We're Losing Our Country

We’re Losing Our Country...
But What Can We Do?
February 23, 2009

From the moment Barack Obama was inaugurated on January 20th, the leftists who control Congress have – at his behest – gone on a drunken binge of runaway spending vis-à-vis an $850-bilion faux “stimulus” program that rewards failure and punishes success. It is already clear that The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act should be renamed The American Relapse-And-Needs-Resuscitation Act, as is evidenced by both the simultaneous plunge of the Dow and the president’s polling numbers, as well as an epidemic case of buyer’s remorse. As Oklahoma Republican Senator Tom Coburn has written, “the stimulus is a step toward a Soviet America.”

Or, as Lenin said, "The way to crush the bourgeoisie [the middle class] is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation."

Or, as Winston Churchill so presciently pronounced: Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”

Writer Randall Hoven has elaborated upon what the president has “accomplished” in his first weeks in office. This is the short list.

▪ Rewarded abortionists by freeing federal funds to pay for abortions both here and overseas.

▪ Rewarded terrorists by not interrogating them too roughly.

▪ Rewarded terrorists by closing Gitmo.

▪ Punished the U.S. military by halting commissions until Gitmo is “reviewed.”

▪ Rewarded the domestically-held terrorist Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri by “reviewing” his case.

▪ Rewarded Gitmo detainee Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, an al-Qaida suspect in USS Cole in 200, that killed 17 US sailors, by dropping charges against him.

▪ Rewarded terrorists from Hamas by granting them up to $20.3 million for the “conflict victims in Gaza."

▪ Rewarded terrorists by establishing a redress process if those suspected of wrongdoing are delayed or prohibited from boarding a flight.

▪ Rewarded female career “victims” by signing the "Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act" so women can wage equal-pay lawsuits, not for up to 180 days but for decades in the past.

▪ Rewarded the American-hating president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, by “reaching out” to him – to which the madman demanded that the U.S. apologize to Iran for its actions for” the past 60 years" and remove all U.S. forces from the Middle East.

▪ Rewarded labor unions by revoking a former executive order that forced employers to notify employees of their rights.

▪ Punished faith-based organizations by equating them with “neighborhood partnerships” like Planned Parenthood and ACORN – treating them “like a house of God, in the eyes of the federal government.”

▪ Punished fair-hiring employers by requiring federal executives to hire union-only members.

▪ Punished the American people by issuing numerous draconian environmental dictates that insure zero energy independence for decades to come, if ever.

In other words, Hoven says, it was all “pay back Democratic special interests...spend really, really huge amounts of other people's money, [and] make terrorism a law-enforcement issue instead of a national-defense issue and watch terrorists and nuclear proliferators be released, from Pakistan to Yemen to Gitmo.”

I haven’t even mentioned how much Obama has also:

▪ Punished Americans by appointing chronic tax cheats and craven lobbyists to his cabinet and as advisors.

▪ Punished Americans by reversing every promise he made about transparency, bipartisanship, and having an economic-growth bill with no pork.

▪ Rewarded terrorists by authorizing $20.3 million to aid Palestinian refugees from Gaza – read Hamas – to “migrate.” But as journalist Judi McLeod and intelligence analyst Michael Travis have asked, “Is Obama opening the floodgates to Hamas” and “What security measures are in place to keep Hamas terrorists from gaining free access into the U.S.?”

▪ Punished Americans by not firing – or even sanctioning – Attorney General Eric Holder, who called America a “nation of cowards.”

▪ Punished Americans by moving the once-objective census process into the White House’s to be overseen by the Chicago-machine flunkie, Rahm Emanuel.

▪ And then there was the cringe-producing embarrassment he caused by granting his first interview to the Arab media, Dubai-based al Arabiya TV, where he proceeded to apologize for America’s “mistakes.”

Vox Clamato en Deserto

On the eve of the “stimulus” bill vote, which took place on February 14, Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren asked Alaska’s Governor Sarah Palin what the president should do.

“He should veto it!” Palin exclaimed. “He should send it back to the lawmakers so they have time to actually read it and understand its impact.” Hers was a lonely voice of opposition, but it resonated with millions of Americans who also wondered how their (overwhelmingly Democrat) elected officials had the gall to vote for a 1,100-page bill they hadn’t read, when recent spending packages of significantly less heft had failed so thunderously:

▪ $180 billion stimulus program in the spring of 2008: Failed.

▪ $345 billion housing bailout from the summer of 2008: Failed.

▪ $700 billion Wall Street bailout from the fall of 2008: Failed.

▪ Grand total: $1.2 trillion in spending: Failed.

Just a few days later, on February 17, Louisiana’s Governor Bobby Jindal suggested that he might not be interested in taking the $4 billion allotted to his state in the “stimulus” package before reviewing each program and determining “what are the strings” attached to it were. And on February 18, according to the Associated Press, a number of other Republican governors said they were considering turning down at least some of the money, questioning if it would help the economy at all.

Of course, it was a Democrat, South Carolina Congressman James Clyburn, who sneaked tucked into the package a proviso that allows state legislatures to override a governor’s decision. It was also Clyburn who said that the refusal of governors to accept the funds was "a slap in the face of African-Americans." To which Kevin Martin, a member of Project 21 – a leading voice of the African-American community since 1992 – replied: "Liberals such as Congressman Clyburn have always employed tactics such as the race card to shame critics into accepting their heavy-handed demands...to use race as a means of cramming it down these governors' throats is reprehensible, and people should take notice as to how far these people are willing to go to get their way."

Indeed. Americans should be celebrating the courage of the Republican governors who have questioned the ability of the bloated, pork-laden, special-interest-favoring bill to create jobs or “save” the economy At this point, their numbers may be small, but their potential to influence other Republicans, Conservatives, and Independents is huge.

Let them know – and encourage their efforts!

Governor Mark Sanford (SC): Tel: 1-803-734-2100; Fax: 1-803-734-5167; E-mail.

Governor Bobby Jindal (LA): E-mail.

Governor Haley Barbour (MISS): Tel: 1-877-405-0733 or1- 601-359-3150.

Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter (ID): Tel: 1-208-334-2100.

Governor Sarah Palin (AK): Tel: 1-907- 465-3500; Fax: 1-907- 465-3532; E-mail.

Governor Mitch Daniels (IN): Tel: 1-317-232-4567; E-mail.

Keep this Contact Your Governor Guide handy.

Don’t Tread on Me

Afraid that the Obama agenda includes trampling on states’ rights, 22 states are declaring sovereignty or planning to. Sovereignty is not the same as secession, in which a state or states threaten to leave the union. Sovereignty is granted under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights. In short, it says that: “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right...”

The states now seeking sovereignty are expressing the fear that a new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted to the government and that states will lose their autonomy. In stark contrast are those who believe that Congress can enact – at the will or whim of the president – just about anything that strikes their socialist fancies.

The states seeking sovereignty believe that if enough states get on board, they could press their claims together and prevail. The federal government, they say, has no physical existence, except for the machinery that runs it, but that the states are the country!

As one blogger stated, “Whether they’re using a stick or a club, the states are drawing a line in the sand and placing the Federal Government on notice.”

To date, the states that are already sovereign, having passed 10th Amendment resolutions in their legislatures, include:

California (CA): Click here for more info.
Texas (TX): Click here.

States claiming sovereignty include:

Arizona (AZ): Click here.
Georgia (GA): Click here.
Michigan (MI): Click here.
Missouri (MO): Click here and Click here.
Montana (MT): Click here.
New Hampshire (NH): Click here.
Oklahoma (OK): Click here.
South Carolina (SC): Click here.
Washington (WA): Click here.

Hawaii (HI) is actually aiming for total sovereignty, as it claims the state was never really a state of the U.S.A. Click here and here.

States that are planning motions toward claiming sovereignty include the following:

Alabama (AL), Alaska (AK), Arkansas (AR), Colorado (CO, Idaho (ID), Indiana (IN), Kansas (KS), Maine (ME), Nevada (NV), Pennsylvania (PA), and Tennessee (TN).

Click here for Source # 1 for the "pending / planning" states and Source # 2 for the "pending / planning" states.

That is almost half our country, as you can see by this map:

And more states are joining the Don’t Tread On Me juggernaut, including Georgia, Oklahoma, and Ohio!

But there is a rub here. A Resolution carries no weight, but only sends a “sense of the state legislature” to the federal government. But a Bill can become a Law. So when you’re contacting your state officials, urge them to introduce a Bill and not a Resolution about Sovereignty and States’ Rights!

According to writer Dave Nalle, it now looks “like at least 22 states have Bills in some stage of development. About half are in the process of being drafted, several are in committee or out for debate, and the pack is being led by Arizona, Oklahoma, and New Hampshire, where the bills have strong support and will likely be voted on within a matter of weeks. As yet, none have passed into law, but we may see that happen in some of the most active states fairly quickly.”

Most of the Resolutions, Nalle says, “are originating from inside legislatures and from established state politicians, specifically in response to concerns about unfunded mandates and excessive burdens placed on the states by the federal government. The expense and partisan character of many of the elements of the stimulus bill is of increasing concern and helping to motivate legislators to pass these state resolutions...while the 10th Amendment is central to their argument, legislators are more concerned about retaining power they see being gradually eroded by the federal government...”

Yes, Your Honor!

It is not only governors and state legislatures waking up to the shock of dealing with a far-left-cum-socialist-cum-Marxist president and a far-left Congress that echoes his contempt for free-market capitalism and the U.S. Constitution. It is also organizations like Patriots for America as well as individual activists. A minister, Christ Otto, started the Red Envelope Project that has already resulted in over 100,000 red envelopes being sent to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue (zip: 20500), which are marked on the back with the simple sentence: “This envelope represents one child who died in abortion...it is empty because that child was unable to offer anything to the world.”

Stephen Pidgeon, a lawyer who has waged one of more than a dozen Supreme Court lawsuits (Broe v. Reed) in an attempt to prove that President Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to hold his office, has launched an effort to empanel a National Grand Jury “to serve as ombudsmen for the citizens of the country in respect to constitutional rights and privileges...and to conduct criminal investigations of members of the federal government, and, if the evidence is sufficient, issue criminal indictments.”

The National Grand Jury, Pidgeon says, “is an entirely independent body. Judges of the Supreme Court, the Courts of Appeal, and the District Courts of the United States, United States Attorneys, and Congress of the United States may act only as advisors. They cannot prevent National Grand Jury action unless that action violates the duly enacted laws as originally created in the United States.”

He says that a National Grand Jury is empowered to:

▪ Inquire into the condition and management of branches of the federal government and its agencies.

▪ Investigate and report on the operations, accounts and records of federal officers, departments, and functions.

▪ Inquire into the willful or corrupt misconduct in office of public officers.

▪ Submit a final report of its findings and recommendations, no later than the end of its term, to the Presiding Juror of the National Grand Jury.

To become a Grand Juror, go to this website: www.DecaLogosIntl.org.

So to all people who wonder “ What can I do?” to reclaim the America they knew and loved it before Obama, I suggest that you join these efforts and also start protests of your own, be they e-mail campaigns, signatures on petitions, letters-to-editors, street demonstrations, and endless petitions to your elected representatives. If they don’t respond to your liking, kick the bums out of office in 2010!

But remember that Obama’s henchmen-and-women “donated” $4-billion dollars to the corrupt Acorn “community agitator organizer” group in their “stimulus” bill, the better to swing the midterms to even more corrupt leftwing legislators. So if you want more of what the president has “offered” us in only four weeks in office – with more horrifying things to follow – vote for anyone but a Democrat!
Social Bookmarking

Joan Swirskey

25 States Declare Sovereignty

25 States Claiming / Planning Sovereignty
(UPDATE 11 – 02/20/09)

*** 25 States already are, are now claiming, or are planning for declaration of sovereignty. ***
NOTE: Sovereignty is NOT the same as Secession. These states (except for Hawaii) are not claiming to leave the union (for now).
All of these ‘movements’ (except for Hawaii) are explicit restatements of what has always been in place, but not necessarily enforced, as detailed by the 10th Amendment. Hawaii is actually aiming for total sovereignty as it is claimed that Hawaii was never really a state of the U.S.A..

However, I believe the intent of these bills is to let the federal government know that the states’ sovereignty will not be overwritten… say in case certain gun ban laws get passed, FOCA-type laws, or other “War Time / Martial Law” type plans come into play. Check them out:

States That Already Are Sovereign / Passed 10th Amendement Restatement Legislature:
- California (CA): [CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO and HERE - result: PASS]
- Texas (TX): [THIS WEBSITE] has good Republic of Texas info… a BILL IS INTRODUCED *NEW*

NATIONAL GRAND JURY DECLARATION

NATIONAL GRAND JURY DECLARATION

Fantastic news! Attorney Stephen Pidgeon is spearheading a NATIONAL GRAND JURY. This is a major step towards establishing a legal foundation upon which to examine the conduct (or misconduct) of the existing government—Congress, Senate, Supreme Court and President.

“Pursuant to First Amendment (The right of the people peaceably to assemble), the Ninth Amendment (The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people), and the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people), this National Grand Jury is convened by natural born citizens of the fifty several states and of the United States of America, seating 50 jurors pursuant to the duties, powers, responsibilities, qualifications as established hereunder for the following purposes:

 To examine all aspects of the federal government by initiating its own investigations.
 To serve as ombudsmen for the citizens of the country in respect to constitutional rights. and privileges established under the organic documents of the United States of America, as properly amended from time to time.
 To conduct criminal investigations of members of the federal government, and, if the evidence is sufficient, issue criminal indictments. . . .


Detailed information about this endeavor is available at decalogosintl.org or go to StephenPidgeon.com.

As many patriots have sadly come to realize, we are no longer under rule of the Republic of America. An imposter and a usurper is now sitting in the Whitehouse aided and abetted by a corrupt and criminal Congress and Senate. We are now under a tyrannical government. Everything they do is illegal and unenforceable. To date citizens have had no legal umbrella upon which it can declare this coup d’état. The declaration and formation of a NATIONAL GRAND JURY which derives its power directly from the 9th and 10th amendments of our Constitution will give American citizens the sanctity and legal power to officially challenge the legality of the current government under the rules of the Constitution.

While this will not be the all powerful whip to strike down this illegal government it will give steel and motivation to other branches of government and patriots to eventually gain the power to remove this usurper from office and begin to restore America the Republic she is.

Mr. Stephen Pidgeon will be the featured guest on www.blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots-shout this Sunday evening, February 22, 2009 between 8 and 10 pm Pacific Standard Time. You may call 646-727-3865 to ask questions.

Obama's Revenge

Obama's Revenge
Joan Swirsky, RED COUNTRY NETWORK

Once upon a time, a white teenager from Kansas got pregnant by her black Kenyan boyfriend, Barack Obama Sr., or was it her husband? Whatever. (I say no whatever because we've never seen either marriage or divorce certificates). Some say the couple was in Kenya visiting relatives when the birth of their son, Barack Obama Jr., occurred. No matter. (I say no matter because we've never seen an authentic birth certificate). By the time the baby was two years old his father abandoned him for his other wife and child in Kenya.

I wonder how toddler Barry felt when his father left him, and never reappeared until a single time when the boy was 10. Bewildered? Sad? Lonely? Angry? What do two-year-olds do with those feelings?

It didn't take long for Barry's mother to meet and marry an Indonesian native named Lolo Soetoro. They moved to Indonesia, where her child became Barry Soetoro, took on Indonesian citizenship, and was presumably schooled in public, Christian, and Muslim schools. (I say presumably because we've never seen those school records). But when Barry was 10 years old, his mother sent him back to the U.S. to be raised by her parents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, although she kept her baby daughter Maya Soetoro with her.

I wonder how the by-now fully-sentient young Barry felt when his mother sent him packing. Sad? Jealous of the baby who remained behind with mommy? Confused and dizzy by the disparate cultures - languages, customs, foods, sights, sounds, schooling - he had experienced? Resentful? What did Barry do with those feelings?

By the time he was 10, the boy had been abandoned three times - by his father, stepfather, and mother. And although he was raised by his white grandparents in Hawaii - where "people of color" were not his color - he found out soon enough that his mixed-race background rendered him, in effect, an outsider. Did that make him feel self-conscious, indignant, victimized?

But he wasn't altogether an outsider. In Hawaii, young Barry met Frank Marshall Thomas, his first and perhaps most influential mentor. The infamous Marshall, a Communist activist (and self-confessed pedophile) taught Barry - was it Obama, Soetero, Dunham? - that white people were the devil incarnate and that blacks were the most "victimized" people on earth.

Yet the abandoned and rejected child was lucky. His white-devil grandparents gave him a comfortable life in Hawaii, and an education that apparently qualified him to attend several prestigious schools - Occidental College in CA, Columbia Univ. in NY City, and Harvard Law School in Cambridge, MA.(I say apparently qualified because we've never seen any of his college transcripts).

BARRY MORPHS INTO BARACK

After his undergraduate days at Columbia, Obama chose not to go to graduate school, but instead held various jobs in the Big Apple and then moved to Chicago to become a community organizer. Although he had been exposed to American exceptionalism through his life in the United States and his privileged education, it is clear that his experiences in impoverished Kenya and totalitarian Indonesia, as well as his exposure to Marshall and the other radicals he had met during his years in New York - among them the unrepentant domestic terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn of Weather Underground infamy - made the deepest and most lasting impressions.

Their messages of American imperialism and its white-devil culture clearly resonated in the thrice-abandoned boy. In his young-adult and adult years, free to choose his friends and pursuits, he opted exclusively for far-left socialists and Marxists, and activities aimed at relieving the suffering of people he perceived to be as victimized as apparently he felt he had been. He understood their feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, and impotent rage, as well as the pain of fatherlessness. After all, his Harvard-educated father consciously chose to leave him. And his mother gave him away. Was that depressing to Barry? Infuriating?

When given the opportunity to join one of dozens of churches in Chicago, Barry - who had morphed into Barack - opted for the Trinity United Church of Christ, which was led by the fire-breathing Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose decades-long anti-American and anti-Semitic rants apparently resonated in Obama's rejected and abandoned heart and soul. (I say apparently resonated because in over 20 years of regular attendance, Obama said he heard nothing inflammatory or anti-American, and we've never seen the videotapes of any sermon, although each one was unfailingly recorded).

"God damn America," Wright raged. "The chickens have come home to roost," he "preached" to his whooping and hollering congregation after 9/11. Obama heard nothing.

But it wasn't only Wright who Obama was attracted to in Chicago. He was also drawn to another hate-spewing radical, Rev. Louis Farrakhan, as well as to the raving Father Michael Phleger, the radical Islamist Khalid Rashidi, his friends and neighbors the Ayers, and to equally-close friends "Tony" and Rita Rezko - Tony being the notorious "fixer" and now-convicted-and-imprisoned felon for fraud, bribery, and money laundering. What did the seemingly mild-mannered Obama find so irresistible in these angry and/or crooked people and others like them? Was it the same thing that a shy man finds in his attraction to a flamboyant girlfriend - and alter-ego, a person who expresses what he really feels but is unable to give voice to?

In these relationships and in community organizing - which offers inner-city mostly-black residents job training, tutoring, and methods to organize tenants'-rights groups and voter-registration drives, etc. - the twenty-something Obama apparently found his calling, and also a renewed and burning ambition.

WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE

While his community-organizing job paid a paltry $12,000 or so per year, Obama somehow managed to pay his way through one of the priciest graduate schools in the world, Harvard Law School. (I say somehow managed because we have no record of his tuition payments). Even more amazing, he became the first black president of the Harvard Law Review without ever producing a written paper - or at least a paper that the public has ever read.

There is a good deal of evidence that Obama's acceptance at Harvard Law - and his tuition - were facilitated by friends who had a vested interest in the community organizer. Among them was Percy Sutton, a former Manhattan borough president and ardent leftist, who was also Malcolm X's lawyer. In an interview last year, the octogenarian Sutton stated: "I was introduced to [Obama] by a friend. The friend's name was Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, and the introduction took place about 20 years ago." Sutton described al-Mansour as "the principle adviser to one of the world's richest men" and suggested that al-Mansour was raising money for Obama. Knowing that Sutton had friends at Harvard, al-Mansour asked him if he would write a letter to Harvard recommending Obama, which Sutton did most agreeably. This took place about 1988 when 27-year-old Obama was applying to Harvard Law.

Journalist Jack Cashill has credibly speculated that Obama's two memoirs were actually written by his pal Bill Ayers, who was and is a University of Illinois at Chicago English professor, having escaped life in prison on a technicality. Two years [after he was admitted to law school], Cashill writes, "while still a law student, Obama improbably received an advance to write a memoir that would be called `Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance,' which was published in 1995." His second memoir, published in 2006, was "The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream." (I suspect Cashill said "improbably received an advance" because, as stated earlier, Obama had not produced even one paper or distinguished himself in any way to have inspired a major publishing company to approach him).

Al this begs the question: Who writes two memoirs about himself before the age of 45? My own speculation is that it could be no one but a narcissist. As most people know in this age of pop psychology, the psychiatric disorder of narcissism derives from the Greek myth in which Narcissus, a handsome young man, became obsessed with himself and fell in love with his own image as he gazed into a pool of water. A lot of people have some degree of narcissism, which is characterized by grandiosity, an unquenchable need for admiration, unhealthy self-absorption, dependence on the affirmation of others, and also a lack of empathy, which is hidden by both personal charm and the kind of earnest language that pretends to "feel your pain."

Or he could be a malignant narcissist., which psychiatrist Dr. Otto Kernberg, a legendary leader in thought disorders, compares to a narcissist on steroids. This variety involves paranoid traits (think of Obama's thin-skinned, quasi-hysterical reactions to Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin), and ego-syntonic aggression, which means the person is perfectly in-sync with people who have the courage he lacks to lash out.

But consider the source! Obama's father was a self-aggrandizing narcissist who thought nothing of throwing his son away to fulfill his own ambitions and his mother also threw him away for the same reason. Talk about DNA, which Obama perfectly exhibited when, during his campaign, he unflinchingly dispensed with both his white grandmother and his black "mentor" Rev. Wright for his personal ambition.

GROOMING THE PERFECT MARXIST CANDIDATE

This leads me to only one conclusion, which I wrote about in a former article: "Obama: The Trojan Horse." My theory is that President Obama's narcissistic charm, even temperament, skill with words (teleprompter included), hunger to please, radical agenda, and subterranean rage at the "unfair" American system have been brilliantly exploited by powerful leftist radicals and Marxists in the United States, who for decades have plotted America's path to socialism. He is their pawn, totally dispensable but handy while the "aura" lasts.

These "handlers" saw in Obama the ideal blank slate on which to actualize their agenda, and they made sure the slate remained blank by concealing (or destroying) any evidence of his past, including his birth certificate, Selective Service record, visa(s), school transcripts, and other vital documents. All of which is costing his moneyed backers - including America-loathing billionaire George Soros - multimillions in lawyers' fees to fight the proliferating lawsuits that seek the truth about this stealth president.

In fact, former ambassador Alan Keyes, one of the many plaintiffs seeking proof of Obama's American citizenship, has reported that Obama's lawyers have now filed a motion "to quash our effort to obtain the relevant documents...[which] confirms Obama's ruthless determination to destroy anyone who continues to seek the information the Constitution requires. Obama thus signals his intent to bring financial ruin on those who won't accept his cover-up of the circumstances of his birth is a tactical escalation. It confirms the common sense suspicion that he won't act forthrightly in this matter because he has something to hide."

It is clear that Obama and his fellow radicals are restive. In the less-than four weeks of his presidency, the new president has taken volumes from the Marxian handbook, which dictates that the stupid masses be blitzed with an overload of information, hollow press conferences, appointments, dismantling of formerly effective national-security programs, et al., in order to set the stage for a massive, Soviet-style takeover of our government, including a civilian national security force that Obama has said should be "just as powerful, strong and well-funded as the U.S. military." Echoes of Nazi Germany in 1938, anyone?

According to writer Kyle-Anne Shrive, in Obama's ascendance:


"We have yet to see a more perfect collision of Murphy's Law with the Peter Principle. In only three weeks' time, [he] has signaled to every terrorist on the planet that we are a sorry, groveling, ashamed nation ready to come to the diplomatic confessional. He is closing Gitmo within one year, has suspended trials there, and dismissed the charges against the U.S.S. Cole plotter. [He] has just put our money where his mouth is and is using $20.3 million to bring in Palestinian refugees from Gaza...[he] had the gall to pronounce the so-called economic stimulus bill absolutely free of `earmarks' and `make-do work'...but according to the Congressional Budget Office [this bill] will do worse to our overall economy than no government action whatsoever."


And Obama has done all this with the predictable double-speak that characterizes malevolent intention, i.e., touting transparency while concealing everything, speaking of integrity while appointing crooks and incompetents riddled with conflicts-of-interest, supporting energy independence while killing off-shore and domestic oil-drilling and nuclear power, and feigning optimism while he speaks of impending "catastrophe" in order to push through a pork-laden, trillion-dollar-plus Stimulus plan that rewards the corrupt voter-fraud organization Acorn with billions and unions with discriminatory union-only labor agreements, paves the way for socialized medicine, and threatens to take away the most cherished rights of We The People.

As blogger Eric Gurr has said: "We still talk about the health care crisis, the environmental crisis, the oil crisis, the banking crisis. Let me tell you my friends you are about to learn the meaning of the only crisis that matters, the survival crisis."

You can be sure that the sad-lonely-angry two-year-old, the jealous-confused-resentful 10-year-old, the self-conscious- cheated-victimized adolescent, and the man who found solace in and identified with his hate-America mentors is now determined to redeem all of his demons.

Unfortunately, he is acting out his rage on free-market capitalism, a free press, property and gun rights, a limited constitutional government, protection of the unborn, and everything else that is good and great about our country.

This is Obama's revenge!

Joan Swirsky (www.joanswirsky.com) is a New York-based author and journalist who can be reached at joansharon@aol.com.

Simulus Plan Illegal No Matter Who Passes It

Stimulus Bill is Illegal

Dear People of Fox News,

I am writing to you because you are our last hope in MSM. We who are profoundly concerned about America and its government watch Fox news more than any other because we believe you have had the courage to broadcast more of what other net works have refused to broadcast. There is still one subject of major crisis to America you along with all other networks have failed to bring forward. It is the single most important subject to America today.

DOES OBAMA MEET THE CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO BE PRESIDENT?

I AND MILLIONS LIKE ME BELIEVE HE IS A USURPER AND AMERICA IS NOW A TYRANNY INSTEAD OF AN AMERICAN REPUBLIC.

AS IT STANDS NOW, OBAMA HAS FAILED TO PROVE HE IS EVEN A CITIZEN, LET ALONE ELIGBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. THEREFORE, WE BELIEVE OBAMA IS AN IMPOSTER AND USURPER. THIS MEANS EVERY DIRECTIVE, BILL OR ORDER HE MAKES IS ILLEGAL AND CANNOT TO BE MADE INTO LAW. THIS MEANS THE SO CALLED STIMILULUS BILL AND ANY OTHER LAW OR BILL PASSED BY CONGRESS SINCE HE HAS TAKEN OFFICE IS ILLEGAL AND UNENFORCEABLE.

There are over 100 law suits challenging Obama’s eligibility. There are several legitimate groups organized to bring this to public attention. There are thousands of extremely well written articles about Obama’s ineligibility to be president. There are hundreds of web sites and millions of bloggers discussing this subject. Yesterday, the state of Oklahoma put a declaration to its Senate to formally state its sovereignty from the US Government because of Obama’s failure to qualify for presidency for voting (enclosed is the document that details Oklahoma’s position). This is the first step to secession. Twentyone other states are planning to do the same. You, being in the business of news, are probably more aware of these issues than I am.

You have been contacted via letter, telephone calls, and e-mails asking you to please cover this story. Those of the public who actually did receive answers from you were told the law suits were dismissed and/or he does qualify. Others merely received hang ups from your staff. The main reason I am writing to you today is to ask you: Why you do not broadcast this story? It is the greatest scandal and threat to America since the Civil War! Even if many of the law suits have been dismissed, it is still a fact the lawsuits were filed. If silly Paris Hilton farts, the news media is all over it. We believe had the voting public been aware of this fact prior to the election he would not have won the election. We believe that voters who voted for him discover it now would not want him in office.

The so called President of the United States being sued on the basis of not being a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN in the Supreme courts and the facts –FACTS, I REPEAT—FACTS—OBAMA TO THIS DATE HAS NOT PRODUCED HIS VAULT COPY BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND OTHER REQUESTED DOCUMENTS AND HAS SPENT OVER $800,000 IN LEGAL FEES FIGHTING THE EVER GROWING LAW SUITS is totally ignored? THE GREAT SILENCE OF THE ENTIRE NEWS MEDIA IS CAUSE FOR DEEP PUBLIC SUSPICIAN. WHEN NOT EVEN FOX NEWS MENTIONS THIS BOILING CALDRON OF LAWYERS AND CITIZENS FIGHTING IN THE COURTS WITH ALL THEY GOT TO GET THIS IMPOSTER VETTED, SOMETHING IS VERY VERY WRONG. WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS? WHY IS THE GREATEST STORY IN AMERICAN HISTORY SILENCED? SINCE WHEN CAN JOURNALISTS AND NEWS NETWORKS BE SO THOROUGHLY SILENCED THEY PRETEND THAT A USURPER IS PRESIDENT? SOMETHING IS VERY, VERY, WRONG! The continued silence of MSM makes the media an aider and abettor in the monstrous conspiracy and crime against America.

For God’s sake, this is the NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA AND THE RIGHTS OF EVERY AMERICAN TO BE PROTECTED UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION THAT NO LONGER EXISTS. THE GREATEST NATIONAL CATASTROPHE HAS HAPPENED TO AMERICA, A USURPER IN THE WHITEHOUSE AND YOU MSM HAVE BECOME A SILENT COCONSPIRATOR WITH THE TRAITORS AND TREASONOUS GOVENRMENT. America is on the verge of a Revolution or Civil War because our current government is no longer a Republic.

ALL WE ARE ASKING YOU TO DO IS SIMPLY REPORT THE STORY. TELL THE VIEWERS ABOUT THE LAW SUITS. TELL AMERICANS BARRY SOTOERO HAS NOT PRODUCED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND MAY NOT BE A CITIZEN. WHY CAN’T YOU DO THAT?
Sincerely,

Therese Daniels
www.usapatriots-shout.blogspot.com

The Luxury of Illegal Alliens

Boy, was I confused. I have been hammered with the propaganda that it is the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us. I now find that to be RIDICULOUS.


I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. I also have included the URL's for verification of all the following facts.


1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.

Verify at: http://tinyurl.com/zob77


2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.


Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html


3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.


Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html



4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.0.html


5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.


Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html


6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.


Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html


7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.


Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html


8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.


Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html


9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.


Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html


10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US.


Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html


11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.


Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://tinyurl.com/t9sht



12. The National policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'


Verify at:
http://www.nationalpolicyinsti tute.org/pdf/deportation.pdf



13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.


Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/ niht.htm



14. 'The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One million sex crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'


Verify at: http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml

The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.


Are we THAT stupid?

If this doesn't bother you then just delete the message. If, on the other hand, it does raise the hair on the back of your neck, I hope you forward it to every legal resident in the country including every elected representative in Washington, D.C. - five times a week for as long as it takes to restore some semblance of intelligence in our policies and enforcement thereof.

THE NATIONAL CATASTROPHE IS ALREADY HERE--A USURPER IN THE WHITEHOUSE

THE NATIONAL CATASTOPHE IS ALREADY HERE---A USURPER IN THE WHITEHOUSE

Starting out as a young business woman several years ago, I was taught there is never a deal so good that can’t be walked away from if it has to be done right away. Obama’s attempt to rush down America’s already sore throats the “stinkulus plan” should be the brightest of all the red flags about this plan. Obama claims if it is not passed there will be a “national catastrophe”. The NATIONAL CATASTROPHE IS THE STINKULUS PLAN. THE NATIONAL CATASTROPHE IS THE USURPER IN THE WHITEHOUSE. OUR ONLY FOCUS SHOULD BE TO REMOVE HIM.

Now Pelosi, the Queen of Hearts in Nancy in Washington Land and her side kick Reid are claiming they have come to a deal. A deal that no one yet knows the details or when or if they every will know the details. Just sign on the dotted line and we will all be forever happy. Now doesn’t this smack of another Barry Sotoero flim/flam? Never mind troubling your selves with my birth certificate and other required documents—just take my word for it!

OBAMA AND HIS THUGS ARE ABSOLUTELY RECKLESS. THERE IS NO MAJOR ECONOMIC CRISIS THAT WASN’T FIRST CREATED BY OBAMA TO SABOTAGE AMERICA IN SEPTEMBER TO WIN THE ELECTION. THERE IS NO MAJOR NATIONAL CRISIS THAT WE CAN NOT RESOLVE WITH OUT THE HELP OF A STINKULUS PLAN DESIGNED TO PERMANENTLY HARM ARMERICA. LET GOVERNMENT BACK AWAY, AND DO NOTHING FOR SIX MONTHS AND AMERICA WILL BEGIN TO RIGHT ITSELF.

THE STINKULUS PLAN IS NOTHING MORE THAN A GRAB FOR TOTAL POWER, CONTROL AND DESTRUCTION OF WHAT LITTLE IS LEFT OF THE AMERICAN GOVENRMENT. THE STINKULUS PLAN IS NOTHING MORE THAN PROOF OF THE URGENCY TO REMORE THIS MAD MAN FROM OFFICE.

OBAMA MUST BE ARRESTED AND TAKEN OUT OF OFFICE. OUR FOCUS SHOULD BE TO BOMBARD CONGRESS, SENATE, MSM AND WHOMEVER TO REMOVE THE USURPER. WE MUST NEVER LOSE SITE OF THE ONE AND ONLY GOAL NECESSARY. THE PROS AND CONS OF THE STINKULUS PLAN ARE MOOT IF WE CAN FIND A WAY TO TAKE THE USURPER OUT.

USA Patriots shout

America Comes Apart at the Seams

One more loss as America is comes apart at the seams . . .

Leo C Donofrio, Obama, Natural Born Citizen issue, February 1, 2009, SCOTUS, US Supreme Court, Donofrio steps away from POTUS eligibility issue, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com,Military, disobey orders, I have absolutely NO faith in the US legal system
February 2, 2009 •

• Leo Donofrio, do what you have to do.

Please know this: You have up lifted and inspired thousands maybe millions of people by the work you have done in challenging Obama’s eligibility in the Supreme Court. Because of your efforts many sleeping Americans have awakened and taken up the cause. The ripple effect you have created may return to you in the most glorious ways because you have done so much good. You can not imagine how many and deeply people love you.

I couldn’t agree more with you about the loss of justice in our system. The advice you give the military is so wise. However, I do hope the military will pursue their own legal agenda and perhaps choose–in a legal way–to challenge Obama.

I truly believe that the Supreme Court will hear some of the Obama challenge cases as a matter of formality or show to say to the public we heard them. However, I believe the Supreme Court will merely invent legal language to claim that Obama does meet the requirements to be eligible to be President. That will be that final official blow to our precious Constitution. As far as I am concerned we are already a government of tyranny.

I for one, will continue the fight to find America once again. All I have is my life, my thoughts, and my voice. So I write on the blogs and broadcast my weekly Sunday night program. I know only a handful of people hear my program. However, I feel, like Philip Berg the 300,000,000 Americans are worth fighting for. Maybe the handful of people who hear me, may pass the torch to another handful of patriots.
Mr. Donofrio, follow your wonderful talents and visions. I, too, used to be artist. No matter what you do, I believe the world will benefit from you. You are one of few truly blessed souls who give so much by pursuit of your own talents and abilities. Know you may change your mind and occasionally return to inpsire, guide and educate us as you have done to date. We will always be in need of your profound knowledge.
Last night I broad cast my talk radio program and these were the results. Next week I am going to dedicate the program to you. The program’s topics were as follows:

The “Stinkulus Plan”
Is Oaklahoma going to secede
from the Union?

Last night’s broadcast was fantastic! There were lot’s listener participation, passionate discussion, and superior information shared. A couple of “obots” called trying to invalidate we patriots who have the naivete to still believe in the Constitution and a government by rule of law!

The “obots” usually complaint was;

“Tough luck. Get over it. Obama is our President. So live with it.”

Oh Yea! That’s what you think. I shouted so I could be heard in the universe!

“Listen hear, Obot. OBAMA IS NOT THE PRESIDENT. HE IS A USURPER! HE IS A FRAUD. HE IS AN IMPOSTER. IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO ME THAT A CORRUPT CONGRESS, SUPREME COURT, SENATE AND JUDGES ARE CHOOSING TO DENY, IGNORE, OR CONVOLUTE THE FACT THAT OBAMA DOES NOT QUALIFY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER THE ARTICLES OF THE CONSTITUION. HE IS STILL NOT THE PRESIDENT!

WHATEVER HE DOES IS ILLEGAL. AS LONG AS THIS IMPOSTER REMAINS IN THE WHITEHOUSE AMERICA IS IN CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER. AMERICAN NO LONGER HAS A LEGAL GOVERNMENT. AMERICA IS NOW IN A STATE OF TYRANNY. NOT ONE CITIZEN IS SAFE BECAUSE HE NO LONGER HAS THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

USA PATRIOTS SHOUT
Therese Daniels
Copyright, February 2, 2009

Thank you, Team Sarah Member!

In less than 2 weeks on the job, voters not too happy with President Barack Obama's performance. 52% say he's doing a bad job!Not only can you vote on Fox News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/index.html

But Buzz this story up as well!

http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:99d1febfbc0f579a6c3bb3559bbe7ace:ed75be825b1644ae14526b5a2c888840?usc=1


We need all hands on deck with this one. Obviously vote "poor" for our Dear Leader!

Currently 52 percent say Obama is doing "poor" (31%) or "not good" (21%)

Only 39 percent think he is doing a good job! "excellent" (8%) and "very good" (31%)

I think Bush had a better rating than that when he left office!!

TED, SAID

The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

February 1, 2009 4:47 PM

This was posted below by program announcement which I deleted. It is such valuable information, I am posting it here. Thank you Ted, for your contribution.

Look What Austraila is Saying. Don't Our Politicians have any Shame?

Obama, Oaths of Allegiance, the UCMJ, Unlawful Orders, Joe the Private, and a Call to Protect the Republic
Written by Zach Jones
Throughout the history of America, there have been those special individuals of courage and principle who have answered the call to protect the Republic. I believe in these extraordinary times, the call to protect the Republic is being sounded again. In over 30 courts throughout these United States, lawsuits have been trying to be heard on the merits of the primary allegation that Barack Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements to serve as President because he is not a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States.

To date, the call to protect the Republic has been primarily sounded by concerned lawyers and those they represent. The Plaintiffs in these actions are as diverse as is America. They represent different political ideologies, races, ethic backgrounds, religious backgrounds and regions. However, the courts have thus far been silent, relying on technical legal arguments to prevent the airing of citizens’ concerns in the public square. Normally in America, these Plaintiffs would have had strong allies in the American Media. However, in these extraordinary times the media have thrown in their lot with Obama and the extreme wing of the Democratic Party. (The reasons for the media abandoning the profession of journalism are a bit complicated and should the subject of another article.)

Nevertheless, these attorneys and Plaintiffs have not been the only ones demanding the government make certain that America’s Constitution has been complied with. There are thousands of supporters across America giving voice to these concerns. In fact, World Net Daily has had a petition drive ongoing and to date, over 226,000 people have signed. The American citizens who are bringing these lawsuits, signing petitions, and searching for alternatives to the main stream media are mostly ordinary Americans, with ordinary families, who are extremely concerned that our Constitution has been violated and undermined.


Most of these ordinary Americans have been relying solely on the courts to protect the Republic and are extremely frustrated that the courts are thwarting the basic, simple, common sense resolutions of this vital issue. One such ordinary American is Lt Col. David A. Earl-Graef, who recently expressed his concerns and disappointment with the courts in an open letter to Chief Justice John Roberts. The only thing these citizens and Lt Col. Earl-Graef are asking is that Barack Obama answer the allegations and establish with his long form Hawaiian birth certificate that he is a “Natural Born Citizen”. To date, this has not been done. It is important to note that instead of simply providing proof, Obama has resisted this request with legal teams and hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The circumstance that a person might be serving as President of the United States who is not a “Natural Born Citizen” creates a Constitutional crisis of enormous proportion in that every legislative act such a person signs and every “order” he or she gives is invalid and “unlawful”.

This last word “unlawful” is of the utmost importance and gives rise to questions of individual responsibility, criminal liability and morality on the battlefield. It is well established that when an “order” is given to an individual soldier, such an order (in effect) comes through the entire chain of command. Consider that:

…Authority is the legitimate power of leaders to direct soldiers or to take action within the scope of their position. Military authority begins with the Constitution, which divides it between Congress and the President. The President, as commander in chief, commands the armed forces, including the Army. The authority from the Commander-in-Chief extends through the chain of command, with the assistance of the NCO support channel, to the squad, section or team leader who then directs and supervises the actions of individual soldiers. When you say, “PFC Lee, you and PFC Johnson start filling sandbags; SPC Garcia and SPC Smith will provide security from that hill,” you are turning into action the orders of the entire chain of command.…

It is also well established that individual soldier have a legal and moral obligation NOT to follow “unlawful orders”.

…509. Defense of Superior Orders … b. In considering the question whether a superior order constitutes a valid defense, the court shall take into consideration the fact that obedience to lawful military orders is the duty of every member of the armed forces; that the latter cannot be expected, in conditions of war discipline, to weigh scrupulously the legal merits of the orders received; that certain rules of warfare may be controversial; or that an act otherwise amounting to a war crime may be done in obedience to orders conceived as a measure of reprisal. At the same time it must be borne in mind that members of the armed forces are bound to obey only lawful orders (e. g., UCMJ, Art. 92)….


So the question becomes, when does an individual soldier, Joe the Private, have sufficient reason to know or believe that an order flowing down the “chain of command” from the Office of the President constitutes an “unlawful order”?


Does it happen when an individual member of the military comes across reports on the internet of more than 30 lawsuits challenging the eligibility of the current occupant of the Oval Office?

Does it happen when superior Officers such as Lt Col. Earl-Graef start raising their heart felt concerns?

Does it matter that the main stream media may be deliberately ignoring the issue for their own purposes?


What should the individual soldier do if he or she in their heart of hearts believes the President of the United States is a fraud and cannot issue any “lawful order”?


This is the extremely difficult and perilous judgment call that every young military man or woman who is trying to do what they believe is right could be facing! Facing the possibility of jail and losing career or following one’s convictions, it doesn’t get much tougher than that.

It is very troubling that Obama shows no consideration for the position he puts the members of our military in by his refusal to provide any credible evidence demonstrating his status as a “Natural Born Citizen”.

So what’s our serviceman or woman to do?

Almost everyone involved in this issue has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution and may also have additional ethical obligations. The lawyers who are representing the Plaintiffs in these actions are bound by their rules of ethics to not bring “frivolous actions”. The Judges have also sworn oaths to defend the Constitution. Obama has sworn in election forms that he is eligible to run for the Office of President. And the individual soldier has also sworn his or her own oath to defend the Constitution:

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.


The enlisted service member’s oath provides explicitly that he or she “will obey the orders of the President of the United States”. Therefore, if Obama is not constitutionally eligible to serve as President, then Joe the Private is facing a huge conflict regarding his sworn allegiance. It is interesting to note that the oath that Officers swear to does not include the language that they will “obey the orders of the President”.


What a horrific situation Obama has created for our military men and women! The soldier has his or her oath to consider, his or her duty to follow “lawful orders”, his or her duty to NOT follow “unlawful orders”, and the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) that could take a huge bite out of his or her liberty and career.


The intention of the each individual soldier is the key to him or her making any noise what so ever! Every soldier must be very careful because they are walking a tightrope with only sharks below. The soldier could be determined in a Court Martial to be fulfilling the obligations of their oaths or they could be found to be committing mutiny or sedition under the UCMJ!


The UCMJ provides:


…894. ART. 94. MUTINY OR SEDITION

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition; …



There is however another important group of people (besides the civilian Judges) who, I believe, have the power to investigate and resolve Obama’s ineligibility issue. If just one person of this group has courage and conviction for the truth, he or she can remove the possibility that a another member of our armed forces, acting alone, would decide that they must as a matter of conscience refuse to obey an “Order” coming from Mr. Obama.


This group is made up of every person in the military chain of command that has the power to convene a “Court of Inquiry” under the Uniform Code of Military Justice!


The UCMJ provides for Courts of Inquiry as follows:

935. ART. 135. COURTS OF INQUIRY

(a) Courts of inquiry to investigate any matter may be convened by any person authorized to convene a general court-martial or by any other person designated by the Secretary concerned for that purpose, whether or not the persons involved have requested such an inquiry.

So who are these men and women of the military who have the power to convene a Court of Inquiry? “Any person authorized to convene a general courts-martial” can convene such an inquiry.

They are listed in the UCMJ:


822. ARTICLE 22. WHO MAY CONVENE GENERAL COURTS-MARTIAL

(a) General courts-martial may be convened by--

(1) the President of the United States;

(2) the Secretary of Defense;

(3) the commanding officer of a unified or specified combatant command;

(4) the Secretary concerned;

(5) the commanding officer of a Territorial Department, an Army Group, an Army, an Army Corps, a division, a separate brigade, or a corresponding unit of the Army or Marine Corps;

(6) the commander in chief of a fleet; the commanding officer of a naval station or larger activity of the Navy beyond the United States.

(7) the commanding officer of an air command, an air force, an air division, or a separate wing of the Air Force or Marine Corps;

(8) any other commanding officer designated by the Secretary concerned; or

(9) any other commanding officer in any of the armed forces when empowered by the President.


Therefore, in order to prevent the terrible consequences that could befall the individual Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine who in good faith refuses to follow an order that he or she believes to be an “unlawful order” given by Barack Obama, I urge those listed above to remove this burden from the shoulders of our military and investigate the allegations against Barack Obama to determine once and for all his eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency. Again I say, Mr. Obama could easily do the right thing and demonstrate his eligibility by answering the allegations made against him!

Just a thought as to a possible starting point for a Court of Inquiry:

..883. ART. 83. FRAUDULENT ENLISTMENT, APPOINTMENT, OR SEPARATION

Any person who--

(1) procures his own enlistment or appointment in the armed forces by knowingly false representation or deliberate concealment as to his qualifications for the enlistment or appointment and receives pay or allowances thereunder…

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the status as Commander and Chief of the Military an appointment conferred upon the person who legitimately holds the Office of the Presidency?


If this does not suffice as legal justification to investigate Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office and/or issue lawful orders, I’m sure there are some brilliant JAG Officers who can provide much better legal arguments for a Court of Inquiry. (Maybe Article 134?)

In conclusion, and to eliminate any possible misunderstandings (CYA), it is solely my intention to follow the oath that I took when I joined the Navy as a 19 year old and to protect the Constitution of the United States of America. It is NOT my intention to express anything that could be remotely be interpreted as an “intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority”!


Further, I would like to request that everyone who is remotely concerned become more aware regarding the eligibility lawsuits that are ongoing such as Berg v Obama, Hollister v Barry Soetoro, Broe v Reed, Kerchner et al v. Obama and research this important issue. One thing is certain, the American media will not be telling the complete story about this issue anytime soon.


Hopefully, Dr. Orly Taitz will see this article and forward it to Lt Col. Earl-Graef.