Obamas arrested

Obamas arrested
Pray for the day!

Senate Refused to Vet Obama

We're Never Gonna Stand For This

Freedom of Speech Will No Longer Be Possible

The original Kenyan birth certificate of Obama

Dog Day Afternoon

Is it here, yet?

This is an American Tradition That Has Always Been Valuable to Us

To Arrest Obama or Force America to Live Enslaved?

Obama is a Muslim

Restore America

There's a Communist Living in the white House

Dr. Taitz on Obama

The Enemy is Obama

How to Become an Underground Publisher and help take back America


There you will find directions and suggested material and web sites to check to find other material. You are welcome to take material from this site, the info service site, or just find your own. Whatever please commit to spread the word.

Join us at http://blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots every Monday 3:30 p.m. pactific standard time


Lakin Defense Options !!!


The Stand Up America BlogSTAND UP AMERICA EXCLUSIVE – Lakin Defense OptionsPublished on 09/03/10

Editor’s Note: The following report is solely the product of the authors and is posted here for the public to view, and discern for themselves. It is a scholarly work and may clear up many questions readers may have.

Courts Martial Defense For LTC Terrence LakinBy J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington

World Net Daily, which has been following the Lakin trial step-by-step from the beginning, is reporting:

FT. MEADE, Md. – A career officer in the U.S. Army [Col. Denise R. Lind] acting as a judge in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin today ruled that the military is no place for Barak Obama’s presidential eligibility to be evaluated.
According to the WND report, presiding authority Col. Denise R. Lind used the following arguments to deny LTC Lakin proper access to a defense, summarized in the following three paragraphs taken from the 40 minute long reading of her decision Army Col. Denise R. Lind today ruled in a hearing regarding the evidence to be allowed in the scheduled October court-martial of Lakin that he will be denied access to any of Obama’s records as well as any testimony from those who may have access to the records.

With her decision, Lind mirrored a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs’ access to any requested documentation regarding the president’s eligibility.
Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.

We find foundational flaws in Col. Lind’s decision, which Lakin’s defense team must seize upon in order to alter the current course of this trial.

1 – Lind’s authority is derived from the same place as LTC Lakin’s and all other members of the United States Military – from the supreme command of the office of Commander-in-Chief, the President of the United States.

2 – Lind is attempting to use her authority under her Commander-in-Chief to break the military chain of command, isolating the Commander-in-Chief of the US Military specifically, exempting the President from his position of authority in the chain of command, without which, Lind herself has no authority to convene the Courts Martial.

3 – Lind then reaches outside of the US Military Justice system to the Civil Court, relying upon civil court precedent to deny Lakin any access to discovery and thereby, a proper defense guaranteed him by the US Constitution and UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice. Civil Court precedent has no legal standing in a UCMJ criminal proceeding. In fact, the UCMJ is based upon the Articles of War (aka War Articles) and is a “penal system” unlike the US Justice System – as explained by Col. William Winthrop in Military Law and Precedents. As a result, precedents set in courts outside of the UCMJ are without legal standing in any UCMJ proceeding.

4 – Not even in the UCMJ can the United States government deny the accused his/her right to a trial, complete with discovery of related evidence. Yet Lind attempts to do so, under the authority derived from her Commander-in-Chief. If the chain of command is broken, then Lind herself has no authority.

5 – Lind’s statement that the legality of the Commander-in-Chief is “not relevant” in matters of military command is false on its face. As stated in a sworn affidavit filed by LTG Thomas G. McInerney executed on August 20, 2010 – “In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. – By thus stepping up to the bar, LTC Lakin is demonstrating the courage of his convictions and his bravery. – That said, it is equally essential that he be allowed access to the evidence that will prove whether he made the correct decision.”

6 – Lind attempts to break the chain of command at The Pentagon level, which she claims has no issue with the current Commander-in-Chief and that this should be good enough for Lakin. Yet she cannot break this chain of command without eliminating her own authority, and Lakin’s oath requires that he decide for himself whether or not his orders are legal, as affirmed in LTG McInerney’s sworn affidavit.

7 – At issue is not whether or not LTC Lakin refused orders, but rather whether or not he “unlawfully” refused orders. If his orders were not “lawful,” including but not limited to, emanating from a “lawful” chain of command which begins with a lawful Commander-in-Chief, then Lakin must be found NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.
At the heart of the matter is whether or not his orders to deploy were “lawful.” LTC Lakin has questioned whether or not his deployment orders were “lawful” on the basis that he believes that the Commander-in-Chief from which those orders are issued, may not be “lawful,” therefore making any orders from the top of military command “unlawful.”
To determine whether or not Lakin is correct in his decision to refuse orders, it is paramount to discover with certainty whether or not his orders were issued by a “lawful” command.
As we know, Article II – Section I requires that only a “natural born citizen” of the United States can hold the office of President, Commander-in-Chief. In this regard, a fatal misstep in the Lakin defense has opened the door for the illegitimate statements now being made by Col. Denise R. Lind.

LTC Lakin failed to directly assert that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT legal in his command on the basis that we know with certainty that he is not a “natural born citizen,” – and that LTC Lakin is “lawfully” refusing to follow orders on this basis. Instead, LTC Lakin only asked the “birth place” question and tied that question to whether or not Mr. Obama could and would present an official “birth certificate” proving once and for all that he was indeed born in Hawaii, making the wrong assumption that if he could and would provide proof of said birth via an official birth certificate, which has never been released to date.

The fatal error revolves around the reality that Obama’s birth place is of no consequence in the matter of his status as a “natural born citizen” eligible for high Command of the US Military under Article II – Section I of the Constitution. Although there is no shortage of opinions on the subject of what the term “natural born citizen” means, there is no honest debate on the matter either.

Every Supreme Court Justice knows exactly what the term “natural born citizen” means, where it came from, why it exists in Article II requirements for the office of President and that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a “natural born citizen,” indeed ineligible for the office he currently holds.

They know that LTC Lakin is right to “lawfully” refuse orders from an illegal Command.

We know this on the basis of the following critical facts:

1 – The term “natural born citizen” is derived from the Law of Nations. An international treaty establishing a set of rules used to establish a “nation,” the issue of nation and citizen sovereignty, and internationally recognized definitions of universal terms, including the term “natural born citizen.”

2 – The Law of Nations is specifically mentioned in the US Constitution as an enumerated power of Congress under Article I – Section VIII – Item X – “To define and punish offenses against the Law of Nations;” (Note that in the original Constitution, Law of Nations is capitalized, referring specifically to THE Law of Nations.)

3 – From Emerich de Vattel’s 1758 book on The Law of Nations, Chapter 19 § 212. – Of the citizens and natives – Vattel establishes – “in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

4 – In a letter from Founder John Jay to then President of the Constitutional Convention George Washington, Jay stated – “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

5 – It was later learned that President George Washington had actually taken out Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations from the local library in order to study proper implementation of law in our newly formed nation, and never returned that book. On the basis of known history and facts behind the Constitutional term “natural born citizen” which is based upon “natural law” explained in the Law of Nations as stated referred to in the US Constitution, the proper assertion is not at all related to the actual “birth place” of Barack Hussein Obama, II. The ongoing search for a Hawaiian birth certificate has no bearing on the subject of “natural born citizen” status for Barack Hussein Obama, II.

The only relative question is:

Was Barack Hussein Obama’s birth father a legal citizen of the United States of America at the time of his birth, no matter where in the world he may have been born? Without a birth father who was a legal citizen of the United States at the time of his birth, Barack Hussein Obama, II cannot be a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, he is not without divided national loyalties, and cannot serve as President of the United States or Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military as a result, creating a national security and a full blown Constitutional crisis.

According to the two autobiographical books by Barack Hussein Obama, II – his birth father is Barack Hussein Obama, a British subject at the time and a legal citizen of Kenya. According to public family history, Barack Hussein Obama was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States.

On this basis alone, LTC Lakin is right (and lawful) in refusing to accept orders from an illegal command. The US Constitution and the Law of Nations, upon which our sovereign nation was formed, are very clear on the matter.

As a result, the need for LTC Lakin to gain access to the Hawaiian birth records for Barack Hussein Obama, II is eliminated.

LTC Lakin need only assert the following:

On the basis of Article II – Section I of the US Constitution, supported by Article I – Section VIII – Item X concerning the Law of Nations and the term “natural born citizen,” – I hereby refuse any and all illegal orders issued by the illegal Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military, President Barack Hussein Obama, on the basis that he does not meet Constitutional requirements for the office he currently holds and must further hereby demand that he be removed from office and immediately relieved of Command of the United States Military. I further assert that due to the illegal status of existing Military high Command that this Court Martial has no authority under which to proceed.

Under this assertion, there is no need for access to the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama, II, unless Mr. Obama chooses to respond by stating that Barack Hussein Obama is not his real birth father, in which case Mr. Obama is admitting to fraud during his pursuit of the Oval Office.
In the event that the UCMJ chooses to challenge the historically accurate definition of the term “natural born citizen” described herein, the US Supreme Court is the only court in the land with proper authority to rule on the true meaning of the term “natural born citizen” – as stated by the Constitutional protections that LTC Lakin has sworn a lifetime to protect and defend.

With this assertion is place, LTC Lakin does not have to prove that his assertions are true and accurate. As Commander-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama must prove that Lakin’s assertion is false in order to proceed with the government prosecution of LTC Lakin on the grounds that he has “unlawfully” refused orders.

In short, Mr. Obama must prove that his orders are in fact “lawful.” If Obama is either unable or unwilling to do so, then LTC Lakin is in fact NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.

This particular case is not about one soldier refusing deployment orders. It is about a nation allowing a precedent to stand which makes it possible for any individual with any foreign allegiance to hold the highest office in this land, with no obligation whatsoever to demonstrate or prove national loyalties before holding the office of President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.

This case is about whether or not the US Constitution stands as the official Law of this land.

NOTE: Past challenges on the term “natural born citizen” have been improperly argued upon cases revolving around the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment relates to “immigration” and “naturalization” laws, not “natural law” used to establish “natural born citizenship” status of an individual. Therefore, any and all cases pertaining to Fourteenth Amendment arguments are moot on the matter of “natural born citizen” claims.

Researched and Prepared By:
J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington
The United States Patriots Union, LLC - Sheridan, Wyoming
Available pdf - Courts Martial Defense of LTC Terrance Lakin.pdf (399kb - 5 pgs)

Researched and Reviewed By:
The United States Bar Association


Rise Up ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwvuimX2bjIStand Up ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Het3H9iQIAir America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dnq8o_7hPccI Am America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2CzerawWho We Are - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHtVxDz43KY Come to Jesus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs10Rr14WxYWe The People - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJEAmerica Rising - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=662R2awSwPQI Fought For You - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTb6qdPu8JEChicago Tea Party - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8kChildren of Liberty - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWnrt0ZLKQIU.S. Cease to Exist - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6p3l8BXmhsGod Save Arizona ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrA07jcIHZIGod Bless Arizona ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKFuYykPSxIAwaken O, America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fzKY0hS_PwRun Into The Conflict - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6lWl_XzKAMuslim Demographics - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYUThree Things About Islam - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6wU.S. has 2 Constitutions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0These are the Oath Keepers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf2K4-BQYAIStop The Socialist Revolution ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtjQzpfq9-UThe Hidden Covenant Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnO-x9hkpX4The Hidden Covenant Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI92qto8gYsOB Mocks, Attacks Jesus, Bible - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi-V_ilJu0wObama Admits He Is A Muslim - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzYSecond American Revolution - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDkWeThePeople Stimulus Package - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyAThe Year of Living Dangerously - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsBOxDM_VekGOD'S JUDGMENT ON AMERICA - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW6roFN7NAENWO Plans 3 World Wars from 1871 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0DIQgnNRY49/11 NWO - Eu USA vs Russia China - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhvfCFCfdNkToo Late to Apologize: A Declaration - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZfRaWAtBVgOur Lives, Fortunes, Sacred Honor 2010 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL5bPJFHRnA

Esoteric Agenda - http://blip.tv/search?q=esoteric+agendaCamp FEMA: American Lockdown (1:26:41) - http://blip.tv/file/3661748Don't Tread On Me: Rise of the Republic (1:35:45) - http://blip.tv/file/3644422/Meltup - InflationUS (54:37) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1n1X0OqdwFall of the Republic HQ (2:24:18) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shUThe Obama Deception HQ (1:53:40) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLwLOOSE CHANGE ! Full Version HD - 9/11 Absolute Truth - http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cnhf29Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA HQ (2:20:38) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klqv9t1zVwwInvisible Empire - NWO Defined HQ (2:14:01) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5ENorman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations (52:24) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHMAmerica: Freedom to Fascism (1:51:16) - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173The Fourth Kind Encounters (1:38) - http://sureynot.com/v/1278/the-fourth-kind,-true-story-with-raw-footage.html

Shadow Government - Grant Jeffrey (4 parts)Pt 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td01pNoC8icPt 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8UlFZZwG3EPt 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsHXb74M3JkPt 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Du7SiYLa90

The United American Freedom Foundation - http://uaff.info/2010 Sex, Drugs & Religion (1:11:14) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1021806902010 Global Eugenics - Using Medicine To Kill (2:04:57) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1007205722010 The American Matrix - Age Of Deception (2:00:03) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1007198422008 The Decline And Fall Of America - The Movie (2:00:46) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=63997187

Twenty Ten - 2010 by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZkvkLmkYVgNBRA Feet to the Fire by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s8BGPy7_MULloyd Marcus - American Tea Party Anthem - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1byTDgu7iAWE THE PEOPLE, New Tea Party Unity Song by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlkgFpU_FB4Confessions of a Black Conservative - http://www.lloydmarcus.com/?page_id=1029Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/user/LloydMarcusUSAhttp://www.lloydmarcus.com

Victory over All Creationhttp://downloads.cbn.com/cbnplayer/cbnPlayer.swf?s=/vod/MW131v2_WS

Run Into The Conflict - "Run For Your Life" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6lWl_XzKA On the first Sunday following the tragedy of September 11th, 2001, Carter Conlon delivered this soul-stirring message at Times Square Church in Manhattan. The sermon was titled, "Run For Your Life" and it is certainly worth the effort to listen to it in its entirety. http://www.braveheartedgospel.com/Sermons.html

U.S. HISTORY REPETITIVE TO END TIMEI - Bondage to Spiritual Faith - Year of The MayflowerII - From Spiritual Faith to great Courage - 1776III - From Courage to Liberty - Constitution 1791IV - From Liberty to Abundance - 1900 to 1960V - From Abundance to Complacency - 1960 to 1980VI - From Complacency to Apathy - 1980 to 2000VII - From Apathy to Dependence - 2000 to 2009 VIII - From Dependence back into Bondage by CONTRIVANCEIX - From Bondage to Spiritual Faith - 2010 to ? by REVIVAL or DEMISE - WWIIIX - RAPTURE - Blessed Assurance has Come - NEW JERUSALEM

Antichrist Illuminati Obama New World Order Agenda 2012 Exposedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjCiz47_PTY

The Prophecies and Revelations of Saint Bridget (Birgitta) of Swedenhttp://www.saintbirgitta.com/

Yahuwah - Yahushuahttp://followersofyah.com/

Listen to the discussion--lessons learned in 2009--1/18/2010

The facts about the health care bill!

We're The Government and You're Not

Stand up for America

keep the fire burning

keep the fire burning
Keeping alive the burning desire for freedom

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

judicata-stated on www.telegraph.co.uk on 12/30/09

Barack Hussein Obama II is an unmitigated failure. Europe should not expect anything great from this loser, and certainly do not expect him to protect you, let alone America. He is only into protecting himself and his distorted image of what he thinks he is.

I don’t want the British public to think Americans are happy with Barack Hussein Obama II, they are not. Anyone not in the ObamaCamp are the so-called minority, targeted, and all in a position where its been impossible challenging any illegalities in his system, but most especially the illegal votes that were cast in favor of him. No one’s talking about THAT.

Nearly all websites that do not glorify this newly anointed Messiah have had attempted hack jobs, and all share the ObamaBlogBots using up posting space to neutralize the bad press against Obama. These BlogBots are on “someone’s” payroll, and there are thousands of them enlisted to disrupt and sling $#@!!. Their 24hr job is to just troll the internet and diffuse bad press against Obama and to stop the truth from spreading.

This last terror attack by the Crotch Bomber was met with the typical “let them eat cake” attitude of this narcissistic president; he went on with his golf game and chowing down on his prime rib–courtesy of the US Taxpayer. Needless to say he takes his entire extended family with him on Air Force One whenever he goes on a “vacation” which is often. Hard to stomach when so many of us have lost our jobs and homes and cannot feed our families. This guy doesn’t give a damn. We have block after block in state after state that are empty shops. People are not spending money, they are afraid. We have tourist towns that now look like ghost towns.

This autocrat in the White House is ill-equipped to deal with life in general, but more to the point, he has denigrated the office of the President by appointing his personal yahoos as yes men. He is subjected the US and the world to further attacks. He takes nothing seriously except to put the onus back on the American people.

The world needs to know, that many of us in the US are now hostage to this new-order regime, one where we cannot speak out as we want and are subject to ridicule and retaliation if and when we do complain. ALL complainers are termed “racists.” This newly minted Obama-mentality has trickled down into every government department including our state offices and state police forces. If you want to know what’s really going on in America, seek out Police Blogs for many states, for instance, California and you will see how corrupt it is. Start at http://www.ratemycop.com and then search for more. It was not this way before Obama got elected.

Barack Hussein Obama II has broken every promise he used to get elected. He IS a liar. And it is now clear that he had no intention of fulfilling those promises and had no intention of doing what is in the best interests of America, let alone the rest of the world.

judicata on Dec 30th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
Report comment

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Yes We Can!

It is going to be an action year this 2010.


Look what the American Grand Jury is doing now! Dr. Taitz will be appearing before Judge Lamberth this January 25, 2010. Let’s all support this in any and all ways we can!

The Honorable Royce C. Lamberth
Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Columbia

Re: Grand Jury Presentments
Defendants: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi
Docket Number: Misc. No. 09-346 (RCL)

Judge Lamberth,

The sin of the people is to lose faith in their Constitution. The sin of our Judiciary is to procrastinate while enforcing the Constitution.

American Grand Jury

Judge Lamberth, apparently procrastination is now in full force and effect in your Court. Your Honor, the question is, how serious does a Constitutional crisis have to become before the Judiciary will act? Is the workload of the Judiciary so overwhelming that the Constitution has to wait in line to receive recognition or service?

Barack Obama has committed serious crimes against our Nation. The evidence is well documented and published. Barack Obama has admitted in public and his writings that his father was not a US citizen. Clearly, Obama can never qualify as a “natural born” citizen. The Constitution states that only a “natural born” citizen shall be eligible for the Office of the Presidency. It is so simple, a 10 year old child can grasp the truth. Yet power and corruption would seek to quash and deny the truth to the People of the United States. Does the Justice system in this country think that most citizens are so ignorant that they cannot understand a simple clause in the Constitution?

Your Honor, we would imagine these statements are not what you wanted to hear. Matter of fact, we understand that our statments probably make you angry or make you want to reprimand those that challenge your Court or authority. Well, your Honor, get in line. Many are now challenging your intentions. It is now estimated that 60% of Americans want to know the truth about Barack Obama. He has spent close to 2.0 million dollars fighting something like 15 civil lawsuits to hide the truth about his citizenship. Each time a Judge says this is a “jurisdictional” issue or a “standing” issue the People want to throw up. The day the Constitution or the People no longer have jurisdiction or standing in this Country is the day the Judiciary can no longer be trusted to defend or administrate the laws of our land.

Time is no longer a luxury the Judiciary has to waste. Before the Court is a 21-page document that charges Barack Obama with “Eligibility Fraud and Treason.” It further charges Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi with “Conspiracy of Election Fraud.” They are extremely serious criminal charges. These charges can and must be heard in a court of law. If Obama can produce a valid Birth Certificate proving that he was born in the United States, and further prove his birth mother and father were citizens of the United States, then the man’s name will be exonerated and the case closed forever. But this proof has never been offered and the people have the right to know. Obama no longer has the right to conceal the truth, not when it concerns a blatant criminal violation of the Constitution. The charges have been levied against the man. The question is, what is this Court going to do about it?

Judge Lamberth, we fight evil by exposing it. Once the truth is known, evil has no power over you or your Court. The People of this country are a lot stronger than the government would lead us to believe. The talk that our Country could never survive an election scandal is simply an excuse. The truth of the matter is this Country cannot survive an attack on the Constitution by a public criminal when the Judiciary fails to do anything about it.

American Grand Jury and its members have gone to great lengths to study the evidence and hand down our Presentments. We have served your Court with these Presentments and responded to your Orders. “Time is of the essence.” It is now time to act. Talk is cheap and words become meaningless if Judges such as yourself are in a position to act but fail to do so.

Judge Lamberth, we wish you a Happy New Year. We know the decisions before you are not easy. Nothing in life is easy. Our Country was founded on courage, conviction and action. May the Lord guide you in your decisions, may He bless you with strength and courage.


American Grand Jury

American Grand Jury Presentments
Judge Lamberth Orders One and Two
American Grand Jury Motion to Reconsider
American Grand Jury Response to Order

Petition names submitted by ____ United States citizens

Yes We Can remove the usurper from office in 2010!

Monday, December 28, 2009

Call them enablers and ridicule them!

2010 will be the year we patriots are going to turn the tables on all those who attempted to ridicule us for assuming our constitutional duty by demanding Barry Sotoero prove he meets the qualifications to be president according to article 2 in the Constitution.

We shall point out that any one who does not consider the national security of America, the economic well being of Americans, and the protection and defense of the constitution a major patriotic priority is an enabler, aider and abettor of a fraudulent government and the usurpation of the presidency. They are also coconspirators in their own undesired destinies!

Thursday, December 24, 2009


British Law declares Obama a British citizen !!!
Legal Analysis by John Charlton

The Union Jack, symbol of British tyranny and oppresion to the American revolutionaries, has flown over the head of Barack Obama from his birth.

(Dec. 24, 2009) — Barack Hussein Obama has written 2 biographies about himself and has publicly spoken of his origins in many public speeches. He claims as his biological and legal father, a man who went by the name Barrack Hussein Obama. That is the more common Kenyan spelling of the name. His claimed father also went by the names “Barak” and “Barack”, the former when he penned an article in an journal on economics, in Nairobi, in the 60’s, the latter when he registered at the University of Hawaii. The latter form appears on the electronic image of Obama’s alleged Certification of Live Birth.

If we apply the provisions of British and Kenyan law to the simple facts, which Obama claims about himself — though in truth there is not documentation that the public has seen to confirm the truth of these facts — the inescapable conclusion is that Obama was born a British subject and is now, still to this day, a British citizen.

The laws and regulations which lead to this conclusion are the official British Consular Registry Stipulations, the British Nationality Act of 1948 and of 1981, Kenya Constitution, and the Kenya Independence Act of 1963.

Let’s see how these apply to Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that he’d be born a ‘British Citizen by Descent’

The British Consular Registry uses the criteria set forth in the British Nationality Act of 1948 Section 5(1) of the United Kingdom and Colonies to determine who would be qualified as a “British Citizen By Descent.”

Section 5-1 reads thus:

5.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth:

Provided that if the father of such a person is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent only, that person shall not be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by virtue of this section unless—

(a) that person is born or his father was born in a protectorate, protected state, mandated territory or trust territory or any place in a foreign country where by treaty, capitulation, grant, usage, sufferance, or other lawful means, His Majesty then has or had jurisdiction over British subjects; or

(b) that person’s birth having occurred in a place in a foreign country other than a place such as is mentioned in the last foregoing paragraph, the birth is registered at a United Kingdom consulate within one year of its occurrence, or, with the permission of the Secretary of State, later; or

(c) that person’s father is, at the time of the birth, in Crown service under His Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom; or

(d) that person is born in any country mentioned in subsection (3) of section one of this Act in which a citizenship law has then taken effect and does not become a citizen thereof on birth.

The man Obama claims as his father is Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., a man born in the Kenya Colony in 1936. Being born in the Kenya Colony, he was a British subject or citizen. Obama was born after the commencement of this above quoted act, ergo, Obama Jr. is a British citizen-by-descent.

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that he’d become a Citizen of Kenya in 1963
According to the Kenya Constitution (87), Obama became a Kenyan citizen in 1963, by virtue of the fact that his claimed father was born in the Kenya colony.

The Constitution of Kenya, Section 87, reads thus:

87*. Persons who became citizens on 12th December, 1963
Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on llth December, 1963, as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person, shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963:Provided that a person shall not become a citizen of Kenya by virtue of this subsection if neither of his parents was born in Kenya.
Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on llth December, 1963, as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person, shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.
Therefore Obama Jr. became a citizen of Kenya, Dec. 12, 1963, when his father did. Moreover, when his father returned to Kenya, upon graduation from Harvard, he obtained employment with the Kenyan Government as a senior Economist.

Note, that while the Kenyan constitution prohibits dual citizenship for those 21 years old or older, it does not do so for minors (cf. section 97 of the Kenyan Constitution).

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that he’d remain a British citizen-by-descent after 1963
According to the Kenya Independence Act of 1963, Obama would have retained his British citizenship status.

This is the legal conclusion of the provisions of Chapter 54, section 3 of that act of Parliament:

3.—(1) Any reference in subsection (2) or subsection (3) of this section to a colony, protectorate or protected state shall, subject to subsection (7) of this section, be construed as a reference to a territory which is a colony, protectorate or protected state (within the meaning of the British Nationality Act 1948) on the appointed day, and, accordingly, shall not include a reference to Kenya or any part thereof.

(2) Subject to subsection (6) of this section, a person shall not cease to be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies under section 2(2) of this Act if he, his father or his father’s father —

(a) was born in the United Kingdom or in a colony; or

(b) is or was a person naturalised in the United Kingdom and Colonies; or

(c) was registered as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies; or

(d) became a British subject by reason of the annexation of any territory included in a colony.

(3) A person shall not cease to be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies under section 2(2) of this Act if he was born in a protectorate or protected state, or if his father or his father’s father was so born and is or at any time was a British subject.

(4) A woman who is the wife of a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies shall not cease to be such a citizen under section 2(2) of this Act unless her husband does so.…

Since Obama’s claimed father was born in Kenya Colony, which was in 1936 part of the British Empire, and furthermore, since his father’s father, Hussein Onyango Obama was born in the British Protectorate of Kenya in 1895 (cfr. Dreams of My Father, p. 376; 425-426) , and was therefore a British Protected Person under the British Nationality and Status Act of 1914, Obama Jr retained his British citizenship status after Dec. 12, 1963.

Obama’s alleged childhood history raises the question that he was adopted by an Indonesian citizen, and therefore became an Indonesian citizen in 1966-67
According to the laws of Indonesia, in force in the 1960’s, Obama would have become a citizen of Indonesia if he was adopted by Lolo Soetero at the age of 5 or younger.

It is not yet known whether he was adopted, of if he was, in what year this may have occurred. Facts to support such an adoption are thus: an Indonesian school record which indicates that he was an Indonesian citizen, bearing the name Barry Soetero, and the Dunham-Soetero Divorce Decree of 1981, which indicates a non-minor as a child of the marriage.

That Obama goes by the name “Barry” was evidenced recently, when he called into a radio show and spoke with the outgoing Governor of Virginia. On that occasion he identified himself as “Barry from D.C..” When questioned about this phone call, the White House said that it “would not be inaccurate” to say the person calling was Barack Hussein Obama, Jr..

The Presumption is that Obama did not revoke his British Citizenship on Aug. 4, 1979
According to the British Home Office: U.K. Border Agency, to renounce British Citizenship one must be at least 18 years of age and fill out a declaration, using form RN.

Therefore, upon reaching the age of 18, on Aug. 4, 1979, Obama could have revoked his citizenship. However, the British Government has never affirmed that he has. Therefore in law we must presume that he has not, if his birth story is true.

There is ground to suppose Obama renewed his Kenyan Citizenship in 1982
The Kenyan constitution establishes that upon reaching the age of 21 years, a Kenyan citizen must renounce all other citizenships, if he wants to retain his Kenyan citizenship. There is a 2 year window in which he must make such a renunciation. In Obama’s case this window opened on Aug. 4, 1982, and closed on Aug. 4, 1984. It is known that Obama visited Kenya 2 years after his father’s death (which occurred in 1981), and thus in 1983, during this window of opportunity.

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that in 1983, he’d become a British-overseas-citizen and remain such today

Obama acknowledges his British citizenship, by bowing to his Queen, Elizabeth II.

The British Nationality Act of 1981 changed the nomenclature for citizenship status.

The pertinent provision of that act is found in Chapter 61, Part III, and reads as follows:


s 26 Citizens of U.K. and Colonies who are to become British Overseas citizens at commencement.

Any person who was a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies immediately before commencement and who does not at commencement become either a British citizen or a [British overseas territories citizen] [FN1] shall at commencement become a British Overseas citizen.

By “commencement”, the Act signifies Jan. 1, 1983, the date upon which it went into force.

Hence according to this Act, Obama Jr. would have gone from being classified a British citizen-by-descent, to a British Overseas Citizen.

In summary, Obama was born a British citizen-by-descent, and remains a British Overseas Citizen even today — if his birth story is true. He was also a citizen of Kenya prior to age 21, and may still be one. He seems also to have been a citizen of Indonesia from 1966-1980’s, but this is uncertain.

Editor's note:

There was another article at The Post & Email with a similar title and subject, but which I was asked to pull by its author, since the author feared being attacked by Obama supporters. I owe all the research to this author, but this article is entirely my own creation, inasmuch as I have not cited the author in anything, and wrote all the above myself, excluding the cited laws.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009


Illegal Congress - Redress

Don't Let Unconstitutional Legislation Be Shoved Down Your Throat ...

Thanks J.C at

Was the Vote on Healthcare By Congressional Democrats Constitutional? I think not!

Senators don't have the legal right to vote YES on Obamacare because its unconstitutional- see hard evidence in my constructive notice, below. I just served this on both my Senators from The State of CA, by certified mail, to have standing to petition them for redress of grievances if they ignore said petition. You can easily do the same by going to your state constitute, copying and pasting Article I and serve it to your senators.

These people have recently demonstrated without a doubt their cluelessness and it's well past time to bring them up to speed on the Constitution in their state. So what's it going to be roll over and suck your thumb and hope this magically goes away or stand up for your rights and put your Senators under notice that they have violated their oath to defend and protect the Constitution of their state and that of the U.S.A. Random thoughts while observing the passing parade, J.C.





SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.


SEC. 2. (a) Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or
her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of
this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or
(b) A publisher, editor, reporter, or other person connected with
or employed upon a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical
publication, or by a press association or wire service, or any person
who has been so connected or employed, shall not be adjudged in
contempt by a judicial, legislative, or administrative body, or any
other body having the power to issue subpoenas, for refusing to
disclose the source of any information procured while so connected or
employed for publication in a newspaper, magazine or other
periodical publication, or for refusing to disclose any unpublished
information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving or
processing of information for communication to the public.
Nor shall a radio or television news reporter or other person
connected with or employed by a radio or television station, or any
person who has been so connected or employed, be so adjudged in
contempt for refusing to disclose the source of any information
procured while so connected or employed for news or news commentary
purposes on radio or television, or for refusing to disclose any
unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving
or processing of information for communication to the public.
As used in this subdivision, "unpublished information" includes
information not disseminated to the public by the person from whom
disclosure is sought, whether or not related information has been
disseminated and includes, but is not limited to, all notes,
outtakes, photographs, tapes or other data of whatever sort not
itself disseminated to the public through a medium of communication,
whether or not published information based upon or related to such
material has been disseminated.


SEC. 3. (a) The people have the right to instruct their
representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and
assemble freely to consult for the common good.
(b) (1) The people have the right of access to information
concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the
meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and
agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.
(2) A statute, court rule, or other authority, including those in
effect on the effective date of this subdivision, shall be broadly
construed if it furthers the people's right of access, and narrowly
construed if it limits the right of access. A statute, court rule,
or other authority adopted after the effective date of this
subdivision that limits the right of access shall be adopted with
findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and
the need for protecting that interest.
(3) Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies the right
of privacy guaranteed by Section 1 or affects the construction of any
statute, court rule, or other authority to the extent that it
protects that right to privacy, including any statutory procedures
governing discovery or disclosure of information concerning the
official performance or professional qualifications of a peace
(4) Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies any
provision of this Constitution, including the guarantees that a
person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due
process of law, or denied equal protection of the laws, as provided
in Section 7.
(5) This subdivision does not repeal or nullify, expressly or by
implication, any constitutional or statutory exception to the right
of access to public records or meetings of public bodies that is in
effect on the effective date of this subdivision, including, but not
limited to, any statute protecting the confidentiality of law
enforcement and prosecution records.
(6) Nothing in this subdivision repeals, nullifies, supersedes, or
modifies protections for the confidentiality of proceedings and
records of the Legislature, the Members of the Legislature, and its
employees, committees, and caucuses provided by Section 7 of Article
IV, state law, or legislative rules adopted in furtherance of those
provisions; nor does it affect the scope of permitted discovery in
judicial or administrative proceedings regarding deliberations of the
Legislature, the Members of the Legislature, and its employees,
committees, and caucuses.

TO: Senators Boxer and Feinstein

Via: Registered Letter

Dear Senators:

You have just met to vote on your parties Illegal and Unconstitutional Health Care Reform Act on Monday at 1 am.

I am putting you on CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF INSTRUCTION that you do not have any LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL authority to vote yes on this issue. Therefore, your vote will be in VIOLATION of your OATH OF OFFICE and subject to removal.

Congress lacks the constitutional authority to regulate and control the practice of medicine in the jurisdiction of the States.

See Linder v. United States (caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...), 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S.Ct. 446 (1925) ("Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government");

Lambert v. Yellowly (caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...), 272 U.S. 581, 589, 47 S.Ct. 210 (1926) ("It is important also to bear in mind that 'direct control of medical practice in the States is beyond the power of the Federal Government.' Linder v. United States 268 U.S. 5, 18. Congress, therefore, cannot directly restrict the professional judgment of the physician or interfere with its free exercise in the treatment of disease. Whatever power exists in that respect belongs to the states exclusively.")

Oregon v. Ashcroff (openjurist.org...), 368 F.3d 1118, 1124 (9th Cir. 2004) ("The principle that state governments bear the primary responsibility for evaluating physician assisted suicide follows from our concept of federalism, which requires that state lawmakers, not the federal government, are 'the primary regulators of professional [medical] conduct.' Conant v. Walters, 309 F.3d 629, 639 (9th Cir. 2002);

Barsky v. Bd. of Regents (supreme.justia.com...), 347 U.S. 442, 449, 74 S.Ct 650, 98 L.ED. 829 (1954) ('It is elemental that a state has broad power to establish and enforce standards of conduct within its broders relative to the health of everyone there. It is a vital part of a state's police power.') The Attorney General 'may not...regulate [the doctor-patient] relationship to advance federal policy.' Conant, 309 F3d at 647 (Kozinski, J., concurring).")

And certain features of this proposed law will certainly be unconstitutional; see:

United States v. Constantine (supreme.justia.com...), 296, U.S. 287, 56 S.Ct. 223 (1935) "We think the suggestion has never been made -- certainly never entertained by this Court -- that the United States may impose cumulativepenalties above and beyond those specified by state law for infractions of the state's criminal code by its own citizens. The affirmative of such a proposition would obliterate the distinction between the delegated powers of the federal government and those reserved to the states and to their citizens. The implications from a decision sustaining such an imposition would be startling. The concession of such a power would open the door to unlimited regulation of matters of state concern by federal authority. The regulation of the conduct of its own citizens belongs to the state, not to the United States. The right to impose sanctions for violations of the state's laws inheres in the body of its citizens speaking through their representatives. So far as the reservations of the Tenth Amendment were qualified by the adoption of the Eighteenth, the qualification has been abolished. (emphases added)


Article. IV.

Section. 3.

Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, President International Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA www.iahf.com... jham@iahf.com 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World

Saturday, December 19, 2009

America No LOnger A Republic

Moral Turpitude

Is there no decency among any of them? What they call a health bill is NOT A HEALTH BILL. The proper name for this heinous document is THE RIGHT TO KILL AMERICANS IN THE NEW AMERICAN DICTATORSHIP DOCUMENT!

Once again America is witnessing the silver plating of the foulest crimes against humanity born out of a cesspool of bribes, threats, intimidation, lies, lawlessness and violation of America’s contract between government and we the people—THE CONSTITUTION. These amoral kings and queens of SOPHISTRY are calling this a victory for the good of American people when the hard reality is it is an act total destruction to the morals and principles that made America great. They are telling America this is for the protection of American health when in reality it is giving them the power (not legally) to murder us in many, many ways—starting with late term abortions, rationed medical treatment to the elderly, to assisting the elderly in suicide.

When Pelosi answered the reporter who asked her where in the Constitution does it permit the forcing of a government health care plan upon the American people and she confronted the man in an arrogant tone of voice by saying twice:

“Are you serious? -------Are you serious?”

She simply mirrored the entire attitude of the existing government. They simply make up the laws as they go totally ignoring our sacred Constitution.
Our very breath and lives are now threatened. We no longer have the protection of the Constitution. They have shredded it and replaced it with unscrupulous and capricious tyranny. No longer does the finest within humanity lead the world. We are governed by the most depraved, vicious, dysfunctional and genocidal thugs that have crawled out of the sewers and under rocks the history of the world has ever seen.

This is the real reason Janet Napolitano was asked to create her Homeland Security Report. They have anticipated eventually Americans will rebel against what they are forcing upon us. With the Homeland security report, the government has created a system to legalize invading our homes without search warrants, removing any one it chooses based upon being a threat to the government, stop us in our vehicles or shoot us down in the streets if we protest to loud.

The government is still funding money to Acorn. Eric Holder still refuses to prosecute the Black Panthers who were practicing voter intimidation. The silence about Nidal Maliq Hassan’s Muslim terrorist attack on Foot Hood is so loud it is terrifying. The insistence upon bringing the 5 terrorist to New York for trial in spite of valid objections and millions of protest is appalling. The millions of pink slips America sent Washington, the repeated protests by the Tea Party people, the millions of calls and faxes sent to Washington have been totally ignored by our elected officials.

Does all this not show a pattern and a direction where this government is going? They are not listening to us. They have their own agenda. They are ignoring the Constitution which was designed to protect us from the crimes government is now committing against us. They are putting policies and laws into place for then sole purpose of total control or kill us if we revolt. They are working towards dictatorship!

We the people are now on our own without a judicial system of integrity, without a Constitution that is honored, without weapons to defend ourselves, with no sanctuary to hide any where on the planet, and soon to be looted of the last of our security, property, and valuables. We are now in a lawless land. Whatever we believed to be so in our law is no longer so. This is the true reason Barry and Evita so desperately need to get this anti humanity health care bill passed.

These are very, very dangerous times. We must take steps to protect ourselves and family. All that is left for us to do is to go under ground and develop a net work of like minded people who can be trusted if we are to survive the next decade. I because of my age will not be one of the survivors. Those who can start preparing now! We the people are crime victims of our own government.

Friday, December 18, 2009

President Obama Scares Lou Pritchet

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America ’s true living legends- an
acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world’s highest
rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize
him as the foremost leader in change management. Lou changed the way
America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to
be known as “partnering.” Pritchett rose from soap salesman to
Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and
Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.


Dear President Obama:
You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike
any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive
Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no
visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth
growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.
You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.
You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus
don’t understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned
yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to
publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail..
You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America ‘
crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style
country where the government sector dominates instead of the
private sector.

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system
with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly
capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.
You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose
that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of
living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics
against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from
challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.
You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider
opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both
omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything
you do.

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the
Limbaugh’s, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing,
conservative points of view.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.
Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will
probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

Lou Pritchett

TRUE – CHECK: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp
< http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp>
This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it.
Big surprise. Since it hit the internet, however, it has had over
500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed
is that good men do nothing.. It’s happening right now.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

What is Barack Obama

Subject: Who Is Barack Obama?

This takes a few minutes to read, but you will be astounded when you see all of these facts in one document..
Please take time to read it and then pass it on..

A brilliant summation regarding the great mystery of WHO IS BARACK OBAMA?
By Joe Crews and Harvey Wysong Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Barack Obama is less of a person than an image - a brand. People see whatever they want as they do on a Rorschach test. But does anyone really know him?

In fact, he is:
An empty suit.
A man with no birth certificate.
A man who was deserted in childhood by his biological father.
A man whose birth records, both in the United States and Kenya , are sealed by government order.

A man whose childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, spied on U.S. military installations in Hawaii for the Soviet Union , edited a communist newspaper, authored pornographic novels, and wrote poetry in praise of Joseph Stalin.
A man mentored by and still supported by radical Muslims.
A man who promised transparency in government, but has spent over a million dollars in legal fees hiding information that would determine his eligibility to be President.
A man whose academic records are sealed from kindergarten through law school.
A man who arrived in New York in June of 1981 without enough money to get a hotel room, but one month later flew to Indonesia and Pakistan .
Why did he go?
Who paid his expenses?
A man who traveled to Pakistan when it was illegal for U.S. citizens to do so. So what country's passport did he use?

A man whose Law School Admission Test scores and grades at Columbia University are known to have been mediocre, but was admitted to Harvard Law School through the intervention of a Saudi named Khalid al-Mansour.
A law review editor who never published an article in any law review.
A lawyer with no significant accomplishments in the law and no reputation in the legal community.
A former State and U.S. Senator, who never authored a piece of legislation..
A disciple of the Marxist Saul Alinsky.
A product of the Chicago political machine-the most corrupt political organization in America .

A man who selects Marxists, corrupt politicians, and criminals as his close political associates and personal friends.
A man whose presidential candidacy was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America,
the Socialist International, and the Workers International League.
A man lauded for the literary brilliance of two memoirs, both of which were ghostwritten by others.
A so-called Christian who says that knowing when human life begins is "above his pay-grade," but somehow knows that abortion is permissible at any stage.

A man who thinks "waterboarding" is immoral, but that partial-birth abortion is moral.
A man who publicly laments slavery in America-which was abolished 150 years ago-but praises Islam,
which still practices both slavery and the sexual mutilation of young girls.
A man who speaks endlessly about helping the less fortunate, but gives almost none of his sizeable
income to charity-not even to his half-brother, who is living in squalor in Kenya ..
A man who had the most left-wing voting record in the United State Senate, but was predicted by the press to "govern from the middle."

A man who has never created a job, met a payroll, or even operated a lemonade stand, but wants to tell Detroit how to make cars.
A President who has never before served as an executive in either the private or the public sector.
A Commander-in-Chief who doesn't know how to shoot a rifle, throw a hand-grenade, drive a tank, fly a plane, or con a ship.
A Commander-in-Chief who has publicly divulged some of our nation's most important intelligence secrets.
A man who has been put in charge of the largest economic engine that ever existed, but has never invested in the stock market and admits total ignorance of it.
A President who says that science will guide his administration, but has no education in the sciences.

A man who is proficient in reading what is written for him on a teleprompter, but jerks and stammers
his way through any off-the-cuff speaking.
A man whose health records are sealed from childhood to the present day.
A man whose educational records are sealed from childhood through law school.

A man who spent 20 years in a church whose pastor espouses Marxist Liberation Theology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-semitism, but claims he never heard his pastor utter anti-American, and anti-Semitic statements.
A man who added more to the National Debt in 100 days than all other Presidents did in the past 220 years, yet feels qualified to lecture Americans about "fiscal responsibility".

A man who publicly expressed disdain for the U.S. Constitution on a Chicago radio station because it limited the government's ability to "redistribute wealth."
The first American President to bow before a foreign head of state-a Muslim dictator.
A man who sits and listens submissively while his country is castigated by Daniel Ortega-a Communist thug whose own daughter accused him of raping her.

A narcissist who gave the Queen of England a present from the United States --an iPod containing recordings of his own speeches.
A so-called Christian who officially declared "Pride Month" for a lifestyle that the Bible calls an abomination.
A man who wanted Americans to ignore his Muslim name during his election campaign, yet boasts of his Muslim name when he travels to Muslim countries.

A man who can name hundreds of America 's shortcomings, yet none of its great accomplishments.
A President who claims the moral high ground by closing Gitmo yet supports the transfer of terror suspects to countries where horrific torture is certain.

A President who scoffed at being called a socialist yet acted to nationalize the auto industry, the banking industry, and the insurance industry . . . and now seeks to nationalize the health care industry.
A President who violates private property rights, the sanctity of contracts, and the rule of law-three essential principles that go back over a thousand years in the Common Law tradition.
A man who promised 95% of all Americans a tax cut, but is increasing taxes on 100% of the population through inflation-the cruelest tax of all.

A lawyer who represented ACORN-an organization now indicted in several states for voter fraud-whose stated goal is to get as many people on welfare as possible in order to destroy our financial system.
A President who cheated GM's bondholders by giving their property to the UAW in a political payoff.
An American President who frequently criticizes his own country when speaking in foreign countries, but never praises America 's generosity, goodness or greatness.

A President whose Secretary of the Treasury cheated on his taxes-as did several other appointees and advisors.
A President who, despite the current federal debt of 100 trillion dollars, wants to add the greatest debt ever by nationalizing health care.
A President who scoffs at being called a socialist, yet has appointed 28 "Czars" to circumvent constitutional government, including: A "Science Czar" who has advocated compulsory abortions for American women and the "surrender of sovereignty" to a "comprehensive Planetary Regime."
A self-professed communist as his "Green Jobs Czar".
A "Pay Czar" to regulate the pay of corporate executives.
A President who swore an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic,"yet has nominated a domestic enemy of the Constitution to the Supreme Court.
A President whose Homeland Security Chief classified pro-lifers, veterans, and supporters of traditional marriage as terrorists.

A President who stood silent while the Iranian government hacked unarmed protestors to death with axes, because it was an internal matter, but freely offers his opinions about the internal affairs of Israel and Honduras .
A President who decreed that true acts of terrorism must now be described as "man-made disasters."
A President who cracks hurtful jokes about Special Olympians.
A President who refused to intercept or inspect a North Korean ship virtually certain to be carrying Weapons of Mass Destruction to Burma .

A President who wants to cancel all missile defenses while rogue nations are developing long-range ballistic missiles.
An American President who blames the violence in Mexico on America .
A Commander in Chief who claims to have been unaware that Air Force One was taken on a terrifying, low-level photo-op over Manhattan

A President who berates American CEO's for flying in private planes at private expense on company business, but whose wife spends hundreds of housands tax payer dollars flying to Paris for a shopping spree.
A President who promised a transparent administration, but requires all questions be screened before "impromptu" appearances.
A man who freely admitted that his energy policies are designed to bankrupt the American coal industry.

A President who has presided over the loss of 14.7 million jobs and whose "energy policy" will cause the loss of another 1 million jobs.
A President whose "energy policy" will increase the average American's utility bills by over $2,000 a year in the middle of the Great Recession.
A man about whom liberal journalist Tom Brokaw said, "There's a lot about him we don't know," just one week before the election.

The vast majority of Americans do not know who he is, but someone surely does. Someone paid for his travel expenses to Pakistan and Indonesia . Someone engineered legal challenges to all of his election opponents for the State Senate and had them disqualified. Someone straightened and leveled his path to the U.S. Senate when a Democrat Judge made public the child custody records of his Republican opponent. When he was a candidate for the U.S. Senate, someone arranged for him to speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Someone saw to it that all of his records were sealed, both at home and abroad. Someone assembled the massive organization for his run for the Presidency. Someone knows all about him.


Monday, December 7, 2009

Become an Under Ground Pupblisher



It has been my repeated experience to discover that nearly every person I have inter acted with in commerce and socially have no idea that Obama is being challenged in American courts and elsewhere to produce his legal records to prove he is eligible to be our president. In fact in a recent AOL survey 67% of the people believe Obama is qualified under the Constitution to be president.

The really big lesson we learned since Obama’s campaign is that main stream and Fox media are definitely suppressing vital information needed by the American public in order to make the right voting and other survival decisions. Those of us fortunate enough to be connected to the inter net are able to research and get vital news facts that a large percentage of the American public does not. We need to become a beacon of truth and facts for the benefit of our country.

It is vital to the restoration of America that the facts regarding the history and actions of this current government be revealed to a far larger number of the American public than to just we the inter net members. There will be minimum to no restoration of America until at least 70% of America’s population agrees it is necessary to restore America now, by challenging the legitimacy of the current government; the integrity of congress and Senate and ethics of the judicial system.

It is obvious we need to begin our own information net work to get facts to all of America. We need our own news paper—with or without advertisers. We need our own system of distribution. We need our own TV news network. Obviously, it will take time, money, and experienced, ethical people in these various media to get it started and keep it running. There is no time to wait for it to happen. We need it last year—during the 2008 campaign. So how do we do it with what we have got? Let us each become anonymous underground publishers and distributors of this information in our daily life.

What if each and every blogger, poster, and website owner printed just one factual article relating to any one of the law suits—past or present challenging Obama to produce his sealed records and left copies wherever he/she goes—doctor’s office, super market, restaurants, hardware stores, back of the church, gym, and so on.

Put one simple head line on it. Suggestions to name the paper:
Your own ideas are probably superior to the following:





1.Find a very well written article about the challenge of Obama’s eligibility you think sums up the issue best,
2.Ask permission of the writer or web site to print it Most of them would be glad to give you permission as it would help drive traffic to their web sites.
3.You could use an actual court filed document—that is public record and it gives absolute authenticity and can be easily validated because of the court filing numbers on it

4.Print it and make 100 or more copies—depending on you time, money, & energy

5.Take them with you everywhere you go, leave whatever number of copies at each place

You can choose to do this anonymously—like an under ground newspaper. You could decide to leave contact information. You could develop the newsletter into an opportunity to sell ads or you could simply just continue to get out the message. Any way you choose, the most important action is to continue brining the information the media refuses to publish and let anyone and every one know the TRUTH AND FACTS.

There are 300,000,000+ Americans who must learn truth from the sophistry heaped upon America, today. If there are at least 100,000 bloggers who start publishing one article a week and print only 100 and leave them wherever they go, that will reach 1,000,000. That 1,000,000 reach 2,000,000 and soon it will catch on.

There are many sources to find these articles—Orly Taitz has published all her filed briefs. Mario Puzzo, Phil Berg, Leo Donofrio, and other also have filed briefs in the courts—all of those are available to the public. The Heritage Foundation, The Oath Keepers, Citizenwells, The Right Side of America, We The People Foundation, The jag hunter, WND and so on are all excellent sources of material on this subject. With their permission—let’s get the word out to the others who—for whatever reason—are still in the dark. Wouldn’t this take away the thunder of those who choose to denigrate the just Americans for daring to challenge Obama’s legitimacy?

JBJD says: “. . . why not copy and distributed Attorney Bob Bauer’s footnote in Hollister? Or copies of requests to NP and Alice Germond to provide the documentation on which they based their Certification BO was qualified, along with the responses showing they refused to answer the question?

(And why would anyone who ostensibly wants to ‘out’ BO omit the work posted on my blog from a campaign purportedly aimed at revealing the truth?)”

Portuguese Revolutionary War Hero - Peter Francisco says:

“Great advice which I have mentioned many times.
Spread the word especially bring more and more people to this blog and others, so every piece of info you put out there ALWAYS include this blog address or others. Leave it in bathrooms, bulletin boards, bus stops, trains, etc.
Also tell all your friends and family that the Fraud of ACORN, Global Warming, John Edwards and Tiger Woods affairs were all DENIED but the Truth Prevailed the Truth of Obama Eligibility May also be a Massive Cover-Up because where there has been smoke we found fire. Someone that is a man of Transparency would not hire high price lawyers and Spend over 2 Million dollars fighting close to 100 lawsuits in courts to keep his Identity Secret and his Great School records SEALED. Only a FRAUD would work this hard to Fool We The People.

Instead of ridiculing those that question it like, Dobbs, Dr. Orly Taitz, and many other Patriots and Now Sarah Palin WHY NOT PROVE US ALL WRONG and show the Documents?
We will Prevail to find the Truth about Obama’s FRAUD just like we did with the other cases above, I only hope it won’t take long for the sake of the Constitution and our American Way.

Truth will Prevail.
God Bless US
Submitted by usapatriots-shout.blogspot.com

Sunday, November 29, 2009

vote Them Out


Thanks - CS C L McW

Fellow Americans, patriots all, following is a list of blood suckers, who have been feeding at your trough for many years and need to be replaced by personnel who know and understand that this job is guaranteed only for as long as we elect them to put partisan politics aside for the good of the UNITED STATES as a whole, & not for any particular State.

An example of what we have let them become, is John D. Murtha of Pennsylvania who openly lies when it suits him as others do from time to time. This must stop and they will not stop unless we administer a very painful punishment. That brings to mind, the only punishment we can administer that they will remember, VOTE THEM OUT...Remember, we must not allow any show that they put on for our benefit, to confuse the “poor dumb asses, they will believe what we tell them”...huh!!!

Following is a hit-list of the Senate for whom the bells toll in 2010; we must vote them out!!! IF You do not want to vote for the status quo, have no known replacements, the just pencil in a name of somebody Local. IF you have no choice at all, then write me in, that should give them something to think about!!!

This Nation was founded by all personnel without experience. Have we made it so confusing that no one other than an experienced politician can half way understand it??

- Received as originally formatted ~ CK



Bayh, Evan; (D-IN) Bennet, Michael; (D-OH) Bennett, Robert; (R-UT) Bond, Christopher; (R-MO)

BOXER, BARBARA (D-CA) Brownback, Sam; (R-KS) Bunning, Jim; ®-KY) Burr, Richard; (R-NC)

Burris, Roland; (D-IL) Coburn, Tom; (R-OK) Crapo, Mike; (R-ID) DeMint, Jim; ®-SC)

DODD, CHRISTOPHER; (D-CT) Dorgan, Byron; (D-ND) Voinovich, George; ®-OH) Wyden, Ron; (D-OR)

Feingold, Russ; (D-WI) Gillibrand, Kirsten; (D-NY) Grassley, Charles; (R-IA) Gregg, Judd; ®-NH)

Inouye, Daniel; (D-HI) Isakson, Johnny; ®-GA) Thune, John; (R-SD) SPECTER, ARLEN; (I-PA)

Kaufman, Ted; (D-DE) Leahy, Patrick; (D-VT) Martinez, Mel ®-FL) MCCAIN, JOHN; (traitor)®-AZ)

Mikulski, Barbara; (D-MD) Murkowski, Lisa; (R-AK) Murray, Patty; (D-WA) REID, HARRY; (D-NV)

SCHUMER, CHARLES; (D-NY) Shelby, Richard; (R-AL) Byrd, Robert; (D-WV)


Vitter, Davitter;(®-LA) Orrin Hatch (®-Ut)


Following is a hit-list of the House of Rep’s for whom the bells toll in 2010; we must vote them out!!! T hey must be in alphabetical order by States, to make it easier for me.

The House: (Ref. Party)


Jo Bonner ® Bobby Bright (D) Michael D. Rogers ® Robert B. Aderholt ®

Spencer Bachus ® Artur Davis (D)


Don Young ®


Trent Franks ® John B. Shadegg ® Ed Pastor (D) Jeff Flake ® Raul M. Grijalva (D)


Marion Barry (D) Vic Snyder (D) John Boozman ® Mike Ross (D-4th)


Mike Thompson (D) Wally Herger ® Dan Lungren ® Doris O. Matsui (D) Lynn C. Woolsey (D)

George Miller (D) NANCY,PELOSI (D) Barbara Lee (D) Ellen Tauscher (D) Fortney Stark, (D)

Anna G. Eshoo (D) Michael M. Honda (D) Zoe Lofgren (D) Sam Farr (D) Jim Costa (D)

Devine Nunes ® Lois Capps (D) Elton Gallegly ® Howard P. McKeon ® David Dreier ®

Brad Sherman (D) Howard L. Berman (D) ADAM B. SCHIFF (D) HENRY A. WAXMAN (D) Xavier Becerra (D)

DIANE FEINSTEIN (D) E. Watson (D) Lucille Roybal-Allard (D) MAXINE WATERS (D) Jane Harman (D)

Grace F. Napolitano (D)

Linda T. Sanchez (D) Ed Royce ® Jerry Lewis ® Gary G. Miller( R) Joe Baca (D)

Ken Calvert ® Mary Bono Mack ® (In Mem of Sony) Dana Rohrabacher ® Loretta Sanchez (D) John Campbell ®

Darrell E. Issa ® Brian P. Bilbray ® Bob Filner (D) Susan A. Davis (D)


Diana DeGette (D) John T. Salazar (D)


Jophn B. Larson (D) Rosa L. DeLauro (D)


Michael N. Castle ®


Jeff Miller ® F. Allen Boyd ® Corrine Brown (D) Ander Crenshaw ® Ginny Brown- Waite ®

Cliff Stearns ® John L. Mica ® C. W. Young ® Adam Putman ® Connie Mack IV ®

Kendrick B. Meek (D) Ileana Ros-Lehtinen ® Robert Wexler (D) Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D) Lincoln Diaz-Balart ®

ALCEE L. HASTINGS (D) Mario Diaz-Balart ®


Jack Kingston ® Sanford D. Bishop, Jr (D) Lynn A. Westmoreland ® John L. Lewis (D) Tom Price ®

John Linder ® Jim Marshall (D) Nathan Deal ® Phil Gingrey ® John Barrow (D)

David Scott (D)


Neil Abercrombie (D)


Mike Simpson ®


Bobby L. Rush (D) Jesse L. Jackson, Jr (D) Daniel Lipinski (D) Luis V. Gutierrez (D) Danny K. Davis (D)

Melissa L. Bean (D) Janice D. Schakowsky (D) Mark S. Kirk ® Deborah L.Halvorson (D)

Jerry F. Costello (D) Judy Biggert ® Bill Foster (D) Timothy V. Johnson ®

Donald A. Manzullo ® John Shimkus ®


Peter J. Visclosky (D) Mark E. Souder ® Steve Buyer ® Dan Bueton ®

Mike Pence ® Andre Carson (D) Baron Hill (D)


Leonard L. Boswell (D) Tom Latham ® Steve King ®


Jerry Moran ® Dennis Moore (D) Todd Tiahrt ®


Ed Whitfield ® John A. Yarmuth (D) Geoff Davis ® Harold Rogers ®

Ben Chandler (D)


Charlie Melancon (D) John Fleming ® Rodney Alexander ® Charles W. Boustany ®


Michael H. Michaud (D)


C. A. Ruppersberger (D) Steny H. Hoyer (D) Roscoe G. Bartlett® Elijah E. Cummings (D)

Chris Van Hollen, Jr(D)


John F. Kerry (D) John W. Oliver (D) Richard E. Neal (D) James P. McGovern (D) Barney (The Queer) Frank (D)

John F. Tierney (D) Edward J. Markey (D) Michael E. Capuano (D) Stephen F. Jynch (D) William D. Delahunt (D)


Bart Stupak (D) Peter Hoekstra ® Vernon J. Ehlers ® Dave Camp ® Dale E. Kildee (D)

Fred Upton ® Mark H. Schauer (D) Michael J. Rogers ® Candice S. Miller ®

Thaddeus C. McCotter ® Sander M. Levin (D) Carolyn C. Kilpatrick (D) JOHN CONYERS, Jr, (D)

John D. Dingell (D)


John Kline ® Betty McCollum (D) Collin C. Peterson (D) James L. Oberstar (D)


Bennie G Thompson (D) Gene Taylor (D)


Wm. Lacy Clay (D) Todd Akin ® Russ Carnahan (D) Lke orIke Skelton (D) Emanuel Cleaver II (D)

Sam Graves ® Roy Blunt ® Jo Ann Emerson ®


Dennis Rehberg ®


Jeff Fortenberry ® Lee Terry ®


Shelley Berkeley (D)




Robert E. Andrews (D) Frank A. LoBionodo ® Christopher H. Smith ® Scott Garrett ® Frank Pallone, Jr (D)

Bill Pascrell, Jr, (D) Steven R. Rothman (D) Donald M. Payne (D) Rodney P. Frelinghuysen ®

Rush D. Holt (D) Albio Sires (D)




Tim Bishop (D) Steve Israel (D) Peter King ® Carolyn McCarthy (D) Gary Ackerman (D)

Gregory Meeks (D) Joseph Crowley (D) Jerrold Nadler (D) Anthony Weiner (D)

Edolphus Towns (D) Yvette Clarke (D) Nydia Velazquez (D) Carolyn Maloney (D)

Charles Rangel (D) Jose Serrano (D) Eliot Engel (D) Nita Lowey (D)

John Hall (D) Paul Tonko (D) Maurice Hinchey (D) Jorn McHugh ®

Brian Higgins (D) Louise McIntosh Slaughter (D)


G. K. Butterfield (D) Bob Etheridge (D) Walter Jones, Jr, ® David Price (D) Virginia Foxx ®

Howard Coble ® Mike McIntyre (D) Sue Myrick ® Patrick McHenry ® Heath Shuler (D)

Melvin Watt (D)




Jean Schmidt ® Michael Turner ® John Boehner ® Marcy Kaptur (D) Dennis Kucinich (D)

Patrick Tiberi ® Steven LaTourette ® Tim Ryan (D)


John Sullivan ® Dan Boren (D) Frank Lucas ® Tom Cole ®


David Wu (D) Greg Walden ® Earl Blumenauer (D) Peter DeFazio (D)


Robert Brady (D) Chaka Fattah (D) Jim Gerlach ® Bill Shuster ® Paul Kanjorski (D)

JOHN MURTHA (D) Allyson Schwartz (D) Mike Doyle (D) Charles Dent ®

Joseph Pitts ® Tim Holden (D) Tim Murphy ® Todd Platts ®


Patrick Kennedy (D) James Langevin (D)


Henry Brown, Jr, ® Joe Wilson ® J. Gresham Barrett ® Bob Inglis ® John Spratt, Jr, (D)

James Clyburn (D)


Stephanie Sandlin (D)


John Duncan, Jr, ® Zach Wamp ® Lincoln Davis (D) Jim Cooper (D) Bart Gordon (D)

Marsha Blackburn ® John Tanner (D)


Louie Gohmert ® Ted Poe ® Sam Johnson ® Ralph Hall ® Jeb Hensarling ®

Joe Barton ® John Culberson ® Kevin Brady ® Al Green (D) Michael McCaul ®

Mike Conaway ® Kay Granger ® William Thornberry ® Ruben Hinojosa (D) Silvestre Reyes (D)

Chet Edwards (D) Sheila Lee (D) Randy Neugebauer ® Charles Gonzalez (D) Lamar Smith ®

Ciro Rodriguez (D) Kenny Marchant ® Lloyd Doggett (D) Michael Burgess ® Solomon Ortiz (D)

Henry Cuellar (D) Gene Green (D) Eddie Johnson (D) John Carter ® Pete Sessions ®


Rob Bishop ® Jim Matheson (D)


Bobby Scott (D) Randy Forbes ® Bob Goodlatte ® Eric Cantor ® James Moran (D)

Rick Boucher (D) Frank Wolf ®


Jay Inslee (D) Rick Larsen (D) Brian Baird (D) Doc Hastings ® Cathy Rodgers ®

Norman Dicks (D) Jim McDermott (D) Dave Reichert ® Adam Smith (D)


Alan Mollohan (D) Shelley Moore ® Nick Rahall (D)


Paul Ryan ® Tammy Baldwin (D) Ron Kind (D) Gwen Moore (D) James Sensenbrenner, Jr, ®

Thomas Petri ® David Obey (D)




American Samoa Delegates: Eni F. H. Faleomavaega (D)

District of Columbia: Eleanor Norton (D)

Guam: Madeline Bordello (D)

Northern Mariana Is lands: Gregorio Sablan (I)

Puerto Rico: Pedro Pierluisi (D)

Virgin Islands: Donna Christensen

Saturday, November 21, 2009

I Will Side With The Muslims


Khalied Sheik Mohammed along with four other animals have been scheduled to be brought to New York, for a “show the world trial”, according to Attorney General, Eric Holder who claims it is his sole decision. (Though Mr. Eric Holder claims it is his and only his choice. Every one knows very well Mr. Holder has no authority to mandate such a decision. Therefore, it was President Obama’s decision.)

Bringing the Muslim animals for trial in New York is being done against loud and clear public protest. This is not in the highest and best good for America. Besides revealing a consistent track record of ignoring the voice of America when it protests vital issues, the President’s administration clearly shows it favors Muslims over non Muslim Americans. The President is living true to his words when he said in one of his books—

“If the winds turn against the Muslims, I WILL SIDE WITH THE MUSLIMS.”

Mr. Eric Holder’s primary defense of this heinous decision is it is an opportunity to “show the world how great the American judicial system is.” The world already knows about the American judicial system. (That is why we are over run with illegal’s and constant victims of terrorist attacks.) Why in God’s –not Allah’s—world at this time in our history do we need to grand stand America’s legal system? Honestly, with America’s economic crisis as it is, who gives a fart about what the world thinks how we handle five disgusting Muslims who terrorized and murdered innocent Americans. The detainees to be tried have already admitted their guilt. They have already chosen the death penalty. (They are anxious to meet their 72 virgins.) If they must be tried, there are military tribunals to do so who can do the job with considerably less cost and notoriety. There was one already set up at Gitmo until Obama had it shut down. (I think because the judge refused Obama’s orders to post pone a trial in progress.)

Governor Patterson, Rudy Giuliani, don’t want it. Carl Rove, Dick Morris, Michele Malkin, Senators Jon Kyle, John McCain, Orrin Hatch, Sarah Palin (Yes, I value her opinion.) question this decision. The New Yorkers and most Americans don’t want it. Staging that trial in New York will incur many problems the President seems to ignore—holding quarters for the detainees, security problems transporting them to and fro the court, security problems in the court, the length and cost of the trial at you know whose expense? The president is placing New York and America in imminent danger and triggering excruciatingly painful memories to the families of the nearly 3000 victims? The entire trial will decriminalize the terrorist while Janet Napolitano’s Homeland Security Report criminalizes patriotic dissenting Americans.

With the immediate over whelming problems in America, why would any allegedly sane President indulge in the futile luxury of entertaining the world with a “show trial”? Perhaps the better question is who really benefits from such a farce trial? According to the many pundits who protest this choice, only the defendants and their Muslim terrorist gang would benefit. Such a trial would give undeserved glory to terrorist cause, denigrate America, antagonize public and private conflicts among many diverse groups, and will probably lead to riots between Muslims and non Muslims. (This government has no clue to how fed up the American people have become over Muslims) While the above statements are only my speculation, the strong possibility of them becoming a reality should be sufficient for any concerned President to refrain from proceeding with this—which will go down in history as one of the top ten follies of Obama’s illegal career. This leads to the next burning question. In the face of America’s vehement protest of this New York trial, what is the real reason Obama insists upon forcing this fiasco in New York?

Me thinks—or guesses: The secret reason President Obama’s Muslim puppet masters want these five sinister characters in New York is because they have something far more spectacular planned for our be leagued America. Me guesses the President is clearly and ruthlessly putting America in harms way. There are hundreds of ways terrorists could attack us. There is no security system big enough to cover all the possibilities. What great symbolism to do so while the World Trade Center pigs are on trial just blocks away from the crime scene!

Yes, I know, the following is pure speculation on my part. Yes I know it can never be proven in our life time. Yes, I know I will be called of all sorts of demeaning names, but here goes:

Based upon the President’s track record from the first day he held office, I have concluded the President is a puppet president who takes orders from George Soros and certain unknown Muslim leaders around the globe.

It was the President’s choice to hold the five animals from Gitmo in New York. Personally, what I see of the President, he could care less about the Gitmo detainees. His only primary concern is himself, his image, traveling the world bowing apologizing for America. Therefore, it appears he is merely following orders from one of his secret Muslim puppet masters or George Soros who also cavorts with Muslims. Whoooooaa! Now you are convinced I have lost what little of a mind I have left. Before you totally reject me as an off the wall over the top certifiable nut, examine with me President Obama’s track record since day one.

People imagine they have secrets from the world. They do not. The thoughts they harbor give way to action. The action gives way to habit. Soon their habits reveal to the whole world their secrets.

The President & company’s track record are beginning to reveal the secrets of his real loyalties including what seems to be his primary motivations.

From day one Obama’s first official business was to call an Arab leader and have an interview with him. (I don’t remember his name.) Then he produced and posted that insane video to Achmadinamad of Iran. The posture of the President went something like this:

“We love you. We want to be your friend. We just want to talk. We will not impose any preconditions to our talk. Come to the White House for dinner, sometime, soon.”

Well, with Iran’s nuclear missile program rapidly progressing, we know how well that went.

What about The President’s trip to Egypt, Turkey, Somalia, and Iraq? We know what he said in his long winded speech in Egypt and other countries he visited. He admitted in Egypt he is a Muslim. (He has also admitted in other public events that he is a Muslim. The Muslim world accepts him as a Muslim.) He claimed in Turkey AMERICA IS a MUSLIM COUNTRY! ! ! ! !

What we do not know is:


Were you not the least bit shocked by An American President’s silence when the citizens of Iran were being beaten and slaughtered for protesting their corrupt election that kept mad man Ach-mad-inijad in office? Wasn’t the President’s silence was really loud? Those luckless and courageous protesters were begging for some words, any words of support from America. All they got was beaten, murdered and the great American Presidential silence. I wonder who shut up the President during that time. Could the silence be because the President really doesn’t believe in freedom and secretly—in his heart of hearts—loves dictatorships, monarchies, (Bowed to King of Saudi, Arabia and the Japanese Emperor)? Maybe he was simply following orders from some unknown Muslim who secretly contributed millions to Obama’s campaign?

We also know per the President’s insistence, Congress recently passed the funding of SEVERAL MILLION DOLLARS to that socially delightful group in Palestine, the HAMAS. (This is just more grist for the mill about Congress’s foolishness and the President’s Muslim passion.) The money is to assist them in relocating to America and help them establish life in America. In the interest of length, I won’t go into Barry’s anti Israel policies and actions.

The President believes if he calls a sows ear a silk purse, it then makes the ear a silk purse. (I think he gets redefining words to make them mean something else from slick, cold David Axelrod.) He calls looting America and a dirty slush fund a “Stimulus Plan” to create jobs. Hah! Then the President forbids the use of the term “war on terror” and insists it be replaced with “man made disaster.” Hah, ha! Haven’t they noticed? No one is listening to them. Doesn’t this make you wonder what they are smoking in the WH? It makes me wonder if the President, Axelrod and the rest may be truly be delusional.

Nidal Malik Hassan is a Muslim terrorist who attacked unarmed, innocent men, women, and a fetus. Under the cloak of political correctness the President is insisting upon calling the attack on Fort Hood the act of a man suffering from post traumatic stress syndrome who simply acted independently. The President thinks it makes it so because he said so in spite of all facts that contradict it. Then the President ordered a halt on the investigation? He doesn’t want to offend the Muslims. He doesn’t want to offend the Muslims? ? ? What about the 300,000,000 Americans he has offended by his “political correctness” protecting Muslims? It doesn’t seem to bother him for a single moment he has offended 300,000,000 Americans. It also doesn’t seem to bother the President that 13 and 1 on the way were killed in their line of duty. Over 30 were wounded by this good but suffering Muslim. The President didn’t even salute the photos of those who so senselessly died when he attended their memorial. Would some one please tell me what is so special about Muslims, that the world must walk on eggs so as not to offend them?

“A terrorist is a terrorist. By any other named is still a terrorist.”

This laundry list I have compiled is just the tip of the iceberg. The collection of pro Muslim anti American deeds by the President has committed since day one would fill an encyclopedia.

The following was e-mailed to me a few days ago. I have seen other versions of this. I don’t know who wrote it. Here goes:

“A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to them selves.

Absolutely No Profiling ! Pause a moment, reflect back, and take the following multiple choice test.

These events are actual events from history. They really happened!
Do you remember?


1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by:
a. Superman
b. Jay Leno
c. Harry Potter
d. A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by :
a. Olga Corbett
b. Sitting Bull
c. Arnold Schwarzenegger
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by:
a. Lost Norwegians
b. Elvis
c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women
d . Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

4. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:
a. John Dillinger
b. The King of Sweden
c. The Boy Scouts
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
a. A pizza delivery boy
b. Pee Wee Herman
c. Geraldo Rivera
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
a. The Smurfs
b. Davey Jo nes
c. The Little Mermaid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens , and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:
a. Captain Kidd
b. Charles Lindberg
c. Mother Teresa
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
a. Scooby Doo
b. The Tooth Fairy
c. The Sundance Kid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
a. Richard Simmons
b. Grandma Moses
c. Michael Jo rdan
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
a. Mr. Rogers
b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill's women problems
c. The World Wrestling Federation
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers.
Thousands of people were killed by:
a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd
b. The Supreme Court of Florida
c. Mr Bean
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
a. Enron
b. The Lutheran Church
c. The NFL
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
a. Bonnie and Clyde
b. Captain Kangaroo
c. Billy Graham
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you?
So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people. They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss,
but leave Muslim Males between the ages 17 and 40 alone lest they be guilty of profiling.

Let's send this to as many people as we can so that the Gloria Aldreds and other dunder-headed attorneys along with Federal Justices that want to thwart common sense, feel ashamed of themselves -- if they have any such sense.

As the writer of the award winning story 'Forrest Gump' so aptly put it, 'Stupid is as stupid does.'



Intimidation then Normalization

What is the difference between Marxism, Communism, and Socialism? These days, not much. In the beginning
the main difference was disagreement on how to achieve their common goal of complete control of a Nation's
people, resources and wealth.

The ideologies melded over the years and even though the movement for world domination suffered many
setbacks, Communism did not die with the fall of the Berlin wall and the rending of the iron curtain.The word
Communism became so unpopular the name changed to Socialism, then Liberalism, then to Progressive.
They have even been somewhat open about what they are doing, the Communist goals for the United States
were entered into the Congressional record in June, 1963. They stopped using bombs and tanks
to conquer and pillage, their formula now is, I. I. D. I. N. Infiltrate, Indoctrinate, Demoralize, Intimidate then follows
Normalization. Infiltration started in the U.S. in earnest in the late 1940's. Indoctrination began in earnest
in the 1960's.

A KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov who defected in 1970 and taped an interview (video and partial transcript embedded here:)
America In Peril
said in 1984 that the Indoctrination and Demoralization of America was complete. The promotion of ugly art and music
and calling it beautiful, the promotion of promiscuity, perversion and nudity are now considered "freedom of speech".
and "freedom of expression." Bezmenov said the American people after 25 years of indoctrination and demoralization
were no longer able to assimilate true information, that showered with facts, photos, and even seeing with their own
eyes they still would not believe.

America is now in the Intimidation stage, as witnessed by the attacks on critics of the Administration. The threats
to Insurance companies and banks that would not accept Government control. All that is needed now is a Crisis
severe enough to give the Government an excuse to isolate incarcerate and neutralize dissenters. A pandemic such
as a more deadly (mutated version) of the H1N1 virus could be used as an excuse.

If the current health care plan is passed, and the Cap and Trade Bill is passed, the attacks on dissenters will continue
until the people are enslaved. Then there will be a period of Normalization. Every aspect of American lives will
be controlled by the Government.

Marion A. Valentine
U.S.N. Intelligence Service (disabled)
Email: marionvalentine66@yahoo.com

Monday, November 9, 2009

Global Crime Families United

As many of you know, I served in Navy Intelligence for nine years, so am familiar with the Marxist/Socialists messages and methods.
I spent over a year researching Obama and wrote over a year ago that he was selected, tutored and groomed to become the puppet
Socialist leader of America, with the help of a compliant media. A compliant media who shaped the mood of the country by spending
eight years bashing Bush, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. If anyone notices they are using the same words to oppose the surge
in Afghanistan that they used to oppose the surge in Iraq. Does "civil war", "quagmire" and "the war can't be won by military force"
sound familiar.

My personal favorite message the Marxists/Socialists who now control all branches of our Government used to shape
public opinion and try to insure defeat in Iraq is "Bush lied about Saddam's
WMDs, his nuke program and the threat to our National Security, and men died. What they media fails to report, is that every Democrat
from 1998 till Jan. 2001 who could get before a camera, a mike, or in print were shouting about Saddam's WMDs, his nuke program,
his connection and aid to terrorists, and his imminent threat to our National Security. The question was never asked..."Who lied, hyped
or cherry picked intelligence to convince them BEFORE George Bush was elected

The Marxist/Socialists always couch their messages in "equality" and "humanity", but their methods are the same as organized crime.
They intimidate or eliminate all opposition.

The One worlders are groups of crime families who have united to dominate the entire world, to exploit the people, the natural resources
and wealth for their personal gain. They spout equality, humanity and civil rights as their goals. But their methods belie their words.
Equality to them means being equally poor and dependent on them for every aspect of your existence.

In less than a year Obama has amassed more power unto himself than any president in history and his tentacles intrude into every
nook and cranny of our lives. He gleefully signs America's sovereignty over to the United Nations, where the representatives of
the Global Godfathers dictate rules for the world to follow. Giving the UN power to enforce international law through international
courts, and levy taxes on citizens of soon to be no longer sovereign nations.

We The People can take our country back, and return to the principals and values of our Founding Fathers. For several generations
we were not vigilant and allowed laws that were unconstitutional to be forced upon us. We allowed our educational system to be
taken over and become indoctrination centers for our children. We allowed the media to be taken over to become propaganda

But across this nation the people are waking up, are uniting and will take our beloved country back
God Bless America.

Marion A. Valentine
U.S. Navy Intelligence Service (disabled)
email marionvalentine66@yahoo.com

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

The Eagle Weeps As The Turkey Fouls Its Nest

October 28
The Eagle Weeps As The Turkey Fouls Its Nest
The eagle (America) weeps as common sense has been replaced by "political correctness.
As civility, morality and ethics have been replaced by vulgarity, lewdness,and greed.

The turkey continues to foul the land by using the powers of his office to steal the
fruits of labor from hard working people and rewarding those who made bad decisions,
and those just too damn lazy to take advantage of the opportunities to succeed. Those
who have been indoctrinated into believing they are "Victims" therefore they are owed.

To pharse the words of Kevin Rudd:
Quote: 'IMMIGRANTS, NOT Americans, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on the twin towers , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans.'

'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom. We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, Learn the Language!'

'Most Americans believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture...'

'We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.'

'This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great American freedom, THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.'

'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.'

Our Government governs with the Consent of the People, and since Congress only has a 28% approval rating, It would seem that consent
has been taken away, and it is time to replace ALL of those who think our constitution no longer has any meaning.

Marion A. Valentine
U.S.N. Intelligence Service (disabled)

11:10 AM | Blog it

The Obama Deception

Continental congress Live

Obama to sign treaty to give up American sovereignty


For The Record

Search Posts

Medical Martial Law

Obama Health Care Plan is a Duplicate of HItler's Health Care Plan

Obama poisoned his grandmother

Hitler's Health Plan same as Obama's

object width="480" height="295">

We The People Congress.org / blog

USA must Wake Up About Muslims

Must Listen--Here's to You Obama--We Are Not Stupid