judicata-stated on www.telegraph.co.uk on 12/30/09

Barack Hussein Obama II is an unmitigated failure. Europe should not expect anything great from this loser, and certainly do not expect him to protect you, let alone America. He is only into protecting himself and his distorted image of what he thinks he is.

I don’t want the British public to think Americans are happy with Barack Hussein Obama II, they are not. Anyone not in the ObamaCamp are the so-called minority, targeted, and all in a position where its been impossible challenging any illegalities in his system, but most especially the illegal votes that were cast in favor of him. No one’s talking about THAT.

Nearly all websites that do not glorify this newly anointed Messiah have had attempted hack jobs, and all share the ObamaBlogBots using up posting space to neutralize the bad press against Obama. These BlogBots are on “someone’s” payroll, and there are thousands of them enlisted to disrupt and sling $#@!!. Their 24hr job is to just troll the internet and diffuse bad press against Obama and to stop the truth from spreading.

This last terror attack by the Crotch Bomber was met with the typical “let them eat cake” attitude of this narcissistic president; he went on with his golf game and chowing down on his prime rib–courtesy of the US Taxpayer. Needless to say he takes his entire extended family with him on Air Force One whenever he goes on a “vacation” which is often. Hard to stomach when so many of us have lost our jobs and homes and cannot feed our families. This guy doesn’t give a damn. We have block after block in state after state that are empty shops. People are not spending money, they are afraid. We have tourist towns that now look like ghost towns.

This autocrat in the White House is ill-equipped to deal with life in general, but more to the point, he has denigrated the office of the President by appointing his personal yahoos as yes men. He is subjected the US and the world to further attacks. He takes nothing seriously except to put the onus back on the American people.

The world needs to know, that many of us in the US are now hostage to this new-order regime, one where we cannot speak out as we want and are subject to ridicule and retaliation if and when we do complain. ALL complainers are termed “racists.” This newly minted Obama-mentality has trickled down into every government department including our state offices and state police forces. If you want to know what’s really going on in America, seek out Police Blogs for many states, for instance, California and you will see how corrupt it is. Start at http://www.ratemycop.com and then search for more. It was not this way before Obama got elected.

Barack Hussein Obama II has broken every promise he used to get elected. He IS a liar. And it is now clear that he had no intention of fulfilling those promises and had no intention of doing what is in the best interests of America, let alone the rest of the world.

judicata on Dec 30th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
Report comment

Yes We Can!

It is going to be an action year this 2010.

YES WE CAN!

Look what the American Grand Jury is doing now! Dr. Taitz will be appearing before Judge Lamberth this January 25, 2010. Let’s all support this in any and all ways we can!

The Honorable Royce C. Lamberth
Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Columbia

Re: Grand Jury Presentments
Defendants: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi
Docket Number: Misc. No. 09-346 (RCL)

Judge Lamberth,

The sin of the people is to lose faith in their Constitution. The sin of our Judiciary is to procrastinate while enforcing the Constitution.

American Grand Jury

Judge Lamberth, apparently procrastination is now in full force and effect in your Court. Your Honor, the question is, how serious does a Constitutional crisis have to become before the Judiciary will act? Is the workload of the Judiciary so overwhelming that the Constitution has to wait in line to receive recognition or service?

Barack Obama has committed serious crimes against our Nation. The evidence is well documented and published. Barack Obama has admitted in public and his writings that his father was not a US citizen. Clearly, Obama can never qualify as a “natural born” citizen. The Constitution states that only a “natural born” citizen shall be eligible for the Office of the Presidency. It is so simple, a 10 year old child can grasp the truth. Yet power and corruption would seek to quash and deny the truth to the People of the United States. Does the Justice system in this country think that most citizens are so ignorant that they cannot understand a simple clause in the Constitution?

Your Honor, we would imagine these statements are not what you wanted to hear. Matter of fact, we understand that our statments probably make you angry or make you want to reprimand those that challenge your Court or authority. Well, your Honor, get in line. Many are now challenging your intentions. It is now estimated that 60% of Americans want to know the truth about Barack Obama. He has spent close to 2.0 million dollars fighting something like 15 civil lawsuits to hide the truth about his citizenship. Each time a Judge says this is a “jurisdictional” issue or a “standing” issue the People want to throw up. The day the Constitution or the People no longer have jurisdiction or standing in this Country is the day the Judiciary can no longer be trusted to defend or administrate the laws of our land.

Time is no longer a luxury the Judiciary has to waste. Before the Court is a 21-page document that charges Barack Obama with “Eligibility Fraud and Treason.” It further charges Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi with “Conspiracy of Election Fraud.” They are extremely serious criminal charges. These charges can and must be heard in a court of law. If Obama can produce a valid Birth Certificate proving that he was born in the United States, and further prove his birth mother and father were citizens of the United States, then the man’s name will be exonerated and the case closed forever. But this proof has never been offered and the people have the right to know. Obama no longer has the right to conceal the truth, not when it concerns a blatant criminal violation of the Constitution. The charges have been levied against the man. The question is, what is this Court going to do about it?

Judge Lamberth, we fight evil by exposing it. Once the truth is known, evil has no power over you or your Court. The People of this country are a lot stronger than the government would lead us to believe. The talk that our Country could never survive an election scandal is simply an excuse. The truth of the matter is this Country cannot survive an attack on the Constitution by a public criminal when the Judiciary fails to do anything about it.

American Grand Jury and its members have gone to great lengths to study the evidence and hand down our Presentments. We have served your Court with these Presentments and responded to your Orders. “Time is of the essence.” It is now time to act. Talk is cheap and words become meaningless if Judges such as yourself are in a position to act but fail to do so.

Judge Lamberth, we wish you a Happy New Year. We know the decisions before you are not easy. Nothing in life is easy. Our Country was founded on courage, conviction and action. May the Lord guide you in your decisions, may He bless you with strength and courage.

Respectfully,

American Grand Jury

Attachments:
American Grand Jury Presentments
Judge Lamberth Orders One and Two
American Grand Jury Motion to Reconsider
American Grand Jury Response to Order

Petition names submitted by ____ United States citizens

Yes We Can remove the usurper from office in 2010!

Call them enablers and ridicule them!

2010 will be the year we patriots are going to turn the tables on all those who attempted to ridicule us for assuming our constitutional duty by demanding Barry Sotoero prove he meets the qualifications to be president according to article 2 in the Constitution.

We shall point out that any one who does not consider the national security of America, the economic well being of Americans, and the protection and defense of the constitution a major patriotic priority is an enabler, aider and abettor of a fraudulent government and the usurpation of the presidency. They are also coconspirators in their own undesired destinies!

BRITISH LAW DECLARES OBAMA A BRITISH CITIZEN!

British Law declares Obama a British citizen !!!
Legal Analysis by John Charlton

The Union Jack, symbol of British tyranny and oppresion to the American revolutionaries, has flown over the head of Barack Obama from his birth.

(Dec. 24, 2009) — Barack Hussein Obama has written 2 biographies about himself and has publicly spoken of his origins in many public speeches. He claims as his biological and legal father, a man who went by the name Barrack Hussein Obama. That is the more common Kenyan spelling of the name. His claimed father also went by the names “Barak” and “Barack”, the former when he penned an article in an journal on economics, in Nairobi, in the 60’s, the latter when he registered at the University of Hawaii. The latter form appears on the electronic image of Obama’s alleged Certification of Live Birth.

If we apply the provisions of British and Kenyan law to the simple facts, which Obama claims about himself — though in truth there is not documentation that the public has seen to confirm the truth of these facts — the inescapable conclusion is that Obama was born a British subject and is now, still to this day, a British citizen.

The laws and regulations which lead to this conclusion are the official British Consular Registry Stipulations, the British Nationality Act of 1948 and of 1981, Kenya Constitution, and the Kenya Independence Act of 1963.

Let’s see how these apply to Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that he’d be born a ‘British Citizen by Descent’

The British Consular Registry uses the criteria set forth in the British Nationality Act of 1948 Section 5(1) of the United Kingdom and Colonies to determine who would be qualified as a “British Citizen By Descent.”

Section 5-1 reads thus:

5.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth:

Provided that if the father of such a person is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent only, that person shall not be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by virtue of this section unless—

(a) that person is born or his father was born in a protectorate, protected state, mandated territory or trust territory or any place in a foreign country where by treaty, capitulation, grant, usage, sufferance, or other lawful means, His Majesty then has or had jurisdiction over British subjects; or

(b) that person’s birth having occurred in a place in a foreign country other than a place such as is mentioned in the last foregoing paragraph, the birth is registered at a United Kingdom consulate within one year of its occurrence, or, with the permission of the Secretary of State, later; or

(c) that person’s father is, at the time of the birth, in Crown service under His Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom; or

(d) that person is born in any country mentioned in subsection (3) of section one of this Act in which a citizenship law has then taken effect and does not become a citizen thereof on birth.

The man Obama claims as his father is Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., a man born in the Kenya Colony in 1936. Being born in the Kenya Colony, he was a British subject or citizen. Obama was born after the commencement of this above quoted act, ergo, Obama Jr. is a British citizen-by-descent.

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that he’d become a Citizen of Kenya in 1963
According to the Kenya Constitution (87), Obama became a Kenyan citizen in 1963, by virtue of the fact that his claimed father was born in the Kenya colony.

The Constitution of Kenya, Section 87, reads thus:

87*. Persons who became citizens on 12th December, 1963
Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on llth December, 1963, as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person, shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963:Provided that a person shall not become a citizen of Kenya by virtue of this subsection if neither of his parents was born in Kenya.
Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on llth December, 1963, as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person, shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.
Therefore Obama Jr. became a citizen of Kenya, Dec. 12, 1963, when his father did. Moreover, when his father returned to Kenya, upon graduation from Harvard, he obtained employment with the Kenyan Government as a senior Economist.

Note, that while the Kenyan constitution prohibits dual citizenship for those 21 years old or older, it does not do so for minors (cf. section 97 of the Kenyan Constitution).

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that he’d remain a British citizen-by-descent after 1963
According to the Kenya Independence Act of 1963, Obama would have retained his British citizenship status.

This is the legal conclusion of the provisions of Chapter 54, section 3 of that act of Parliament:

3.—(1) Any reference in subsection (2) or subsection (3) of this section to a colony, protectorate or protected state shall, subject to subsection (7) of this section, be construed as a reference to a territory which is a colony, protectorate or protected state (within the meaning of the British Nationality Act 1948) on the appointed day, and, accordingly, shall not include a reference to Kenya or any part thereof.

(2) Subject to subsection (6) of this section, a person shall not cease to be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies under section 2(2) of this Act if he, his father or his father’s father —

(a) was born in the United Kingdom or in a colony; or

(b) is or was a person naturalised in the United Kingdom and Colonies; or

(c) was registered as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies; or

(d) became a British subject by reason of the annexation of any territory included in a colony.

(3) A person shall not cease to be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies under section 2(2) of this Act if he was born in a protectorate or protected state, or if his father or his father’s father was so born and is or at any time was a British subject.

(4) A woman who is the wife of a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies shall not cease to be such a citizen under section 2(2) of this Act unless her husband does so.…

Since Obama’s claimed father was born in Kenya Colony, which was in 1936 part of the British Empire, and furthermore, since his father’s father, Hussein Onyango Obama was born in the British Protectorate of Kenya in 1895 (cfr. Dreams of My Father, p. 376; 425-426) , and was therefore a British Protected Person under the British Nationality and Status Act of 1914, Obama Jr retained his British citizenship status after Dec. 12, 1963.

Obama’s alleged childhood history raises the question that he was adopted by an Indonesian citizen, and therefore became an Indonesian citizen in 1966-67
According to the laws of Indonesia, in force in the 1960’s, Obama would have become a citizen of Indonesia if he was adopted by Lolo Soetero at the age of 5 or younger.

It is not yet known whether he was adopted, of if he was, in what year this may have occurred. Facts to support such an adoption are thus: an Indonesian school record which indicates that he was an Indonesian citizen, bearing the name Barry Soetero, and the Dunham-Soetero Divorce Decree of 1981, which indicates a non-minor as a child of the marriage.

That Obama goes by the name “Barry” was evidenced recently, when he called into a radio show and spoke with the outgoing Governor of Virginia. On that occasion he identified himself as “Barry from D.C..” When questioned about this phone call, the White House said that it “would not be inaccurate” to say the person calling was Barack Hussein Obama, Jr..

The Presumption is that Obama did not revoke his British Citizenship on Aug. 4, 1979
According to the British Home Office: U.K. Border Agency, to renounce British Citizenship one must be at least 18 years of age and fill out a declaration, using form RN.

Therefore, upon reaching the age of 18, on Aug. 4, 1979, Obama could have revoked his citizenship. However, the British Government has never affirmed that he has. Therefore in law we must presume that he has not, if his birth story is true.

There is ground to suppose Obama renewed his Kenyan Citizenship in 1982
The Kenyan constitution establishes that upon reaching the age of 21 years, a Kenyan citizen must renounce all other citizenships, if he wants to retain his Kenyan citizenship. There is a 2 year window in which he must make such a renunciation. In Obama’s case this window opened on Aug. 4, 1982, and closed on Aug. 4, 1984. It is known that Obama visited Kenya 2 years after his father’s death (which occurred in 1981), and thus in 1983, during this window of opportunity.

The Consequence of Obama’s alleged birth story is that in 1983, he’d become a British-overseas-citizen and remain such today

Obama acknowledges his British citizenship, by bowing to his Queen, Elizabeth II.

The British Nationality Act of 1981 changed the nomenclature for citizenship status.

The pertinent provision of that act is found in Chapter 61, Part III, and reads as follows:

PART III BRITISH OVERSEAS CITIZENSHIP

s 26 Citizens of U.K. and Colonies who are to become British Overseas citizens at commencement.

Any person who was a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies immediately before commencement and who does not at commencement become either a British citizen or a [British overseas territories citizen] [FN1] shall at commencement become a British Overseas citizen.

By “commencement”, the Act signifies Jan. 1, 1983, the date upon which it went into force.

Hence according to this Act, Obama Jr. would have gone from being classified a British citizen-by-descent, to a British Overseas Citizen.

In summary, Obama was born a British citizen-by-descent, and remains a British Overseas Citizen even today — if his birth story is true. He was also a citizen of Kenya prior to age 21, and may still be one. He seems also to have been a citizen of Indonesia from 1966-1980’s, but this is uncertain.

Editor's note:

There was another article at The Post & Email with a similar title and subject, but which I was asked to pull by its author, since the author feared being attacked by Obama supporters. I owe all the research to this author, but this article is entirely my own creation, inasmuch as I have not cited the author in anything, and wrote all the above myself, excluding the cited laws.

ILLEGAL CONGRESS--REDRESS

Illegal Congress - Redress


Don't Let Unconstitutional Legislation Be Shoved Down Your Throat ...

Thanks J.C at
http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/was-the-vote-on-healthcare-by-congressional-democrats-constitutional-i-think-not/


Was the Vote on Healthcare By Congressional Democrats Constitutional? I think not!


Senators don't have the legal right to vote YES on Obamacare because its unconstitutional- see hard evidence in my constructive notice, below. I just served this on both my Senators from The State of CA, by certified mail, to have standing to petition them for redress of grievances if they ignore said petition. You can easily do the same by going to your state constitute, copying and pasting Article I and serve it to your senators.

These people have recently demonstrated without a doubt their cluelessness and it's well past time to bring them up to speed on the Constitution in their state. So what's it going to be roll over and suck your thumb and hope this magically goes away or stand up for your rights and put your Senators under notice that they have violated their oath to defend and protect the Constitution of their state and that of the U.S.A. Random thoughts while observing the passing parade, J.C.


CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF INSTRUCTION

STATE CONSTITUTION (EXCERPT) CONSTITUTION OF CALIFORNIA

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/const-toc.html

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

SEC. 2. (a) Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or
her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of
this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or
press.
(b) A publisher, editor, reporter, or other person connected with
or employed upon a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical
publication, or by a press association or wire service, or any person
who has been so connected or employed, shall not be adjudged in
contempt by a judicial, legislative, or administrative body, or any
other body having the power to issue subpoenas, for refusing to
disclose the source of any information procured while so connected or
employed for publication in a newspaper, magazine or other
periodical publication, or for refusing to disclose any unpublished
information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving or
processing of information for communication to the public.
Nor shall a radio or television news reporter or other person
connected with or employed by a radio or television station, or any
person who has been so connected or employed, be so adjudged in
contempt for refusing to disclose the source of any information
procured while so connected or employed for news or news commentary
purposes on radio or television, or for refusing to disclose any
unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving
or processing of information for communication to the public.
As used in this subdivision, "unpublished information" includes
information not disseminated to the public by the person from whom
disclosure is sought, whether or not related information has been
disseminated and includes, but is not limited to, all notes,
outtakes, photographs, tapes or other data of whatever sort not
itself disseminated to the public through a medium of communication,
whether or not published information based upon or related to such
material has been disseminated.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

SEC. 3. (a) The people have the right to instruct their
representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and
assemble freely to consult for the common good.
(b) (1) The people have the right of access to information
concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the
meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and
agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.
(2) A statute, court rule, or other authority, including those in
effect on the effective date of this subdivision, shall be broadly
construed if it furthers the people's right of access, and narrowly
construed if it limits the right of access. A statute, court rule,
or other authority adopted after the effective date of this
subdivision that limits the right of access shall be adopted with
findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and
the need for protecting that interest.
(3) Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies the right
of privacy guaranteed by Section 1 or affects the construction of any
statute, court rule, or other authority to the extent that it
protects that right to privacy, including any statutory procedures
governing discovery or disclosure of information concerning the
official performance or professional qualifications of a peace
officer.
(4) Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies any
provision of this Constitution, including the guarantees that a
person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due
process of law, or denied equal protection of the laws, as provided
in Section 7.
(5) This subdivision does not repeal or nullify, expressly or by
implication, any constitutional or statutory exception to the right
of access to public records or meetings of public bodies that is in
effect on the effective date of this subdivision, including, but not
limited to, any statute protecting the confidentiality of law
enforcement and prosecution records.
(6) Nothing in this subdivision repeals, nullifies, supersedes, or
modifies protections for the confidentiality of proceedings and
records of the Legislature, the Members of the Legislature, and its
employees, committees, and caucuses provided by Section 7 of Article
IV, state law, or legislative rules adopted in furtherance of those
provisions; nor does it affect the scope of permitted discovery in
judicial or administrative proceedings regarding deliberations of the
Legislature, the Members of the Legislature, and its employees,
committees, and caucuses.

TO: Senators Boxer and Feinstein

Via: Registered Letter

Dear Senators:

You have just met to vote on your parties Illegal and Unconstitutional Health Care Reform Act on Monday at 1 am.

I am putting you on CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF INSTRUCTION that you do not have any LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL authority to vote yes on this issue. Therefore, your vote will be in VIOLATION of your OATH OF OFFICE and subject to removal.

Congress lacks the constitutional authority to regulate and control the practice of medicine in the jurisdiction of the States.

See Linder v. United States (caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...), 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S.Ct. 446 (1925) ("Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government");

Lambert v. Yellowly (caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...), 272 U.S. 581, 589, 47 S.Ct. 210 (1926) ("It is important also to bear in mind that 'direct control of medical practice in the States is beyond the power of the Federal Government.' Linder v. United States 268 U.S. 5, 18. Congress, therefore, cannot directly restrict the professional judgment of the physician or interfere with its free exercise in the treatment of disease. Whatever power exists in that respect belongs to the states exclusively.")

Oregon v. Ashcroff (openjurist.org...), 368 F.3d 1118, 1124 (9th Cir. 2004) ("The principle that state governments bear the primary responsibility for evaluating physician assisted suicide follows from our concept of federalism, which requires that state lawmakers, not the federal government, are 'the primary regulators of professional [medical] conduct.' Conant v. Walters, 309 F.3d 629, 639 (9th Cir. 2002);

Barsky v. Bd. of Regents (supreme.justia.com...), 347 U.S. 442, 449, 74 S.Ct 650, 98 L.ED. 829 (1954) ('It is elemental that a state has broad power to establish and enforce standards of conduct within its broders relative to the health of everyone there. It is a vital part of a state's police power.') The Attorney General 'may not...regulate [the doctor-patient] relationship to advance federal policy.' Conant, 309 F3d at 647 (Kozinski, J., concurring).")

And certain features of this proposed law will certainly be unconstitutional; see:

United States v. Constantine (supreme.justia.com...), 296, U.S. 287, 56 S.Ct. 223 (1935) "We think the suggestion has never been made -- certainly never entertained by this Court -- that the United States may impose cumulativepenalties above and beyond those specified by state law for infractions of the state's criminal code by its own citizens. The affirmative of such a proposition would obliterate the distinction between the delegated powers of the federal government and those reserved to the states and to their citizens. The implications from a decision sustaining such an imposition would be startling. The concession of such a power would open the door to unlimited regulation of matters of state concern by federal authority. The regulation of the conduct of its own citizens belongs to the state, not to the United States. The right to impose sanctions for violations of the state's laws inheres in the body of its citizens speaking through their representatives. So far as the reservations of the Tenth Amendment were qualified by the adoption of the Eighteenth, the qualification has been abolished. (emphases added)

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

Article. IV.

Section. 3.

Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, President International Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA www.iahf.com... jham@iahf.com 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World

America No LOnger A Republic

Moral Turpitude

Is there no decency among any of them? What they call a health bill is NOT A HEALTH BILL. The proper name for this heinous document is THE RIGHT TO KILL AMERICANS IN THE NEW AMERICAN DICTATORSHIP DOCUMENT!

Once again America is witnessing the silver plating of the foulest crimes against humanity born out of a cesspool of bribes, threats, intimidation, lies, lawlessness and violation of America’s contract between government and we the people—THE CONSTITUTION. These amoral kings and queens of SOPHISTRY are calling this a victory for the good of American people when the hard reality is it is an act total destruction to the morals and principles that made America great. They are telling America this is for the protection of American health when in reality it is giving them the power (not legally) to murder us in many, many ways—starting with late term abortions, rationed medical treatment to the elderly, to assisting the elderly in suicide.

When Pelosi answered the reporter who asked her where in the Constitution does it permit the forcing of a government health care plan upon the American people and she confronted the man in an arrogant tone of voice by saying twice:

“Are you serious? -------Are you serious?”

She simply mirrored the entire attitude of the existing government. They simply make up the laws as they go totally ignoring our sacred Constitution.
Our very breath and lives are now threatened. We no longer have the protection of the Constitution. They have shredded it and replaced it with unscrupulous and capricious tyranny. No longer does the finest within humanity lead the world. We are governed by the most depraved, vicious, dysfunctional and genocidal thugs that have crawled out of the sewers and under rocks the history of the world has ever seen.

This is the real reason Janet Napolitano was asked to create her Homeland Security Report. They have anticipated eventually Americans will rebel against what they are forcing upon us. With the Homeland security report, the government has created a system to legalize invading our homes without search warrants, removing any one it chooses based upon being a threat to the government, stop us in our vehicles or shoot us down in the streets if we protest to loud.

The government is still funding money to Acorn. Eric Holder still refuses to prosecute the Black Panthers who were practicing voter intimidation. The silence about Nidal Maliq Hassan’s Muslim terrorist attack on Foot Hood is so loud it is terrifying. The insistence upon bringing the 5 terrorist to New York for trial in spite of valid objections and millions of protest is appalling. The millions of pink slips America sent Washington, the repeated protests by the Tea Party people, the millions of calls and faxes sent to Washington have been totally ignored by our elected officials.

Does all this not show a pattern and a direction where this government is going? They are not listening to us. They have their own agenda. They are ignoring the Constitution which was designed to protect us from the crimes government is now committing against us. They are putting policies and laws into place for then sole purpose of total control or kill us if we revolt. They are working towards dictatorship!

We the people are now on our own without a judicial system of integrity, without a Constitution that is honored, without weapons to defend ourselves, with no sanctuary to hide any where on the planet, and soon to be looted of the last of our security, property, and valuables. We are now in a lawless land. Whatever we believed to be so in our law is no longer so. This is the true reason Barry and Evita so desperately need to get this anti humanity health care bill passed.

These are very, very dangerous times. We must take steps to protect ourselves and family. All that is left for us to do is to go under ground and develop a net work of like minded people who can be trusted if we are to survive the next decade. I because of my age will not be one of the survivors. Those who can start preparing now! We the people are crime victims of our own government.

President Obama Scares Lou Pritchet

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America ’s true living legends- an
acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world’s highest
rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize
him as the foremost leader in change management. Lou changed the way
America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to
be known as “partnering.” Pritchett rose from soap salesman to
Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and
Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.

AN OPEN LETTER TO
PRESIDENT OBAMA

Dear President Obama:
You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike
any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about
you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive
Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no
visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth
growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.
You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.
You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus
don’t understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming
others.

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned
yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to
publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail..
You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America ‘
crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style
country where the government sector dominates instead of the
private sector.

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system
with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly
capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.
You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose
that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of
living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics
against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from
challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.
You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider
opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both
omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything
you do.

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the
Limbaugh’s, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing,
conservative points of view.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.
Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will
probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

Lou Pritchett

TRUE – CHECK: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp
< http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp>
This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it.
Big surprise. Since it hit the internet, however, it has had over
500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed
is that good men do nothing.. It’s happening right now.

What is Barack Obama

Subject: Who Is Barack Obama?


This takes a few minutes to read, but you will be astounded when you see all of these facts in one document..
Please take time to read it and then pass it on..

A brilliant summation regarding the great mystery of WHO IS BARACK OBAMA?
By Joe Crews and Harvey Wysong Wednesday, July 8, 2009


Barack Obama is less of a person than an image - a brand. People see whatever they want as they do on a Rorschach test. But does anyone really know him?

In fact, he is:
An empty suit.
A man with no birth certificate.
A man who was deserted in childhood by his biological father.
A man whose birth records, both in the United States and Kenya , are sealed by government order.

A man whose childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, spied on U.S. military installations in Hawaii for the Soviet Union , edited a communist newspaper, authored pornographic novels, and wrote poetry in praise of Joseph Stalin.
A man mentored by and still supported by radical Muslims.
A man who promised transparency in government, but has spent over a million dollars in legal fees hiding information that would determine his eligibility to be President.
A man whose academic records are sealed from kindergarten through law school.
A man who arrived in New York in June of 1981 without enough money to get a hotel room, but one month later flew to Indonesia and Pakistan .
Why did he go?
Who paid his expenses?
A man who traveled to Pakistan when it was illegal for U.S. citizens to do so. So what country's passport did he use?

A man whose Law School Admission Test scores and grades at Columbia University are known to have been mediocre, but was admitted to Harvard Law School through the intervention of a Saudi named Khalid al-Mansour.
A law review editor who never published an article in any law review.
A lawyer with no significant accomplishments in the law and no reputation in the legal community.
A former State and U.S. Senator, who never authored a piece of legislation..
A disciple of the Marxist Saul Alinsky.
A product of the Chicago political machine-the most corrupt political organization in America .


A man who selects Marxists, corrupt politicians, and criminals as his close political associates and personal friends.
A man whose presidential candidacy was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America,
the Socialist International, and the Workers International League.
A man lauded for the literary brilliance of two memoirs, both of which were ghostwritten by others.
A so-called Christian who says that knowing when human life begins is "above his pay-grade," but somehow knows that abortion is permissible at any stage.

A man who thinks "waterboarding" is immoral, but that partial-birth abortion is moral.
A man who publicly laments slavery in America-which was abolished 150 years ago-but praises Islam,
which still practices both slavery and the sexual mutilation of young girls.
A man who speaks endlessly about helping the less fortunate, but gives almost none of his sizeable
income to charity-not even to his half-brother, who is living in squalor in Kenya ..
A man who had the most left-wing voting record in the United State Senate, but was predicted by the press to "govern from the middle."

A man who has never created a job, met a payroll, or even operated a lemonade stand, but wants to tell Detroit how to make cars.
A President who has never before served as an executive in either the private or the public sector.
A Commander-in-Chief who doesn't know how to shoot a rifle, throw a hand-grenade, drive a tank, fly a plane, or con a ship.
A Commander-in-Chief who has publicly divulged some of our nation's most important intelligence secrets.
A man who has been put in charge of the largest economic engine that ever existed, but has never invested in the stock market and admits total ignorance of it.
A President who says that science will guide his administration, but has no education in the sciences.


A man who is proficient in reading what is written for him on a teleprompter, but jerks and stammers
his way through any off-the-cuff speaking.
A man whose health records are sealed from childhood to the present day.
A man whose educational records are sealed from childhood through law school.


A man who spent 20 years in a church whose pastor espouses Marxist Liberation Theology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-semitism, but claims he never heard his pastor utter anti-American, and anti-Semitic statements.
A man who added more to the National Debt in 100 days than all other Presidents did in the past 220 years, yet feels qualified to lecture Americans about "fiscal responsibility".


A man who publicly expressed disdain for the U.S. Constitution on a Chicago radio station because it limited the government's ability to "redistribute wealth."
The first American President to bow before a foreign head of state-a Muslim dictator.
A man who sits and listens submissively while his country is castigated by Daniel Ortega-a Communist thug whose own daughter accused him of raping her.


A narcissist who gave the Queen of England a present from the United States --an iPod containing recordings of his own speeches.
A so-called Christian who officially declared "Pride Month" for a lifestyle that the Bible calls an abomination.
A man who wanted Americans to ignore his Muslim name during his election campaign, yet boasts of his Muslim name when he travels to Muslim countries.


A man who can name hundreds of America 's shortcomings, yet none of its great accomplishments.
A President who claims the moral high ground by closing Gitmo yet supports the transfer of terror suspects to countries where horrific torture is certain.

A President who scoffed at being called a socialist yet acted to nationalize the auto industry, the banking industry, and the insurance industry . . . and now seeks to nationalize the health care industry.
A President who violates private property rights, the sanctity of contracts, and the rule of law-three essential principles that go back over a thousand years in the Common Law tradition.
A man who promised 95% of all Americans a tax cut, but is increasing taxes on 100% of the population through inflation-the cruelest tax of all.


A lawyer who represented ACORN-an organization now indicted in several states for voter fraud-whose stated goal is to get as many people on welfare as possible in order to destroy our financial system.
A President who cheated GM's bondholders by giving their property to the UAW in a political payoff.
An American President who frequently criticizes his own country when speaking in foreign countries, but never praises America 's generosity, goodness or greatness.


A President whose Secretary of the Treasury cheated on his taxes-as did several other appointees and advisors.
A President who, despite the current federal debt of 100 trillion dollars, wants to add the greatest debt ever by nationalizing health care.
A President who scoffs at being called a socialist, yet has appointed 28 "Czars" to circumvent constitutional government, including: A "Science Czar" who has advocated compulsory abortions for American women and the "surrender of sovereignty" to a "comprehensive Planetary Regime."
A self-professed communist as his "Green Jobs Czar".
A "Pay Czar" to regulate the pay of corporate executives.
A President who swore an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic,"yet has nominated a domestic enemy of the Constitution to the Supreme Court.
A President whose Homeland Security Chief classified pro-lifers, veterans, and supporters of traditional marriage as terrorists.


A President who stood silent while the Iranian government hacked unarmed protestors to death with axes, because it was an internal matter, but freely offers his opinions about the internal affairs of Israel and Honduras .
A President who decreed that true acts of terrorism must now be described as "man-made disasters."
A President who cracks hurtful jokes about Special Olympians.
A President who refused to intercept or inspect a North Korean ship virtually certain to be carrying Weapons of Mass Destruction to Burma .


A President who wants to cancel all missile defenses while rogue nations are developing long-range ballistic missiles.
An American President who blames the violence in Mexico on America .
A Commander in Chief who claims to have been unaware that Air Force One was taken on a terrifying, low-level photo-op over Manhattan


A President who berates American CEO's for flying in private planes at private expense on company business, but whose wife spends hundreds of housands tax payer dollars flying to Paris for a shopping spree.
A President who promised a transparent administration, but requires all questions be screened before "impromptu" appearances.
A man who freely admitted that his energy policies are designed to bankrupt the American coal industry.

A President who has presided over the loss of 14.7 million jobs and whose "energy policy" will cause the loss of another 1 million jobs.
A President whose "energy policy" will increase the average American's utility bills by over $2,000 a year in the middle of the Great Recession.
A man about whom liberal journalist Tom Brokaw said, "There's a lot about him we don't know," just one week before the election.


The vast majority of Americans do not know who he is, but someone surely does. Someone paid for his travel expenses to Pakistan and Indonesia . Someone engineered legal challenges to all of his election opponents for the State Senate and had them disqualified. Someone straightened and leveled his path to the U.S. Senate when a Democrat Judge made public the child custody records of his Republican opponent. When he was a candidate for the U.S. Senate, someone arranged for him to speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Someone saw to it that all of his records were sealed, both at home and abroad. Someone assembled the massive organization for his run for the Presidency. Someone knows all about him.

Who?

Become an Under Ground Pupblisher

BECOME AN UNDER GROUND PUBLISHER

SPREAD THE WORD

It has been my repeated experience to discover that nearly every person I have inter acted with in commerce and socially have no idea that Obama is being challenged in American courts and elsewhere to produce his legal records to prove he is eligible to be our president. In fact in a recent AOL survey 67% of the people believe Obama is qualified under the Constitution to be president.

The really big lesson we learned since Obama’s campaign is that main stream and Fox media are definitely suppressing vital information needed by the American public in order to make the right voting and other survival decisions. Those of us fortunate enough to be connected to the inter net are able to research and get vital news facts that a large percentage of the American public does not. We need to become a beacon of truth and facts for the benefit of our country.

It is vital to the restoration of America that the facts regarding the history and actions of this current government be revealed to a far larger number of the American public than to just we the inter net members. There will be minimum to no restoration of America until at least 70% of America’s population agrees it is necessary to restore America now, by challenging the legitimacy of the current government; the integrity of congress and Senate and ethics of the judicial system.

It is obvious we need to begin our own information net work to get facts to all of America. We need our own news paper—with or without advertisers. We need our own system of distribution. We need our own TV news network. Obviously, it will take time, money, and experienced, ethical people in these various media to get it started and keep it running. There is no time to wait for it to happen. We need it last year—during the 2008 campaign. So how do we do it with what we have got? Let us each become anonymous underground publishers and distributors of this information in our daily life.

What if each and every blogger, poster, and website owner printed just one factual article relating to any one of the law suits—past or present challenging Obama to produce his sealed records and left copies wherever he/she goes—doctor’s office, super market, restaurants, hardware stores, back of the church, gym, and so on.

Put one simple head line on it. Suggestions to name the paper:
Your own ideas are probably superior to the following:

WHAT THE MEDIA DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW?

LOOK WHAT MEDIA HAS NOT TOLD YOU. . .

THE TRUTH HAS GONE UNDERGROUND

YOUR LIFE AND YOUR FAMILY’S LIFE DEPEND UPON THE TRUTH


1.Find a very well written article about the challenge of Obama’s eligibility you think sums up the issue best,
2.Ask permission of the writer or web site to print it Most of them would be glad to give you permission as it would help drive traffic to their web sites.
3.You could use an actual court filed document—that is public record and it gives absolute authenticity and can be easily validated because of the court filing numbers on it

4.Print it and make 100 or more copies—depending on you time, money, & energy

5.Take them with you everywhere you go, leave whatever number of copies at each place

You can choose to do this anonymously—like an under ground newspaper. You could decide to leave contact information. You could develop the newsletter into an opportunity to sell ads or you could simply just continue to get out the message. Any way you choose, the most important action is to continue brining the information the media refuses to publish and let anyone and every one know the TRUTH AND FACTS.

There are 300,000,000+ Americans who must learn truth from the sophistry heaped upon America, today. If there are at least 100,000 bloggers who start publishing one article a week and print only 100 and leave them wherever they go, that will reach 1,000,000. That 1,000,000 reach 2,000,000 and soon it will catch on.

There are many sources to find these articles—Orly Taitz has published all her filed briefs. Mario Puzzo, Phil Berg, Leo Donofrio, and other also have filed briefs in the courts—all of those are available to the public. The Heritage Foundation, The Oath Keepers, Citizenwells, The Right Side of America, We The People Foundation, The jag hunter, WND and so on are all excellent sources of material on this subject. With their permission—let’s get the word out to the others who—for whatever reason—are still in the dark. Wouldn’t this take away the thunder of those who choose to denigrate the just Americans for daring to challenge Obama’s legitimacy?

JBJD says: “. . . why not copy and distributed Attorney Bob Bauer’s footnote in Hollister? Or copies of requests to NP and Alice Germond to provide the documentation on which they based their Certification BO was qualified, along with the responses showing they refused to answer the question?

(And why would anyone who ostensibly wants to ‘out’ BO omit the work posted on my blog from a campaign purportedly aimed at revealing the truth?)”

Portuguese Revolutionary War Hero - Peter Francisco says:

“Great advice which I have mentioned many times.
Spread the word especially bring more and more people to this blog and others, so every piece of info you put out there ALWAYS include this blog address or others. Leave it in bathrooms, bulletin boards, bus stops, trains, etc.
Also tell all your friends and family that the Fraud of ACORN, Global Warming, John Edwards and Tiger Woods affairs were all DENIED but the Truth Prevailed the Truth of Obama Eligibility May also be a Massive Cover-Up because where there has been smoke we found fire. Someone that is a man of Transparency would not hire high price lawyers and Spend over 2 Million dollars fighting close to 100 lawsuits in courts to keep his Identity Secret and his Great School records SEALED. Only a FRAUD would work this hard to Fool We The People.

Instead of ridiculing those that question it like, Dobbs, Dr. Orly Taitz, and many other Patriots and Now Sarah Palin WHY NOT PROVE US ALL WRONG and show the Documents?
We will Prevail to find the Truth about Obama’s FRAUD just like we did with the other cases above, I only hope it won’t take long for the sake of the Constitution and our American Way.

Truth will Prevail.
God Bless US
Submitted by usapatriots-shout.blogspot.com