Obamas arrested

Obamas arrested
Pray for the day!

Senate Refused to Vet Obama

We're Never Gonna Stand For This

Freedom of Speech Will No Longer Be Possible

The original Kenyan birth certificate of Obama

Dog Day Afternoon

Is it here, yet?

This is an American Tradition That Has Always Been Valuable to Us

To Arrest Obama or Force America to Live Enslaved?

Obama is a Muslim

Restore America

There's a Communist Living in the white House

Dr. Taitz on Obama

The Enemy is Obama

How to Become an Underground Publisher and help take back America


There you will find directions and suggested material and web sites to check to find other material. You are welcome to take material from this site, the info service site, or just find your own. Whatever please commit to spread the word.

Join us at http://blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots every Monday 3:30 p.m. pactific standard time


Lakin Defense Options !!!


The Stand Up America BlogSTAND UP AMERICA EXCLUSIVE – Lakin Defense OptionsPublished on 09/03/10

Editor’s Note: The following report is solely the product of the authors and is posted here for the public to view, and discern for themselves. It is a scholarly work and may clear up many questions readers may have.

Courts Martial Defense For LTC Terrence LakinBy J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington

World Net Daily, which has been following the Lakin trial step-by-step from the beginning, is reporting:

FT. MEADE, Md. – A career officer in the U.S. Army [Col. Denise R. Lind] acting as a judge in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin today ruled that the military is no place for Barak Obama’s presidential eligibility to be evaluated.
According to the WND report, presiding authority Col. Denise R. Lind used the following arguments to deny LTC Lakin proper access to a defense, summarized in the following three paragraphs taken from the 40 minute long reading of her decision Army Col. Denise R. Lind today ruled in a hearing regarding the evidence to be allowed in the scheduled October court-martial of Lakin that he will be denied access to any of Obama’s records as well as any testimony from those who may have access to the records.

With her decision, Lind mirrored a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs’ access to any requested documentation regarding the president’s eligibility.
Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.

We find foundational flaws in Col. Lind’s decision, which Lakin’s defense team must seize upon in order to alter the current course of this trial.

1 – Lind’s authority is derived from the same place as LTC Lakin’s and all other members of the United States Military – from the supreme command of the office of Commander-in-Chief, the President of the United States.

2 – Lind is attempting to use her authority under her Commander-in-Chief to break the military chain of command, isolating the Commander-in-Chief of the US Military specifically, exempting the President from his position of authority in the chain of command, without which, Lind herself has no authority to convene the Courts Martial.

3 – Lind then reaches outside of the US Military Justice system to the Civil Court, relying upon civil court precedent to deny Lakin any access to discovery and thereby, a proper defense guaranteed him by the US Constitution and UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice. Civil Court precedent has no legal standing in a UCMJ criminal proceeding. In fact, the UCMJ is based upon the Articles of War (aka War Articles) and is a “penal system” unlike the US Justice System – as explained by Col. William Winthrop in Military Law and Precedents. As a result, precedents set in courts outside of the UCMJ are without legal standing in any UCMJ proceeding.

4 – Not even in the UCMJ can the United States government deny the accused his/her right to a trial, complete with discovery of related evidence. Yet Lind attempts to do so, under the authority derived from her Commander-in-Chief. If the chain of command is broken, then Lind herself has no authority.

5 – Lind’s statement that the legality of the Commander-in-Chief is “not relevant” in matters of military command is false on its face. As stated in a sworn affidavit filed by LTG Thomas G. McInerney executed on August 20, 2010 – “In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. – By thus stepping up to the bar, LTC Lakin is demonstrating the courage of his convictions and his bravery. – That said, it is equally essential that he be allowed access to the evidence that will prove whether he made the correct decision.”

6 – Lind attempts to break the chain of command at The Pentagon level, which she claims has no issue with the current Commander-in-Chief and that this should be good enough for Lakin. Yet she cannot break this chain of command without eliminating her own authority, and Lakin’s oath requires that he decide for himself whether or not his orders are legal, as affirmed in LTG McInerney’s sworn affidavit.

7 – At issue is not whether or not LTC Lakin refused orders, but rather whether or not he “unlawfully” refused orders. If his orders were not “lawful,” including but not limited to, emanating from a “lawful” chain of command which begins with a lawful Commander-in-Chief, then Lakin must be found NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.
At the heart of the matter is whether or not his orders to deploy were “lawful.” LTC Lakin has questioned whether or not his deployment orders were “lawful” on the basis that he believes that the Commander-in-Chief from which those orders are issued, may not be “lawful,” therefore making any orders from the top of military command “unlawful.”
To determine whether or not Lakin is correct in his decision to refuse orders, it is paramount to discover with certainty whether or not his orders were issued by a “lawful” command.
As we know, Article II – Section I requires that only a “natural born citizen” of the United States can hold the office of President, Commander-in-Chief. In this regard, a fatal misstep in the Lakin defense has opened the door for the illegitimate statements now being made by Col. Denise R. Lind.

LTC Lakin failed to directly assert that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT legal in his command on the basis that we know with certainty that he is not a “natural born citizen,” – and that LTC Lakin is “lawfully” refusing to follow orders on this basis. Instead, LTC Lakin only asked the “birth place” question and tied that question to whether or not Mr. Obama could and would present an official “birth certificate” proving once and for all that he was indeed born in Hawaii, making the wrong assumption that if he could and would provide proof of said birth via an official birth certificate, which has never been released to date.

The fatal error revolves around the reality that Obama’s birth place is of no consequence in the matter of his status as a “natural born citizen” eligible for high Command of the US Military under Article II – Section I of the Constitution. Although there is no shortage of opinions on the subject of what the term “natural born citizen” means, there is no honest debate on the matter either.

Every Supreme Court Justice knows exactly what the term “natural born citizen” means, where it came from, why it exists in Article II requirements for the office of President and that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a “natural born citizen,” indeed ineligible for the office he currently holds.

They know that LTC Lakin is right to “lawfully” refuse orders from an illegal Command.

We know this on the basis of the following critical facts:

1 – The term “natural born citizen” is derived from the Law of Nations. An international treaty establishing a set of rules used to establish a “nation,” the issue of nation and citizen sovereignty, and internationally recognized definitions of universal terms, including the term “natural born citizen.”

2 – The Law of Nations is specifically mentioned in the US Constitution as an enumerated power of Congress under Article I – Section VIII – Item X – “To define and punish offenses against the Law of Nations;” (Note that in the original Constitution, Law of Nations is capitalized, referring specifically to THE Law of Nations.)

3 – From Emerich de Vattel’s 1758 book on The Law of Nations, Chapter 19 § 212. – Of the citizens and natives – Vattel establishes – “in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

4 – In a letter from Founder John Jay to then President of the Constitutional Convention George Washington, Jay stated – “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

5 – It was later learned that President George Washington had actually taken out Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations from the local library in order to study proper implementation of law in our newly formed nation, and never returned that book. On the basis of known history and facts behind the Constitutional term “natural born citizen” which is based upon “natural law” explained in the Law of Nations as stated referred to in the US Constitution, the proper assertion is not at all related to the actual “birth place” of Barack Hussein Obama, II. The ongoing search for a Hawaiian birth certificate has no bearing on the subject of “natural born citizen” status for Barack Hussein Obama, II.

The only relative question is:

Was Barack Hussein Obama’s birth father a legal citizen of the United States of America at the time of his birth, no matter where in the world he may have been born? Without a birth father who was a legal citizen of the United States at the time of his birth, Barack Hussein Obama, II cannot be a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, he is not without divided national loyalties, and cannot serve as President of the United States or Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military as a result, creating a national security and a full blown Constitutional crisis.

According to the two autobiographical books by Barack Hussein Obama, II – his birth father is Barack Hussein Obama, a British subject at the time and a legal citizen of Kenya. According to public family history, Barack Hussein Obama was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States.

On this basis alone, LTC Lakin is right (and lawful) in refusing to accept orders from an illegal command. The US Constitution and the Law of Nations, upon which our sovereign nation was formed, are very clear on the matter.

As a result, the need for LTC Lakin to gain access to the Hawaiian birth records for Barack Hussein Obama, II is eliminated.

LTC Lakin need only assert the following:

On the basis of Article II – Section I of the US Constitution, supported by Article I – Section VIII – Item X concerning the Law of Nations and the term “natural born citizen,” – I hereby refuse any and all illegal orders issued by the illegal Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military, President Barack Hussein Obama, on the basis that he does not meet Constitutional requirements for the office he currently holds and must further hereby demand that he be removed from office and immediately relieved of Command of the United States Military. I further assert that due to the illegal status of existing Military high Command that this Court Martial has no authority under which to proceed.

Under this assertion, there is no need for access to the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama, II, unless Mr. Obama chooses to respond by stating that Barack Hussein Obama is not his real birth father, in which case Mr. Obama is admitting to fraud during his pursuit of the Oval Office.
In the event that the UCMJ chooses to challenge the historically accurate definition of the term “natural born citizen” described herein, the US Supreme Court is the only court in the land with proper authority to rule on the true meaning of the term “natural born citizen” – as stated by the Constitutional protections that LTC Lakin has sworn a lifetime to protect and defend.

With this assertion is place, LTC Lakin does not have to prove that his assertions are true and accurate. As Commander-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama must prove that Lakin’s assertion is false in order to proceed with the government prosecution of LTC Lakin on the grounds that he has “unlawfully” refused orders.

In short, Mr. Obama must prove that his orders are in fact “lawful.” If Obama is either unable or unwilling to do so, then LTC Lakin is in fact NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.

This particular case is not about one soldier refusing deployment orders. It is about a nation allowing a precedent to stand which makes it possible for any individual with any foreign allegiance to hold the highest office in this land, with no obligation whatsoever to demonstrate or prove national loyalties before holding the office of President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.

This case is about whether or not the US Constitution stands as the official Law of this land.

NOTE: Past challenges on the term “natural born citizen” have been improperly argued upon cases revolving around the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment relates to “immigration” and “naturalization” laws, not “natural law” used to establish “natural born citizenship” status of an individual. Therefore, any and all cases pertaining to Fourteenth Amendment arguments are moot on the matter of “natural born citizen” claims.

Researched and Prepared By:
J.B. Williams and Timothy Harrington
The United States Patriots Union, LLC - Sheridan, Wyoming
Available pdf - Courts Martial Defense of LTC Terrance Lakin.pdf (399kb - 5 pgs)

Researched and Reviewed By:
The United States Bar Association


Rise Up ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwvuimX2bjIStand Up ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Het3H9iQIAir America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dnq8o_7hPccI Am America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2CzerawWho We Are - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHtVxDz43KY Come to Jesus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs10Rr14WxYWe The People - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJEAmerica Rising - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=662R2awSwPQI Fought For You - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTb6qdPu8JEChicago Tea Party - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8kChildren of Liberty - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWnrt0ZLKQIU.S. Cease to Exist - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6p3l8BXmhsGod Save Arizona ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrA07jcIHZIGod Bless Arizona ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKFuYykPSxIAwaken O, America - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fzKY0hS_PwRun Into The Conflict - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6lWl_XzKAMuslim Demographics - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYUThree Things About Islam - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6wU.S. has 2 Constitutions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0These are the Oath Keepers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf2K4-BQYAIStop The Socialist Revolution ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtjQzpfq9-UThe Hidden Covenant Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnO-x9hkpX4The Hidden Covenant Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI92qto8gYsOB Mocks, Attacks Jesus, Bible - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi-V_ilJu0wObama Admits He Is A Muslim - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzYSecond American Revolution - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDkWeThePeople Stimulus Package - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyAThe Year of Living Dangerously - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsBOxDM_VekGOD'S JUDGMENT ON AMERICA - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW6roFN7NAENWO Plans 3 World Wars from 1871 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0DIQgnNRY49/11 NWO - Eu USA vs Russia China - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhvfCFCfdNkToo Late to Apologize: A Declaration - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZfRaWAtBVgOur Lives, Fortunes, Sacred Honor 2010 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL5bPJFHRnA

Esoteric Agenda - http://blip.tv/search?q=esoteric+agendaCamp FEMA: American Lockdown (1:26:41) - http://blip.tv/file/3661748Don't Tread On Me: Rise of the Republic (1:35:45) - http://blip.tv/file/3644422/Meltup - InflationUS (54:37) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1n1X0OqdwFall of the Republic HQ (2:24:18) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shUThe Obama Deception HQ (1:53:40) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLwLOOSE CHANGE ! Full Version HD - 9/11 Absolute Truth - http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cnhf29Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA HQ (2:20:38) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klqv9t1zVwwInvisible Empire - NWO Defined HQ (2:14:01) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5ENorman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations (52:24) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHMAmerica: Freedom to Fascism (1:51:16) - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173The Fourth Kind Encounters (1:38) - http://sureynot.com/v/1278/the-fourth-kind,-true-story-with-raw-footage.html

Shadow Government - Grant Jeffrey (4 parts)Pt 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td01pNoC8icPt 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8UlFZZwG3EPt 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsHXb74M3JkPt 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Du7SiYLa90

The United American Freedom Foundation - http://uaff.info/2010 Sex, Drugs & Religion (1:11:14) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1021806902010 Global Eugenics - Using Medicine To Kill (2:04:57) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1007205722010 The American Matrix - Age Of Deception (2:00:03) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1007198422008 The Decline And Fall Of America - The Movie (2:00:46) http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=63997187

Twenty Ten - 2010 by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZkvkLmkYVgNBRA Feet to the Fire by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s8BGPy7_MULloyd Marcus - American Tea Party Anthem - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1byTDgu7iAWE THE PEOPLE, New Tea Party Unity Song by Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlkgFpU_FB4Confessions of a Black Conservative - http://www.lloydmarcus.com/?page_id=1029Lloyd Marcus - http://www.youtube.com/user/LloydMarcusUSAhttp://www.lloydmarcus.com

Victory over All Creationhttp://downloads.cbn.com/cbnplayer/cbnPlayer.swf?s=/vod/MW131v2_WS

Run Into The Conflict - "Run For Your Life" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6lWl_XzKA On the first Sunday following the tragedy of September 11th, 2001, Carter Conlon delivered this soul-stirring message at Times Square Church in Manhattan. The sermon was titled, "Run For Your Life" and it is certainly worth the effort to listen to it in its entirety. http://www.braveheartedgospel.com/Sermons.html

U.S. HISTORY REPETITIVE TO END TIMEI - Bondage to Spiritual Faith - Year of The MayflowerII - From Spiritual Faith to great Courage - 1776III - From Courage to Liberty - Constitution 1791IV - From Liberty to Abundance - 1900 to 1960V - From Abundance to Complacency - 1960 to 1980VI - From Complacency to Apathy - 1980 to 2000VII - From Apathy to Dependence - 2000 to 2009 VIII - From Dependence back into Bondage by CONTRIVANCEIX - From Bondage to Spiritual Faith - 2010 to ? by REVIVAL or DEMISE - WWIIIX - RAPTURE - Blessed Assurance has Come - NEW JERUSALEM

Antichrist Illuminati Obama New World Order Agenda 2012 Exposedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjCiz47_PTY

The Prophecies and Revelations of Saint Bridget (Birgitta) of Swedenhttp://www.saintbirgitta.com/

Yahuwah - Yahushuahttp://followersofyah.com/

Listen to the discussion--lessons learned in 2009--1/18/2010

The facts about the health care bill!

We're The Government and You're Not

Stand up for America

keep the fire burning

keep the fire burning
Keeping alive the burning desire for freedom

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Obama’s Incurable Nausea

Joan Swirsky Bio
Email Article

By Joan Swirsky Sunday, April 12, 2009
In the panoply of human ailments, few compare to chronic nausea, the overwhelmingly sickening feeling that you’re going to throw up at any minute. So revolting is this gagging-in-the-throat feeling that anything associated with it – a hamburger, a chicken dish, or even yogurt that made you sick – is enough for anyone to forswear this-or-that food forever. Memories of the hot sweats, the bile in the esophagus, the retching into the toilet, and then the clean-up are etched into one’s consciousness forever. Added to the horror is the impossibility of staving off the inevitable outcome. Deep breaths, a cold washcloth on the forehead, even anti-nausea medication don’t help. There is something bad going on inside – something toxic –and it’s got to come out…it’s got to be thrown up.

For the past several decades, it is clear that the Left has suffered from this malady – this chronic unrelenting nausea – that seems only to be relieved by their periodic explosions of verbal vomit.

What is making them so sick? What exactly can’t they stomach? In a word, America!

Who can forget the noxious regurgitation leveled at our country and our last president – during a time of war and on foreign soil – by former presidents Jimmy (Mr. Misery Index) Carter and Bill Clinton, or Sen. Dick Durbin’s vile comparison of the guards at Gitmo to “Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime – Pol Pot or others…”?

But these pale in comparison to President Obama’s groveling apologies and egregious insults to America on his recent trip abroad, starting with his telling a French audience: “In America, there is a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world…there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”

Why do Leftists behave like this? Why do they condemn and insult and apologize for our great nation to foreigners who have always envied and resented us?

Because they hate us too! These are the ingrates who don’t deserve the privilege of having been being born in America – and I wish they hadn’t been! What I wish is that they’d been born in Communist Russia or Cuba, in Socialist Venezuela or Europe, or in Jihad-Central Saudi Arabia or Syria, where they’d have fit right in to the totalitarian regimes they unfailingly glamorize.

But the unlucky citizens of our country are stuck with this bash-America crowd and with their jihad against our exquisite Constitution, our envy-of-the world free-market capitalist system, our bountiful generosity, and the foundation of morality and lawfulness – based on Judeo-Christian ethics – that has guided our nation for over 230 years.

Calling Obama’s apologia “unforgiveable,” the publisher of www.conservativetruth.org Tom Barrett notes: “It seems that Obama has devised a strategy to deal with those who continually criticize the United States. He’s doing it for them…he’s the same anti-American internationalist that he’s always been. He was just doing what came naturally. It was frankly embarrassing. He even made liberals like Clinton and Carter look like patriots. Obama has always admired everything European, and he praised his fawning audiences lavishly. But when he deigned to mention the country he supposedly represents, it was to criticize her or apologize for her.”

Or as Don Surber writes: “What the devil was he talking about?

Is he ashamed at our arrogance in 1917 to side with France and Great Britain in World War I?
Is he ashamed at our arrogance in supplying the war materiel needed to save France again in World War II?
Is he ashamed at our arrogance in winning back the entire European continent one square inch at a time beginning at Normandy?
Is he ashamed at our arrogance in flying, ceaselessly, supplies to Berlin when the Soviets cut off the roads in 1948?
Is he ashamed at our arrogance in sparing South Korea from being run over by the Chinese in 1950?
Is he ashamed at our arrogance in defending Europe from the Soviet threat, sheltering vanquished Germany from our ally in World War II?
“The only thing that President Obama should be ashamed of,” Surber continues, “is President Franklin Roosevelt’s refusal in May 1939 to extend political asylum to the Jewish refugees aboard the transatlantic ocean liner St. Louis. This administration should not apologize for the strength shown by previous presidents. They shouldered their responsibilities and maintained the capacity to save hundreds of millions of people. It remains to be seen whether the Obama administration can do as well.”

As Obama was lavishing praise on the Europeans and betraying his startling ignorance of American history, best-selling author and radio-host Mark Levin was reminding his listeners that Europe has indeed led the world – in Colonialism, Imperialism, Communism, Fascism and Nazism – movements that were all born in Europe and metastasized from there like the cancers they are.

Columnist Charles Krauthammer also reminds the president that, “Europe has been sucking on America’s teat for 60 years – parasitically. In order to attain the adoration of the crowds [Obama] denigrated his country in a way that I think is disgraceful.”

And writer Raymond S. Kraft weighs in with the kind of nettling facts that make Leftists like Obama so incurably nauseated: “In little more than two centuries, despite its faults, America has offered more freedom, more opportunity, and more prosperity to more people than any other nation in history. And America has spent more of its money and blood to liberate other peoples from tyranny and totalitarianism than all other nations in history combined.”

Why did President Obama smile his way through Europe? That’s what people do after their nausea has abated, after they’ve finally thrown up. Think about it, in just eight short days, Obama:

Declined President Sarkozy’s invitation to visit the cemetery in Normandy to honor the fallen American heroes who liberated Europe His flimsy excuse: it might offend the Germans! But that didn’t stop him from accepting an invitation to visit a mosque in Istanbul. No nausea here, as he threw up on America.
Told the G20 members he favored Turkey becoming a member of the European Union. No nausea here as he threw up on the “West’s” years-long resistance to this idea.
Began the turnover of U.S. sovereignty in which all U.S. regulatory bodies and companies will be placed under international regulation, which, as writer Sher Zieve has documented, “will of course override the US Constitution.” No nausea here as the vomiting on America continued.
Announced the reduction in U.S. nuclear weaponry so that, as Zieve says, “the U.S. is no longer a threat to anyone – let alone terrorists. Never before…has a leader announced – in no uncertain terms – that it is his plan and duty to dismantle and destroy the country he represents.” Definitely no nausea here as his purging brought more and more relief.
Bowed deeply to Saudi Arabian King Abdullah, alluded to his Muslim ties, and said that America had been “shaped” by Islam. No nausea here as he showed unseemly – and unprecedented – obeisance to a foreign power and threw up on America’s Judeo-Christian heritage, which he trumped by telling an audience in Turkey that America is not a Christian nation. As one blogger said: Submission Accomplished!
“Unless he considers himself an Indonesian,” writes scholar Robert Spencer, “Obama’s statement was extraordinarily strange.” Spencer enumerates the multiple ways in which Islam has not “shaped” America:

No Muslims along Paul Revere’s ride.
No Muslims standing next to Patrick Henry when he proclaimed, “Give me liberty or give me death”?
No Muslims among the framers or signers of the Declaration of Independence.
No Muslims among those who drafted the Constitution [and ] enumerated the Bill of Rights.
No Muslims played a role in the great struggle over slavery that defined so much of our contemporary understandings of the nature of this republic and of the rights of the individual within it.
No Muslims shaped the way the U.S. responded to the titanic challenges of the two World Wars, the Great Depression, or the Cold War.
No Muslims of the Islamic faith – which institutionalizes discrimination against non-Muslims – who shaped the civil rights movement in the U.S.
“So in what way has the Islamic faith shaped Obama’s country?” Spencer asks. “The most significant event connected to the Islamic faith that has shaped the character of the U.S. was the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001…Of course, it is certain that Obama had none of that in mind. But what could he possibly have had in mind? His statement was either careless or ignorant, or both – not qualities we need in a Commander-in-Chief even in the best of times.”

Writer Diana West goes further.

King Abdullah, after all, is the head of a state that is the very caricature of modern-day evil, a Sharia dictatorship that fosters religious repression, de facto slavery, subjugation of women, and, not least, the international export of jihad and Sharia through “charities,” mosques, madrassas, textbooks, university endowments, Sharia finance and, of course, terrorists, some 15 of whom attacked the United States in 2001.

Just last month, Abdullah elevated the delusionally hard-line interior minister Prince Nayef, who long promoted the crackpot theory that Saudis were not involved in 9/11 (it was the Jews, he said), to a direct line of succession to the Saudi throne. Abdullah himself has donated at least $1.35 million to Saudi telethons that raised $174 million for the families of Palestinian suicide bombers from Hamas and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. In 2007, Abdullah explicitly denounced the U.S. presence in Iraq as “illegitimate,” thus encouraging attacks on Americans in Iraq, where, not incidentally, Saudis are thought to have carried out more suicide bombings than any other nationality.

That’s just for starters. In other words, this is not a personage an American president can ever, ever show deference to without besmirching the memories and lives of the American dead and maimed.

And, as James Lewis asks in The American Thinker, “What kind of man has such an obsessive need to put down his own country?”

While the president, Krauthammer says, was “bearing a basketful of mea culpas” and “indicting his own people for arrogance, for dismissiveness and derisiveness, for genocide, for torture, for Hiroshima, for Guantanamo and for insufficient respect for the Muslim world, what did he get for this obsessive denigration of his own country?

He wanted more NATO combat troops in Afghanistan…he was rudely rebuffed.
He wanted more stimulus spending from Europe…he got nothing.
From Russia, he got no help on Iran.
From China, he got the blocking of any action on North Korea.”
He also wanted European countries to take the Gitmo terrorists off his hands, but Austria said no thanks and France said they’d take only one!

And just as North Korea was launching its missile, the president told an audience in Prague that he wanted a nuclear-weapons-free world. “Now is the time for a strong international response,” he exhorted them, which he also didn’t get, as the feckless and ineffectual do-nothings at the United Nations did nothing – “no sanctions. No resolution. Not even a statement,” Krauthammer reports.

“It is passing strange,” Krauthammer says, “for a world leader to celebrate his own country’s decline.”

UK writer and broadcaster Gerald Warner is not so polite. Calling Obama a President Pantywaist - the new surrender monkey on the block, Warner says the president’s foreign adventure was “the most successful foreign policy tour since Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow. You name it, he blew it.”

Commenting on Kim Il Jong’s missile launch, Warner says that “President Pantywaist is hopping mad and he has a strategy to cut Kim down to size: he is going to slice $1.4 billion off America’s missile defense program, presumably on the calculation that Kim would feel it unsporting to hit a sitting duck, so that will spoil his fun. Watch out, France and Co, there is a new surrender monkey on the block and, over the next four years, he will spectacularly sell out the interests of the West with every kind of liberal-delusionist initiative on nuclear disarmament and sitting down to negotiate with any power freak who wants to buy time to get a good ICBM fix on San Francisco, or wherever.”

Weakening our national defense, of course, is among President Obama’s chief goals. As writer Caroline Glick has noted, “somewhere between apologizing for American history - both distant and recent; genuflecting before the unelected, bigoted king of Saudi Arabia; announcing that he will slash the US’s nuclear arsenal, scrap much of America’s missile defense programs and emasculate the US Navy; leaving Japan to face North Korea and China alone; telling the Czechs, Poles and their fellow former Soviet colonies, `Don’t worry, be happy,’ as he leaves them to Moscow’s tender mercies; humiliating Iraq’s leaders while kowtowing to Iran; preparing for an open confrontation with Israel; and thanking Islam for its great contribution to American history, President Obama made clear to the world’s aggressors that America will not be confronting them for the foreseeable future… none of them has any reason to fear Washington.”

But, Glick adds that after Obama’s European trip, “America’s most stable allies worldwide began a desperate search for a reset button that would cause the administration to take back its abandonment of America’s role as the protector of the free world” – including Japan, India, Iraq, Europe, Czechoslovakia, the Ukranian governments, and of course Israel.

“America’s betrayal of its democratic allies,” Glick says, “makes each of them more vulnerable to aggression at the hands of their enemies - enemies the Obama administration is now actively attempting to appease.” But Glick didn’t include our important ally Canada, which has also criticized American foreign policy, but whose citizens are now gravely concerned about America’s defensive umbrella under which they’ve lived in security since the end of World War II.

Relieved temporarily from his chronic condition – nausea brought on by antipathy to America – President Obama returned to the U.S. to face yet another of the irritating “distractions” that threaten to sidetrack his single-minded pursuit of destroying our country. Last Wednesday, a small band of Somali Muslim terrorists attacked an American cargo ship, the Maersk Alabama, for the purpose of kidnapping its sailors and extorting millions of dollars for their return. The ship’s heroic captain, Richard Phillips, offered himself as hostage and the ship, filled with humanitarian aid, was able to proceed on its way to Kenya.
Captain Phillips was whisked into a small covered boat that ran out of fuel, leaving it to float aimlessly in the Indian Ocean. He dove overboard trying to escape, but was recaptured by the terrorists and to this moment we don’t know if he’s had a glass of water or is being starved or will live to see his family or serve his country again.

The crew of the Maersk Alabama had taken hostage one of the terrorists and agreed to exchange him for Captain Phillips. The Americans met the bargain but the terrorists reneged. At the time, an American warship, the USS Bainbridge, was close by, and was then joined by three more U.S. warships and six U.S. naval vessels.

At the same time, African Muslim terrorists took three Frenchmen hostage. In short order, the French fought back fiercely and rescued them.

Dan Friedman, a frequent commentator on the political scene, said: “when the French show you up, you’ve sunk very low. When you’re outsmarted and outmaneuvered by a band of illiterate savages, you’ve neared rock bottom. When four kids with rotting teeth who’ve never seen a flush toilet can stop you in your tracks, you’re foundering. When your sophisticated Navy and your will to use it is defeated by your own Commander-in-Chief’s naiveté and cringing self-doubt, your country is up a creek without a paddle.”

In perfect keeping with President Obama’s abject pandering to the Muslim world and his by-now-proven “style” of appeasement and capitulation (read North Korea, Iran and Captain Phillips), what have we heard from him?

On day one of the crisis: “We’re talking about housing, guys,” he shot back at a journalist who dared question him about the Somali terrorist attack and Captain Phillips’ plight.

On day two: Silence.

On day three: Deafening silence.

On day four: Thundering silence.

Responding quickly to their new ally in the White House, Somali Muslim terrorists promptly hijacked an American-owned, 16-crew-member tugboat in the Gulf of Aden. President Obama’s response: “Absent.”

As editor Charlotte Baker says; “In less than 90 days, President Obama has pushed America back to the malaise of the Carter days – hostages and all.”

James Lewis writes that, “Jimmy and Zbig (Brezenski) have been trying to explain their disastrous ignorance ever since and because they are mentally stuck in appeasement they have infected the Obamanites with the same bacilli. If Obama fails to take action, watch for Russia to make a move on the Ukraine. China will get more aggressive toward Taiwan. Iran will openly throw sandals at Obama effigies, and the rest of the world will realize— uh oh, no more cop on the international beat. North Korea will launch another missile over Japan…another satellite launch will somehow go astray, heading toward Hawaii…welcome to the age of American weakness.”

No problem, our president seems to be saying. Just as he chortled his way through an interview with “60 Minutes’” Steve Kroft about our devolving economic situation – prompting the horrified reporter to ask, “Are your punch drunk?” – his mood remains good. So good that during this horrific siege – while the life of Captain Richard Phillips hangs in the balance – he decided to fly a St. Louis chef 860 miles to whip up some gourmet pizza in the White House. And his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, apparently thought Captain Phillips’s imperiled life and the entire hostage scene was hysterically funny, as she weirdly cackled her way through a press conference about it.

Easy to explain. As long as America is in trouble, Obama and his America-loathing co-conspirators are free of their incurable nausea. That intractable condition will only be cured when America is completely and utterly destroyed.

(4) Reader Feedback | Subscribe

Joan Swirsky Most recent columns
Joan Swirsky is an award winning author and journalist. Her work can be found at joanswirsky.com

Joan can be reached at JoanSharon@aol.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Obama Deception

Continental congress Live

Obama to sign treaty to give up American sovereignty


For The Record

Search Posts

Medical Martial Law

Obama Health Care Plan is a Duplicate of HItler's Health Care Plan

Obama poisoned his grandmother

Hitler's Health Plan same as Obama's

object width="480" height="295">

We The People Congress.org / blog

USA must Wake Up About Muslims

Must Listen--Here's to You Obama--We Are Not Stupid