obama clearly wants to run again for president, citing the “adoring crowds” who greet him on the political stump. Mrs. Obama has reportedly told the president that “there are no more adoring crowds.”

Last March, the annual report on the president’s health contaned a reference to drinking. Obama’s doctor urged him to ”Continue smoking cessation efforts, a daily exercise program, healthy diet, moderation in alcohol intake. . .” WMR has been told by informed sources that Obama’s drinking has, on occasion, been more than moderate.
Previously, WMR reported that Michelle has told the president that he can make more money after one term as president than Bill Clinton has made after two terms. Privately, the First Lady has made no secret of her dislike of her role as First Lady and the constraints it has put on her own ability to make money. In a book about French First Lady Carla Bruni, “Carla and the Ambitious,” Mrs. Bruni-Sarkozy reportedly said that Mrs. Obama told her that life in the White House is “hell.” The White House staffer told “Ulsterman” that he was uncomfortable talking about the marital situation between the president and the First Lady, but WMR has previously reported on Obama’s bi-sexuality, his activities with gay members of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ and an uptown Chicago bath house, in addition to his current controversial relationship with his personal trainer, Reggie Love, and a past short relationship with Larry Sinclair.Obama’s depression and lack of interest in his duties have senior administration officials and some Cabinet secretaries considering the invocation of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, which deals with the involuntary removal of the president for physical or mental incapacity.

The first invocation of the Section 4 of the 25th Amendment is on the table
Section 4 has never been invoked. However, on two occasions it was almost invoked on President Reagan, after the March 30, 1981, assassination attempt against Reagan and in 1987 when Howard Baker took over as White House chief of staff from the fired Donald Regan. PBS reported that Baker’s team was shocked over what they heard from Regan’s staff: that “Reagan was ‘inattentive, inept,’ and ‘lazy,’ and Baker should be prepared to invoke the 25th Amendment to relieve him of his duties.”

When asked by the Associated Press in March 1983 about White House plans to invoke Section 4 after his shooting in March 1981, President Reagan responded, “No one has ever mentioned such a thing to me.” White House Chief of Staff James Baker III countered Reagan’s statement by contending that Reagan must have forgot.

During the Bill Clinton impeachment episode, there was talk in the White House of creating the position of a White House psychiatrist who would be empowered to ascertain the mental fitness of the president to serve. Clinton’s self-destructive sexual activities were cited as one reason for such a position. Lyndon Johnson’s war-time depression and Richard Nixon’s paranoia were also given as reasons for an “independent psychiatrist” on the White House staff. The issue returned during President George W. Bush’s term of office with reports of alcoholism and depression.

1972 Democratic vice presidential candidate Senator Thomas Eagleton (D-MO) was stepped down from the ticket after revelations that he had been treated for mental depression. Presidential candidate George McGovern was forced to replace Eagleton with Sargent Shriver.

A March 14, 1999, New York Times report addressed the issue of presidential psychological problems and quoted former Presidents Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford as being against the idea of a White House shrink. Carter was opposed to a mandatory annual psychiatric evaluation as part of the annual physical examination of the president. He told the Times, “No — You don’t have a mandatory requirement in the law to check a President for athlete’s foot,” but he added, “I believe that mental illness should be considered with the same import as physical illness.” Ford also opposed the idea of a presidential psychiatrist, saying, “I don’t see the need for someone in that discipline being assigned specifically to the White House medical office . . . I think I was normal. I think I am still normal. If I had any problem along that line develop, the White House can acquire the best almost instantaneously.” Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) also voiced opposition, saying, “The signal to the world that the American President, the leader of the free world, is having to get advice as to his mental condition might destabilize a lot of things, including stock markets and negotiations.”

Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Carter national security adviser, not rejecting outright the idea of a presidential psychiatrist, said, “The psychiatrist would also probably have to sign a document obligating him to raise an alarm if he detected serious problems that could affect the President’s ability to govern.”

The present talk about invoking Section 4 has made Obama even more paranoid about his enemies, who he feels range from Biden and the Clintons to the banks and Wall Street. Section 4 would allow Vice President Biden, along with a majority of either ‘the principal officers of the executive departments,” the Cabinet or “such other body as Congress may by law provide,” to declare the President disabled by submitting a written declaration to the president of the Senate pro tem Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI), and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Under Section 3 of the 25th Amendment, Vice President Biden would become Acting President.

Section 4 is designed to be invoked if the president’s incapacitation prevents him from discharging the duties of his office. A written declaration to that effect must be presented to Congress. The president may resume exercising the Presidential duties by sending a written declaration to the president of the Senate pro tem and the speaker of the House.

However, should the Vice president and Cabinet remain unsatisfied with the president’s condition, within four days of the president’s declaration that he is fit, may submit another declaration that the president is incapacitated. The Congress must then assemble within 48 hours, if not already in session. Within 21 days of assembling or of receiving the second declaration by the Vice President and the Cabinet, a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress is required to affirm the President as unfit. Upon this finding by the Congress, Section 4 states that the vice president would continue to function as the “Acting President.” If the Republicans win one or both houses of Congress on November 2, a lame duck Democratic-led Senate and House might have to deal with the invocation of Section 3, something that could plunge the country into a constitutional crisis.

If Biden were to become president, he would have to nominate a vice president subject to a majority approval of the Senate and House of Representatives. Again, a lame duck Congress may find itself thrust into approving a vice presidential successor and Biden would likely want such a decision to fall to Democratic-led chambers rather than one or both being controlled by the Republicans. In such an event, Secretary of State Clinton, the senior Cabinet member, may find herself as the favorite.

Current talk in the corporate media about Clinton being offered the vice presidential slot by Obama in 2012, and her rejection of such a scenario, may be part of a campaign to prepare the American people for a vice presidency, not under Obama, but under Biden.

Enter the CIA

In another eerie replay of the Watergate crisis, WMR has learned that the CIA has not sat by idly as the Obama White House has unraveled. WMR has previously reported on Obama’s and his family’s past links to the CIA. However, Langley appears ready to take advantage of the weakening
position of Obama to bring about added uncertainty.

WMR has learned from a reliable intelligence source that the CIA has secretly contracted with a retired top CIA official who was a principal actor in the Iran-contra scandal, to uncover any information that could be damaging to Obama from his past. On the table are any documents and information on Obama’s place of birth, his paternal parentage, and his past employment activities. By contracting outside the CIA’s normal channels, the agency is seeking ”plausible deniability” should documents or information damaging to Obama be uncovered and subsequently leaked to the media.

The retired CIA official has recently been active with a carve-out special Pentagon intelligence-gathering contract approved by his one-time boss at the CIA, then-CIA deputy director Robert Gates, now the defense secretary, and CIA Director Leon Panetta, President Clinton’s White House chief of staff. There is at least $15 million of Pentagon funds unaccounted for in the CIA’s off-the-books intelligence-gathering operation, reported to have officially been for counter-terrorism operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The contractor firm has been involved in domestic and foreign intelligence operations for the CIA and FBI for at least 20 years, including monitoring labor strikes, investigating at least one U.S. Supreme Court nominee, and its linkage to the FBI corruption case involving Boston criminal syndicate boss James “‘Whitey” Bulger.

The scenario of invoking Section 4 of the 25th Amendment is a worst-case scenario but the mere fact that it is “on the table” provides an indication of the current dysfunctional situation in the White House. Democratic Party leaders are scrambling in anticipation of major losses on Nov. 2 in the Congress and state houses. President Obama may soon find himself at the receiving end of senior Democratic Party elders who will bear a “shock therapy” message: “shape up or ship out.”
Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist. He has written for several renowned papers and blogs. Madsen is a regular contributor on Russia Today. He has been a frequent political and national security commentator on Fox News and has also appeared on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera, and MS-NBC.

Madsen has taken on Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity on their television shows. He has been invited to testifty as a witness before the US House of Representatives, the UN Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and an terrorism investigation panel of the French government.

As a U.S. Naval Officer, he managed one of the first computer security programs for the U.S. Navy. He subsequently worked for the National Security Agency, the Naval Data Automation Command, Department of State, RCA Corporation, and Computer Sciences Corporation.

Madsen is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), Association for Intelligence Officers (AFIO), and the National Press Club. He is a regular contributor to Opinion Maker.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Political Correctness is Synonymous with TAQIYA

The only way to solve a problem is to correctly identify the problem. Due to a new insipid method of public control called POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, American citizens no longer have freedom of speech to call a pig a pig. The practice and enforcement of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is synonymous with the Muslim practice of TAQUIYA, OBFUCATION, BALD FACE LYING, CONVULTION OF FACTS, AND MAKING THE INNOCENT LOOK GUILTY. The usurper in chief is a TAQUIYA PRACTICINNG MUSLIM who like all Muslims is totally morally depraved as is their system of SHARIA LAW.

It is no longer a luxury to ignore discovering precisely what SHARIA LAW IS. It is now imperative that every citizen concerned about protecting his/her freedom learn the facts about this archaic and primitive system of government that Islam, “the religion of peace” intends—through infiltration of our government, terror attacks, vulgar Muslim rallies, or building monuments to their murderous crimes at ground zero and elsewhere in the world—to force upon the Western world. They want to destroy 10 centuries of progress by man and return us into slavery.
• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Big Peace, Aug 26th 2010

Sharia for Dummies

By Nonie Darwish

Imam Feisal Abdel Rauf claims that the U.S. Constitution is Sharia compliant. Now let us examine below a few laws of Sharia to see if Imam Rauf is truthful or a fraud:

1 - Jihad defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.

2 - A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.

3 - A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.

4 - A percentage of Zakat (alms) must go towards jihad.

5 - It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.

6 - A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.

7 - The Muslim public must remove the Caliph in one case, if he rejects Islam.

8 - A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.

9 - A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of: 1) an apostasy 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Making vigilante street justice and honor killing acceptable.

10 - A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim.

11- Sharia never abolished slavery and sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.

12 - Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging and other forms of cruel and unusual punishments even for crimes of sin such as adultery.

13 - Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims and must comply to Sharia if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he commits adultery with a Muslim woman or if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.

14 - It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. However, the opposite is not true for Muslims.

15 - A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.

16 - Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.

17 - No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or a bathhouse attendant. Women in such low-level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.

18 - A non-Muslim cannot rule even over a non-Muslims minority.

19 - H***sexuality is punishable by death.

20 - There is no age limit for marriage of girls under Sharia. The marriage contract can take place any time after birth and consummated at age 8 or 9.

21 - Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.

22 - Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.

23 - There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.

24 - A woman inherits half what a man inherits.

25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and she has no right to divorce him even if he is polygamous.

26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs.

27 - A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.

28 - The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.

29- A woman loses custody if she remarries.

30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.

31 - A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.

32 - A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Some schools of Sharia allow the face and some don’t.

33 - A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife caught in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women since he “could be married to the woman he was caught with.”

The above are clear-cut laws in Islam decided by great Imams after years of examination and interpretation of the Quran, Hadith and Mohammed’s life. Now let the learned Imam Rauf tell us what part of the above is compliant with the US constitution?

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Are the candidates complicit in Obama's usurpation?


Here is the acid test. Insist the candidates do the following:

If candidates give you any one of the following answers—then do not vote for him/her
1. Obama is qualified, he is a native citizen
2. All the cases in the courts regarding this issue have been thrown out
3. I don’t want to risk by career by being ridiculed
4. the people voted for him, so he is the will of the people
5. What would happen to the country if it is ruled he is not eligible

This is the acid test that reveals their secret character. Check it out. What is the candidate’s platform? Does their promise list include a willingness to demand Obama produce his documents or step down? When they are out campaigning and fail to mention Obama’s eligibility question, ask they where they stand on it.
If not—then
1. The candidates are complicit in Obama’s usurpation of the government
2. Candidates are in denial
3. Candidates are obfuscating
4. Candidates are placing their careers above country
5. Candidates are deceiving their supporters and voters
6. Candidates are neither different nor better than the corrupt incumbents who violated their oath and duty to protect and serve the Constitution of America and serve their constituents by protecting their best interest.
7. Candidates have already betrayed their country to satisfy their own ambition
8. Candidates will most certainly betray their public trust when confronted with a vote against the public in trade to stay in power

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

While the issues most candidates are claiming they plan to bring forward if elected are basically good they fail to understand that unless Obama is first removed from office they cannot become a reality:

Creating Jobs
"Small businesses and entrepreneurs are the economic engines that will lead us through these difficult times."

Restoring Fiscal Accountability
"When we know where our money is being spent, it'll be a whole lot easier to get people focused on saving money."

California's Water Crisis
"Bringing relief to California farmers in the Central Valley is one of my highest priorities."

Focusing Health Care
"Health care reform should be focused on keeping decisions about care between doctors and patients."
Reducing the Deficit
"Tax, spend and borrow is not a governing philosophy, it's a cycle of dependency."

Energy and the Environment
"Our focus must be to find efficiencies in the energy production sector and invest in innovation."

"Illegal immigration undermines our security."

Protecting America
"Government's first and foremost priority is to protect its citizens. That means defending our nation from threats of all kinds, both domestic and foreign."

Good intentions are all the hopeful candidates asking for the public’s vote are offering. So what is wrong with this platform?

What is wrong is what is missing. What is wrong is what they are conveniently not saying. What they are ignoring is the simple fact they will never accomplish any of these items unless they deal with the most important issue at hand. A is A.

A. The commander and chief is an illegal alien, criminal who does not believe in the above issues. Please take a look at the following video.

The video Obama does not want you to see

Unless every candidate who claims:
"Government's first and foremost priority is to protect its citizens. That means defending our nation from threats of all kinds, both domestic and foreign."
Makes the challenge of Obama’s legitimacy the first priority of his or her platform, then he/she is only fooling the him/herself and the public as well. It is “we the people” who are getting the ride up the creek . . .

B. At this stage any one who is not demanding Obama produce proof of his eligibility is complicit in the treason against America.

Every congress person who failed to demand Obama produce his records prior to counting the votes last January 2009 is guilty of aiding Obama to commit fraud and betrayed his oath of office and his country. Every one should be held accountable. Every hopeful candidate running for office should make this one issue the center piece of his/her platform. Shoving this issue under the bed will not absolve or cleanse the whole deceitful, cowardly bunch of them from of their crimes and their guilt. Of course, you probably think because they all agree that makes them innocent and no crime was committed. As I already said you and all those who think like you are just as guilty for their willingness to agree to “not discuss an issue that has sailed on.”

Breaking news—Obama not born in Hawaii

I love America as I love my family, my life and my home. Watching Obama destroy America on a daily basis is a heartbreaking and debilitating to my soul as if I were watching my children slowly dying of leukemia. As long as there is life in America and me, I will grasp at any sane straw to do my part to take back America and restore America to the great Republic she once was and could be again. This effort begins with you dear candidates.

Let me say. In your eyes and the eyes world, I am nobody but an invisible American citizen who has risen and fallen at the hands of market conditions and wise of ignorant Washington decisions. However, I can write and e-mail my thoughts to America. I assure you this statement will be mailed and e-mailed until the rest of the invisible Americans with a vote read this. This is my patriotic contribution to save America.

If we do the possible; God will do the impossible.

Saturday, May 29, 2010


On May 29, 2010, dennis mchale said…

You are wasting your time and energy on a subject no one cares about. The ship has sailed on the birther issue. It doesn't matter if it is true or not. Obama is the President deal with was is in front of you. If this were the issue on the news this morning, I'd agree, it would be a BIG DEAL and a Special Prosecutor would be warranted. BUT IT IS NOT and WON'T BE. So at this moment the issue of Sestak is a BIGGER DEAL. Blaming other political leaders for not paying attention to the birther issue is fruitless. It will even bring doubt to who you actually support. You need to move on. I was polite in commenting back, but I don't discuss an issue that has sailed on. Sorry Mchale, you don’t get off the hook that easy.

Thank you for the opportunity to answer to you abd all the Obama friends who think andpublish statements like yours.

“Obama is the President deal with was is in front of you.”Isn’t your attitude extremely helpful to the “regime” that uses an old technique hoping that the issue of Obama’s qualifications fade from the public memory, Obama is permitted to continue pretending he is an eligible president because the public has “given up and the White House has moved on as though the scandal were resolved. Isn’t giving up on the pursuit Obama is not eligible to be president precisely what Obama and his regime want you and the public to do?

“You are wasting your time and energy on a subject no one cares about. The ship has sailed on the birther issue.”

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG—The ship has not sailed—only your brain has!
Would you please tell your above statement “No once cares about”--- to

lt. Colonel Lakin who is presently facing a court martial he is wasting his time and energy and career for challenging Obama’s eligibility that “no one cares about”
Rush Limbaugh who only yesterday (May 28, 2010) on his Friday program talked in great deal about Obama’s sealed records and his refusal to produce them so we may verify his alleged credentials.

John Hemenway, Lt. Colonel Lakin’s attorney, whose son John Hemenway Jr. was shot to death a couple of weeks ago in Bedford, Virginia.

Mario Apuzzo who is still valiantly pushing his case representing Charles Kerchener

Larry Sinclair, Leo Donofrio whose case is going to be heard in the Supreme Court, Phil Berg who brought the first ineligibility case to the Supreme Court, Dr. Orly Taitz who has taken a beating bringing it to the court’s attention,

Gary Kreep, WND, (all the Where’s thhe birth certificate billboards around America) and Citizenwells who all are fighting daily to force Obama to produce his sealed records

The 60, 000, 000 and growing number of Americans demeaned and insulted because they are patriotic and courageous enough to ask the questions only to be attacked for doing the right thing

Dennis Mchale, your statement to me advertises your bias and ignorance. Do you really think I am as stupid as you are? Your statement not only makes me suspect regarding to where you loyalty lies but makes every one who read it suspicious of you. I won’t ask you the obvious.

“You are wasting your time and energy. . .”

How demeaning you are to me. Where do you get the idea you have the right to tell me how to use my time and energy? How conceited you are to make that command. You are not only ignorant, you are manipulative. (If you are married, my condolences to your wife.)

If you are not using your time and energy demanding that Obama produce his documents or step down, than you are an Obama enabler, aider and abettor and complicent the greatest crime ever committed against America. You are guilty the first time you decided the “birther issue” faded away and is no longer an issue. You are guilty in the betrayal and treason against your own country. You are part of the problem.
The birther issue will never go away until Obama stands up or steps down. Shame on you Dennis Mchale for giving in so easily to the regime. Where is your persistence and integrity?

“It doesn't matter if it is true or not. . . . .If this were the issue on the news this morning, I'd agree, it would be a BIG DEAL and a Special Prosecutor would be warranted. BUT IT IS NOT and WON'T BE.”
“It doesn't matter if it is true or not.”

The single most important crime in America may have been committed, and covered up and you purport “It doesn’t matter if it is true or Not.” Are you suggesting because it isn’t on main stream biased media (well known for covering up for Obama and his crimes) this crime no longer matters. Are you saying the whore media is making decisions for you and the public becasue it knows best? Are you suggesting because a special prosecutor has not been appointed to investigate Obama’s eligibility—the issue is moot? (No special prosecutor has been appointed for Sestak, either and may never will) Have you forgotten or don’t you realize Eric Holder, head Of DOJ, is in Obama’s front pocket along with most of the American judges Obama has intimidated or bribed? Are you saying if the presidency of the United States is fraudulently obtained thus making American citizens crime victims of the government it doesn’t matter if it is true or not?

If Obama completes his term and if there is a 2012 election and he is reelected a second term (which I doubt would happen), and Obama still hasn’t produced his records—IT STILL MATTERS. IT STILL MATTERS FOR ALL POSTERITY FOR THE HISTORY OF FUTURE AMERICANS AS TO WHAT HAPPENED, AND HOW IT HAPPENED--- THAT AMERICA LOST ITS REPUBLIC and is no longer a free people VIA A POSSIBLE COUP DE ‘ETAT by a group of America hating fascist, communists who changed their name to PROGRESIVES. The world is entitled to the truth. Truth shall set you free! You have the arrogance to lecture me and any other person who is demanding the truth by saying “It doesn’t matter if it is true or not.” May I suggest—not command—wake up!

Where is your moral turpitude? Is it okay with you that in spite of the fact a major crime has been committed against the United States of America and because time has lapsed, and Americans still haven’t been able to bring this to a major media issue and force Obama to trial that absolves the crime? Are you saying you don’t care whether or not Obama is legitimate? Is it okay with you that an imposter remains our president? So let “sail on” and focus of the “Sestak issue” which will be quashed like all other Obama scandals and crimes he has committed to date.
“Blaming other political leaders for not paying attention to the birther issue is fruitless. It will even bring doubt to who you actually support. You need to move on. I was polite in commenting back, but I don't discuss an issue that has sailed on.

You truly suffer from arrogance of your own opinion along with a strong desire to control others. (You have the perfect personality to want to serve on a home owner’s association board so you can harass members because a vine is two inches longer than the rules)

Every congress person who failed to demand Obama produce his records prior to counting the votes last January 2009 is guilty of aiding Obama to commit fraud and betrayed his oath of office and his country. Every one should be held accountable. Every hopeful candidate running for office should make this one issue the center piece of his/her platform. Shoving this issue under the bed will not absolve or cleanse the whole deceitful, cowardly bunch of them from of their crimes and their guilt. Of course, you problably think because they all agree that makes them innocent and no crime was committed. As I already said you and all those who think like you are just as guilty for their willingness to agree to “not discuss an issue that has sailed on.”

You, Dennis Mchale, are not a loyal American patriot. You are doing precisely what Obama wants you to do—tell people to give up—they can’t win. This issue will go no where! Obama is the president—so live with it. Obama must love you. One more item, Dennis Mchale—every one is entitled to his opinion. Every opinion can be challenged.

I will conclude this response with a beautiful quote another Team Sarah posts on my wall:
If we do the possible; God will do the impossible.

I shall post this article on a minimum of 100 inter net sites.

Friday, May 28, 2010


Sestak bribe impeachable—Big Deal

Now that people are looking for excuses to 86 Obama, they are concerned about the ethics of the law. Where were they when Obama’s eligibility question came forward during the campaign? Where are they now? The Sestak scandal is peanuts compared with a man who lied about his background to fraudulently usurp the WH.

Sestak used the action of Rahm Emanuel, Bob Bauer or whomever from the white house to ace Spector. Now he has decided to clam up. What a weasel! Who in their right mind would vote some one to represent him/her knowing full well the guy has neither ethics nor integrity. Just another lying Democrat!

When votes can be purchased for an American president for three cigarettes negotiated by ACORN, then moral turpitude must be questioned. When so many suspicious actions by Sotoero and his thugs came forward regarding O'fraud's moral turpitude and the public voted for what they hoped would be "Santa Clause", in spite of the flagrant criminal incrimination--then I can only say the public got precisely what it deserved. When people choose to vote for race, unknown background, and an empty suit over integrity, experience and moral responsibility they have sold themselves down the road of perfidy.

Now those who didn't vote for him are being penalized by the ignorant who did vote for him. The true evil of this is when people were to convinced to vote against their own best interests believing it was good. So now the press is screaming foul over Sestak! Yeah, right!

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Buzz Lightyear: May 31, 2000 to May 15, 2010

He was left in a crate allowed out only to eat or go to eliminate for the first 8 months of his life.
When I first saw him he looked like a dirty dish rag with toe nails so long He couldn’t walk right. It took almsot ten years to get those toe nails to almost normal.

I was the second human he ever saw. When I tried to hold him, he was so scared he was shaking all the way to the marrow of his bones. When I felt his fear, I knew I had to rescue him ASAP.
His first night in our home he got bath because he smelled so bad. There was no way this scared little guy was going to spend the night in our home smelling worse than fertilizer.

Ben, my husband and I gave him a bath. Before this little white boy had finished his bath, Ben named him Buzz Lightyear. It was late so I went to bed. Ben dried him and held the little guy in his arms until morning. They bonded and had a magical relationship until Buzz died this morning with the two of us at his side.

Buzz was so possessive of my Ben, he wouldn’t allow us to hug and kiss without him. He would jump right into our arms and overwhelm us with his “kisses”. He was just as ready with protection for Ben who was his papa! He knew no fear and if he felt something was threatening his family, he attacked it—even if it was a golf cart going past our back yard.

The dirty dish rag I first saw and brought home became the brightest shining star in our lives. He became the happiest little dog I ever knew. His joy and happiness was contagious. He brought a special dimension to our family. It was accepted he shared in our daily family life and in a way even shared in family decisions—he completed our little family.

Buzz traveled with us every where. When I was driving, Buzz insisted upon sitting at attention on my left leg as if he were driving the truck. Many people used to smile and ask me if Buzz was the driver. Last week when I picked him up from the vet after he had under gone ultra sound, I put him on the passenger side thinking he was too weak to help me drive the truck. He insisted upon his spot and drove the truck with me for the last time in his little life.

He slept on our bed. He considered himself an important part of the family at all times. He was right. He was an important part of our family. We could never bring anything in the house that he didn’t first inspect. He always knew there was a toy or treat for him.

Buzz was the brightest little guy we ever knew. His loyalty and devotion to his family was his reason to live. He was a joyous daily gift in our lives. We all were glad for every day he was in our lives. He will be painfully missed by those who knew and loved him.

Buzz was a white miniature poodle. He is the dog in the photo with me. He will live forever in our hearts.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Challenge to the November Candidates!

America No Longer Has the Luxury of Time to Save Her

Each day Obama is permitted to play President and world emperor, Americans become closer to becoming totally controlled as property of the government. America’s sovereignty is being lost to the UN and ultimately the NWO.

If our freedoms are to be restored and America is to once again become sovereign, then America must remove Obama from office now.

Any doctor will agree to make a cancer patient well again, the malignant tumor must be removed—one way or another. Ignoring the cancer and treating only the symptoms of the cancer may make the patient temporarily feel better but will not stop the symptoms from returning which will only get worse and eventually kill the person.
Obama is to America what cancer is to the human body. Any hopeful candidate who ignores the fact that Obama is the cause of America’s problem and insists in running on fighting the “symptoms” of Obama’s malignant policies, is ignoring the cause and therefore unworthy to serve and unworthy of our vote.

The Grounds to Remove Obama from Office

Speculation based upon abundant conflicting information, the constitution, history & traditions:

Obama is at best is not legally qualified under article II of the Constitution. Obama at worst is an illegal alien.

"Williams cites these facts in support of his assertion:
- Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Party did not certify that Obama qualified to run as a candidate for President of the U.S., but only that Obama was the Democratic Party candidate;
- the news media previously and numerously referred to Obama as “Kenya-born” before he ran for President. Afterwards, “Kenya-born” was dropped;
- Obama has spent over 2 million dollars in hiding what they say exists (his birth certificate) and supposedly have in hand;
- the Justice Department is doing everything they possibly can to keep Americans from pursing Obama’s eligibility in court;
- federal judges have dismissed over 400 hundred court cases on Obama’s eligibility, ruling that these citizens do not have standing to know who is acting as President of the U.S.;
- Michelle Obama has described Barak’s home as being the country of Kenya;" 1.
The Issues:
Republicans and independents are looking forward to the November 2010 elections in hopes of defeating most of their Democrat opponents. They are running on the basic premise that putting them in office is superior to the Democratic incumbents or the Democratic candidates because they will stand up to Obama’s policies and agenda and help restore America to the values, traditions, and constitution. Oh Yeah!

My opinion:
Every candidate is trying to convince voters he/she is patriotic, responsible and accountable, knowledgeable about the Constitution, wants to save America, will place country above career, and, of course, has the ethical strength of character to do the job. Yet, not one candidate in this nation has been willing to identify the problem or have the guts to go after the malignant tumor—Obama!

Not one chicken little candidate has dared to say, “Mr. Obama, release all your records. Show us your long form birth certificate. Prove to the millions of concerned responsible, patriotic Americans you are qualified to be our legal president---or, Mr. Obama, step down—because when I am elected, your legitimacy will be the first item, I will put on the agenda.”

"Williams is not alone, of course, in the conclusion that Obama is an illegitimate President and that his illegitimacy is being covered up by Congress, the federal courts, those in the Republican and Democratic national parties and others. Ever since Obama campaigned for U.S. President, millions in America have raised his eligibility as a fundamental concern for the integrity of the U.S. Constitution and rule of law, all to no avail. "2.

If our candidates refuse to challenge Obama out of fear of the ridicule or name calling they will get from their adversaries, then they have demonstrated they are no better than the incumbents. They, too, are willing to be complicit in this horrendous crime of usurpation by Obama. They reveal how weak of mind and character they are. They show how deeply they lust for power—to the point of compromising their own country and constituents for the price of a political seat—30 pieces of silver!

“Do not be deceived: if Obama is an illegitimate President because he was born in Kenya or some other foreign country, it is not his dirty little secret alone. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of people who know and are in positions of the so-called highest power.”3.

If they claim they would not get the votes if they dared to challenge Obama, the malignant tumor—than it is clear they are putting career above country and will continue to sell America up the creek without a paddle—just like what is being done to us now by the incumbents.

There is no argument. There is no justification—not even the one when they claim Obama is legitimate—to justify their failure to boldly confront the single most important issue in the world today.

If these candidates harbor the idea they secretly believe Obama does not qualify, yet fail to confront this issue with the concept that-- once they are in office, they will be able to serve their country and do more good because they are in office and not a Democrat is self delusional. It is the same self delusional idea the German judge had in Nuremberg when He thought he was being kind to the Jews by sentencing them to a lesser sentence. He knew he was guilty the first time he sentenced an innocent man.

Any candidate who thinks he can treat the symptoms and not the cancer is as guilty as all Congress who failed to demand Obama’s records before they counted the vote, main stream media for both refusing to demand Obama produce his records and denigrating those people who have challenged Obama, and the electoral college who voted for him in spite of receiving certified letters advising them of the crime they were committing if they voted for Obama with out first having vetted him.


“Assume that Obama shows America his birth certificate, and come to find out, his birth certificate proves he is a natural born U.S. citizen. What is to be said of the hundreds of millions of tax payer dollars that were spent to keep America from seeing what they are entitled to see? What is to be said of the federal system that hid the proof from America for so long? What is to be said of the news media who mocked all of you “crazy ‘birthers’” as conspiratorial nut-jobs for making such an issue of Obama’s citizenship? What is to be said of the two major political parties (on the national level) that only perpetuated the mystery and contributed to the shamefulness of the cover up? “4.My Action:

America and the rights of its citizens are degenerating faster than a white tornado. This is happening directly because of the Obama regime. He must be stopped. America no longer has the luxury of time to save her.

Unless any and all hopeful candidates make the issue of Obama refusing to produce all required documents to give America the peace of mind he truly is qualified to be our legal president, they are not getting my vote. I am going to encourage every one I know to do the same. I am going to send this letter to every candidate across the nation and post it everywhere I can right up to November election day.

My Challenge to all Candidates:
If you--candidate hopefuls across America-- really want to take back and restore America, then show us what you got. Let see the stuff you are made of—stand up and shout that Obama has failed to produce one document, and paid millions in legal fees to prevent them from coming forward. Let Obama know that once you are elcted the first item on your agenda will be to demand Obama prove his elilgibility.

So what if they call you names? So what if they laugh at you. (They’re going to call you names any how in hopes of stealing the votes you might get. All candiates are bashed when they are running!) So what if you might not be elected? Isn’t the saving of America more important than anything else in the world?
I assure you, if you stand up to this single issue, you will not only be loved, you will be voted in, because the voters will know you really are qualified to take back and restore America! The voters will know you have the ethics and honor to represent them. They will know you are fearless and will neither be bribed nor intimidated by the Obama regime. This truly will be a win/win for you and your country! God forbid, if you lose the election; have no fear. The world will be at your feet with offers even greater than the post for which you were running!

You will be one of the great heroes who helped save America by removing the malignant cancer-Barack Insane Obama, aka Barry Sotoero, Steve Dunham or?!

1. 2. 3.,4. OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY: HERE'S YOUR SIGN! By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD., April 24, 2010, NewsWithViews.com
If any of you think this article has value, please feel free to use it in your e-mails and post it wherever you can. I do ask that you post it in its entirety and credit usapatriots-shout.

The Obama Deception

Continental congress Live

Obama to sign treaty to give up American sovereignty


For The Record

Search Posts

Medical Martial Law

Obama Health Care Plan is a Duplicate of HItler's Health Care Plan

Obama poisoned his grandmother

Hitler's Health Plan same as Obama's

object width="480" height="295">

We The People Congress.org / blog

USA must Wake Up About Muslims

Must Listen--Here's to You Obama--We Are Not Stupid